APIs · head to head
Formance vs QuestDB

Formance
APIs
Open source double-entry ledger and payment orchestration for money-moving software
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

QuestDB
Databases
Fast open source time-series database for high throughput ingestion
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Formance formance holds no money and provides no regulatory cover, so it must be paired with a payments provider or bank, and buyers occasionally mistake a ledger for a treasury system and discover the gap late.; QuestDB open-source edition lacks high-availability, distributed architecture, and enterprise security features
- They diverge on capability: Formance covers Double-entry ledger, QuestDB covers High Throughput Ingestion.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Formance and QuestDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Formance
- Double-entry ledger
- Numscript transaction DSL
- Multi-currency
- Payments connectivity
- Reconciliation
- Self-hosted deployment
- Cloud offering
- API and SDKs
Only in QuestDB
- High Throughput Ingestion
- SQL Support
- Time-series Optimization
- SIMD Vectorization
- Column-oriented Storage
- Built-in Web Console
- InfluxDB Line Protocol
- PostgreSQL
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Formance
- A marketplace splitting a single customer payment between seller, platform fee and tax that needs the split to be atomic and auditablenot QuestDB
- A fintech whose homegrown balances table produced numbers finance could not reconcile and now needs proper double-entry before an auditnot QuestDB
- A payments team that wants one normalised model across several PSPs so reconciliation is not written separately for eachnot QuestDB
- A company that wants its ledger under a licence it can keep running even if the vendor disappearsnot QuestDB
QuestDB
- Time-series analytics ingesting up to 20M rows/second from IoT sensors or financial data feedsnot Formance
- Real-time dashboarding with 32ms time-to-first-row latency for minute-level analyticsnot Formance
- Applications requiring multi-tier storage (hot ingest, real-time SQL, cold Parquet archive)not Formance
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Formance
- Formance holds no money and provides no regulatory cover, so it must be paired with a payments provider or bank, and buyers occasionally mistake a ledger for a treasury system and discover the gap late.
- Numscript is a domain-specific language your team must learn, and while it makes complex splits expressible it also means transaction logic sits outside the languages your engineers already debug well.
- Self-hosting a ledger that must never lose or duplicate a transaction is a serious operational commitment covering backups, upgrades and Postgres tuning, which is real cost the zero licence fee hides.
- Enterprise pricing is not published, so the difference between the free path and the supported path cannot be evaluated without a sales conversation.
- The company is much smaller than the incumbent alternatives, and while the MIT licence protects the code it does not protect the roadmap, so features on the hosted side may arrive slowly or change direction.
QuestDB
- Open-source edition lacks high-availability, distributed architecture, and enterprise security features
- Enterprise edition pricing not published; requires contacting sales for custom quote
- Ingestion limit of 20M rows/sec platform-dependent; may not scale to extreme throughput requirements
Pricing, plan by plan
Formance
Free- Open SourceFree
- MIT licensed core ledger
- Numscript transaction DSL
- Multi-currency tracking
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Managed or private deployment
- Payments connectivity and reconciliation
- Support with response commitments
QuestDB
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the QuestDB review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Formance if
- You need double-entry ledger.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web, API.
- You also want numscript transaction dsl.
Choose QuestDB if
- You need high throughput ingestion.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP).
- You also want sql support.
Questions people ask
- Is Formance or QuestDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Formance starts at Free and QuestDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Formance or QuestDB?
- Formance starts at Free and QuestDB at Free.
- Does Formance or QuestDB run on more platforms?
- Formance runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web, API. QuestDB runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP).
- Can I use Formance for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Formance best used for?
- Formance is most often used for a marketplace splitting a single customer payment between seller, platform fee and tax that needs the split to be atomic and auditable, a fintech whose homegrown balances table produced numbers finance could not reconcile and now needs proper double-entry before an audit, a payments team that wants one normalised model across several psps so reconciliation is not written separately for each, a company that wants its ledger under a licence it can keep running even if the vendor disappears. Of those, a marketplace splitting a single customer payment between seller, platform fee and tax that needs the split to be atomic and auditable and a fintech whose homegrown balances table produced numbers finance could not reconcile and now needs proper double-entry before an audit are not what QuestDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Formance do that QuestDB cannot?
- Formance covers Double-entry ledger, Numscript transaction DSL, Multi-currency, Payments connectivity. QuestDB covers High Throughput Ingestion, SQL Support, Time-series Optimization, SIMD Vectorization.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Formance: Is Formance really open source?
Yes. The core ledger is MIT licensed with full source access and no deployment restrictions.
QuestDB: How much does QuestDB Enterprise cost?
QuestDB does not publish specific pricing for the Enterprise tier. Customers must contact QuestDB via their enterprise contact form to receive a custom quote.
SourceFormance: Does Formance move money?
No. It records and orchestrates movements; the actual payments happen at a PSP or bank you connect.
QuestDB: Does QuestDB offer a free version?
Yes, QuestDB Open Source is completely free and recommended for evaluation, prototyping, and pilot projects. Enterprise features, high availability, security, and dedicated support require the paid Enterprise tier.
SourceFormance: What does the enterprise version cost?
Not published. It is an annual subscription quoted per customer.
QuestDB: What deployment options does QuestDB offer?
QuestDB offers open source deployment, Enterprise deployment, and Bring Your Own Cloud (BYOC) deployment. Pricing details for BYOC and Enterprise tiers are not published and require direct contact with sales.
SourceFormance: Do I have to use Numscript?
Yes for anything beyond the simplest transfers. It is how multi-party transactions are expressed atomically.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Formance vs Moov
- Formance vs Column
- Formance vs Convoy
- Formance vs Sila
- Formance vs Increase
- Formance vs Yapily
- Formance vs 10x Banking
- Formance vs Tribe Payments
- Formance vs Dwolla
- Formance vs Kong
- Formance vs Tyk
- Formance vs Volt
- Formance vs Enable Banking
- Formance vs Flybits
- Formance vs i2c
- Formance vs KeystoneJS
- Formance vs Liveblocks
- Formance vs TimescaleDB
- Formance vs PostgreSQL
- Formance vs Cockroach Labs
- Formance vs Amazon Aurora
- Formance vs Airtable
- Formance vs Firebolt
- Formance vs Apache Flink
- Formance vs DuckDB
- Formance vs OpenSearch
- Formance vs ClickHouse
- Formance vs NATS
- Formance vs Canary Labs
- Formance vs Chroma
- Formance vs Cloudinary
- Formance vs Convex
- Formance vs Dgraph
- Formance vs Dragonfly
- Formance vs Apache Druid
- QuestDB vs Moov
- QuestDB vs Column
- QuestDB vs Convoy
- QuestDB vs Sila
- QuestDB vs Increase
- QuestDB vs Yapily
- QuestDB vs 10x Banking
- QuestDB vs Tribe Payments
- QuestDB vs Dwolla
- QuestDB vs Kong
- QuestDB vs Tyk
- QuestDB vs Volt
- QuestDB vs Enable Banking
- QuestDB vs Flybits
- QuestDB vs i2c
- QuestDB vs KeystoneJS
- QuestDB vs Liveblocks
- QuestDB vs TimescaleDB
- QuestDB vs PostgreSQL
- QuestDB vs Cockroach Labs
- QuestDB vs Amazon Aurora
- QuestDB vs Airtable
- QuestDB vs Firebolt
- QuestDB vs Apache Flink
- QuestDB vs DuckDB
- QuestDB vs OpenSearch
- QuestDB vs ClickHouse
- QuestDB vs NATS
- QuestDB vs Canary Labs
- QuestDB vs Chroma
- QuestDB vs Cloudinary
- QuestDB vs Convex
- QuestDB vs Dgraph
- QuestDB vs Dragonfly
- QuestDB vs Apache Druid
