No-Code · head to head
FlutterFlow vs NocoDB

FlutterFlow
No-Code
Visual builder that outputs real Flutter code for iOS, Android and web
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

NocoDB
Spreadsheets
Open-source no-code database platform with REST and GraphQL APIs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: FlutterFlow downloading your own generated code requires the Pro tier, so on cheaper plans you can build the application but cannot take it with you, which is precisely the reason most buyers chose the product.; NocoDB the free cloud tier is capped at 3 editor seats, 1,000 records and 1 GB of storage
- They diverge on capability: FlutterFlow covers Flutter code generation, NocoDB covers REST API.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which FlutterFlow and NocoDB actually diverge.
| Attribute | FlutterFlow | NocoDB |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per user per month | freemium |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker |
| Category | No-Code | Spreadsheets |
| Founded | Unknown | 2020 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in FlutterFlow
- Flutter code generation
- Firebase and Supabase integration
- API and GraphQL calls
- Custom code
- Store deployment
- Team collaboration
Only in NocoDB
- REST API
- GraphQL API
- No-code database
- Multiple SQL databases
- Webhooks
- Automation
- Cloud support
- Self-hosted support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
FlutterFlow
- A founder building a genuine cross-platform mobile app rather than a web formnot NocoDB
- Prototyping an application that an in-house Flutter team will later take over as codenot NocoDB
- Agencies delivering client mobile apps on a fixed budget where handing over source is contractualnot NocoDB
- Internal apps that must be installed from the app stores rather than opened in a browsernot NocoDB
NocoDB
- Self-hosting an open source alternative to a spreadsheet databasenot FlutterFlow
- Putting a spreadsheet interface over an existing Postgres or MySQL databasenot FlutterFlow
- Building internal tools on structured data with an APInot FlutterFlow
- Team bases with per-field and per-table permissions on the paid tiersnot FlutterFlow
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
FlutterFlow
- Downloading your own generated code requires the Pro tier, so on cheaper plans you can build the application but cannot take it with you, which is precisely the reason most buyers chose the product.
- The output is Dart and Flutter, so the escape hatch only helps an organisation that already has or is willing to hire Flutter developers; for a non-technical buyer the exported code is unusable.
- Once logic moves into custom functions and custom widgets, the visual editor becomes slower than writing the same code by hand, so the tool works against you at exactly the point the project gets serious.
- The browser editor gets sluggish on large projects, with preview and build times that lengthen as page and component counts grow, which is felt daily by teams past the prototype stage.
- There is no backend; Firebase or Supabase modelling, security rules, indexes and their bills are entirely your responsibility, so a FlutterFlow application is always at least two subscriptions and two skill sets.
NocoDB
- The free cloud tier is capped at 3 editor seats, 1,000 records and 1 GB of storage
- Records are the metering unit on cloud, so Plus covers 50K and Business 300K rather than scaling by seat alone
- Row-level security, audit log retention and team hierarchy require the Scale tier
- SCIM provisioning and air-gapped deployment are Enterprise only
- The self-hosted Community edition is unlimited on records and seats but does without workflows, scripts and dashboards, which start at the paid self-hosted tiers
Pricing, plan by plan
FlutterFlow
Free- FreeFree
- Build and preview applications
- FlutterFlow branding
- No code download
- Standard$30/month
- Removes branding
- Custom domain for web deployment
- Local run and testing
- Pro$70/month
- Download the generated Flutter source
- GitHub integration
- Custom code and custom widgets without restriction
- Teams$70/month
- Everything in Pro, billed per user
- Shared project libraries and roles
- Branching and collaborative editing
NocoDB
Free- Free (Cloud)Free
- 3 editor seats
- 10 commenter seats
- 1 GB storage
- Plus$12/month
- Unlimited seats
- 50,000 records
- 20 GB storage
- Business$24/month
- Unlimited seats
- 300,000 records
- 100 GB storage
- Scale$45/month
- Minimum 3 seats required
- 1,000,000 records
- 150 GB storage
Which should you pick?
Choose FlutterFlow if
- You need flutter code generation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want firebase and supabase integration.
Choose NocoDB if
- You need rest api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker.
- You also want graphql api.
Questions people ask
- Is FlutterFlow or NocoDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. FlutterFlow starts at Free and NocoDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, FlutterFlow or NocoDB?
- FlutterFlow starts at Free and NocoDB at Free.
- Does FlutterFlow or NocoDB run on more platforms?
- FlutterFlow runs on Web, iOS, Android. NocoDB runs on Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker.
- Can I use FlutterFlow for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is FlutterFlow best used for?
- FlutterFlow is most often used for a founder building a genuine cross-platform mobile app rather than a web form, prototyping an application that an in-house flutter team will later take over as code, agencies delivering client mobile apps on a fixed budget where handing over source is contractual, internal apps that must be installed from the app stores rather than opened in a browser. Of those, a founder building a genuine cross-platform mobile app rather than a web form and prototyping an application that an in-house flutter team will later take over as code are not what NocoDB is typically brought in for.
- What can FlutterFlow do that NocoDB cannot?
- FlutterFlow covers Flutter code generation, Firebase and Supabase integration, API and GraphQL calls, Custom code. NocoDB covers REST API, GraphQL API, No-code database, Multiple SQL databases.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
FlutterFlow: Can I export the code?
Yes, on the Pro tier and above. Lower tiers can build and preview but not download the Flutter project.
NocoDB: Is NocoDB free?
Yes, NocoDB offers a free cloud plan with 3 editor seats, 1,000 records, 1 GB storage, and 1,000 API calls per month. A free self-hosted Community edition with unlimited records and seats is also available.
SourceFlutterFlow: Do I need to know how to code?
Not to build a straightforward application. You will need Dart for custom functions, for anything unusual, and for maintaining the exported project afterwards.
NocoDB: How much does NocoDB Plus cost?
NocoDB Plus costs $12 per seat per month (billed annually) or $15 per seat per month (monthly). For unlimited seats, it costs $108/month annually or $180/month monthly. Plus includes 50,000 records, 20 GB storage, and 100,000 API calls per month.
SourceFlutterFlow: Does it include a database?
No. FlutterFlow builds the client. Data lives in Firebase, Supabase or your own API, and those costs and design decisions are separate.
NocoDB: What is the difference between NocoDB Plus and Business plans?
Plus ($12/seat annual) includes 50,000 records and 100,000 API calls per month. Business ($24/seat annual) includes 300,000 records, 1,000,000 API calls per month, external database connections, SAML SSO, and table/field permissions.
SourceNocoDB: Can I self-host NocoDB for free?
Yes, NocoDB's Community edition is free for self-hosting. It includes unlimited records, storage, and seats, with all core features including webhooks and 6 view types.
SourceRelated pages
More on FlutterFlow
Other head to heads
- FlutterFlow vs Draftbit
- FlutterFlow vs Bubble
- FlutterFlow vs Thunkable
- FlutterFlow vs Adalo
- FlutterFlow vs OutSystems
- FlutterFlow vs Glide
- FlutterFlow vs Momen
- FlutterFlow vs ToolJet
- FlutterFlow vs Softr
- FlutterFlow vs Directual
- FlutterFlow vs Quickbase
- FlutterFlow vs Kintone
- FlutterFlow vs WeWeb
- FlutterFlow vs Whalesync
- FlutterFlow vs Corteza
- FlutterFlow vs APITable
- FlutterFlow vs Teable
- FlutterFlow vs Looker
- FlutterFlow vs SeaTable
- FlutterFlow vs Tableau
- FlutterFlow vs Metabase
- FlutterFlow vs Redash
- FlutterFlow vs Mathesar
- FlutterFlow vs Baserow
- FlutterFlow vs Budibase
- FlutterFlow vs Fibery
- FlutterFlow vs Apache Superset
- FlutterFlow vs Coefficient
- FlutterFlow vs Cube Software
- FlutterFlow vs Quadratic
- FlutterFlow vs Rowy
- NocoDB vs Draftbit
- NocoDB vs Bubble
- NocoDB vs Thunkable
- NocoDB vs Adalo
- NocoDB vs OutSystems
- NocoDB vs Glide
- NocoDB vs Momen
- NocoDB vs ToolJet
- NocoDB vs Softr
- NocoDB vs Directual
- NocoDB vs Quickbase
- NocoDB vs Kintone
- NocoDB vs WeWeb
- NocoDB vs Whalesync
- NocoDB vs Corteza
- NocoDB vs APITable
- NocoDB vs Teable
- NocoDB vs Looker
- NocoDB vs SeaTable
- NocoDB vs Tableau
- NocoDB vs Metabase
- NocoDB vs Redash
- NocoDB vs Mathesar
- NocoDB vs Baserow
- NocoDB vs Budibase
- NocoDB vs Fibery
- NocoDB vs Apache Superset
- NocoDB vs Coefficient
- NocoDB vs Cube Software
- NocoDB vs Quadratic
- NocoDB vs Rowy
