Automation Integration · head to head
Flowable vs ToolJet

Flowable
Automation Integration
Apache 2.0 BPMN, CMMN and DMN engine from the team that originally built Activiti
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

ToolJet
No-Code
Open-source low-code platform for building internal tools and business apps
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Flowable the open source engine is genuinely usable but ships without the modelling studio, work application and admin console, so an open source deployment means building your own user interfaces before anyone can use it.; ToolJet free and Pro tiers cap end users at 50, which may be too low for apps needing broad internal distribution.
- They diverge on capability: Flowable covers BPMN 2.0 engine, ToolJet covers Drag-and-drop app builder.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Flowable and ToolJet actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Flowable
- BPMN 2.0 engine
- CMMN case management
- DMN decision tables
- Spring Boot integration
- Modelling studio
- Task and case application
- REST APIs
- History and audit
Only in ToolJet
- Drag-and-drop app builder
- AI-assisted generation
- Database and API connectors
- Self-hosted and air-gapped deployment
- Multi-instance deployments
- Dedicated support manager
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Flowable
- An insurer automating claims handling where each case follows a different path and BPMN alone cannot express itnot ToolJet
- A bank embedding process orchestration inside an existing Spring Boot estate rather than buying a separate platformnot ToolJet
- A team leaving Activiti or jBPM that wants the same API family with active commercial maintenancenot ToolJet
- A regulated organisation needing complete process history and decision table audit trails for supervisorsnot ToolJet
ToolJet
- Building internal admin dashboards and appsnot Flowable
- Self-hosted or air-gapped internal tool deploymentnot Flowable
- AI-assisted rapid app prototypingnot Flowable
- Connecting multiple data sources into one appnot Flowable
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Flowable
- The open source engine is genuinely usable but ships without the modelling studio, work application and admin console, so an open source deployment means building your own user interfaces before anyone can use it.
- It expects Java engineering capacity; teams looking for a business-user low-code automation tool will find the modelling and deployment cycle far too technical.
- Enterprise pricing is not published and is quoted per deployment, leaving buyers without a benchmark against Camunda or IBM alternatives.
- The Activiti fork left three engines with related APIs and overlapping documentation in circulation, and search results routinely return advice for the wrong one.
- Flowable AG is a small Swiss company relative to its competitors, so the partner network, training market and pool of engineers with production experience are all limited outside Europe.
ToolJet
- Free and Pro tiers cap end users at 50, which may be too low for apps needing broad internal distribution.
- Enterprise pricing starts at a steep $3,000/month, a large jump from the $199/month Team plan.
- AI credits reset monthly and do not roll over, penalizing uneven month-to-month usage.
- Smaller integration and community ecosystem than more established players like Retool.
Pricing, plan by plan
Flowable
Free- Flowable Open SourceFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed BPMN, CMMN and DMN engines
- Embeddable Java library or standalone apps
- No modelling studio or enterprise applications
- Flowable Enterprise$undefined/year
- Modelling studio, work application and admin console
- Connectors, forms and advanced identity management
- Support with SLA and version maintenance
ToolJet
Free- FreeFree
- 2 builders
- 50 end users
- 2 apps
- Pro$79/month
- Unlimited builders (per-builder pricing)
- 50 end users
- 5 apps
- Team$199/month
- Unlimited builders (per-builder pricing)
- 100 end users
- Unlimited apps
- Enterprise$3000/month
- Unlimited end users
- Custom AI credits
- Dedicated support manager
Which should you pick?
Choose Flowable if
- You need bpmn 2.0 engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want cmmn case management.
Choose ToolJet if
- You need drag-and-drop app builder.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api, linux, windows, mac.
- You also want ai-assisted generation.
Questions people ask
- Is Flowable or ToolJet better?
- Neither clearly leads. Flowable starts at Free and ToolJet at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Flowable or ToolJet?
- Flowable starts at Free and ToolJet at Free.
- Does Flowable or ToolJet run on more platforms?
- Flowable runs on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud. ToolJet runs on web, api, linux, windows, mac.
- Can I use Flowable for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Flowable best used for?
- Flowable is most often used for an insurer automating claims handling where each case follows a different path and bpmn alone cannot express it, a bank embedding process orchestration inside an existing spring boot estate rather than buying a separate platform, a team leaving activiti or jbpm that wants the same api family with active commercial maintenance, a regulated organisation needing complete process history and decision table audit trails for supervisors. Of those, an insurer automating claims handling where each case follows a different path and bpmn alone cannot express it and a bank embedding process orchestration inside an existing spring boot estate rather than buying a separate platform are not what ToolJet is typically brought in for.
- What can Flowable do that ToolJet cannot?
- Flowable covers BPMN 2.0 engine, CMMN case management, DMN decision tables, Spring Boot integration. ToolJet covers Drag-and-drop app builder, AI-assisted generation, Database and API connectors, Self-hosted and air-gapped deployment.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Flowable: Is Flowable open source?
Yes, the BPMN, CMMN and DMN engines are Apache 2.0. The modelling studio and enterprise applications are commercial.
ToolJet: What happens if I run out of AI credits?
Users can continue using all other ToolJet features as normal and can contact support to purchase additional AI credits when the monthly allotment runs out.
SourceFlowable: How does it relate to Activiti and jBPM?
The same core developers built jBPM, then Activiti, then forked Activiti in 2016 to create Flowable.
ToolJet: Do unused AI credits roll over?
No, AI credits reset every month and unused credits do not carry over, which ToolJet says helps maintain consistent service quality.
SourceFlowable: What does Flowable Enterprise cost?
Nothing is published. It is quoted per deployment by the vendor.
ToolJet: Can ToolJet be deployed on-premise?
Yes, both the community and enterprise editions support on-premise and air-gapped deployments, typically completed in under 30 minutes.
SourceFlowable: Why choose it over Camunda?
CMMN case management is a first-class engine, which matters when work is exception-driven rather than a fixed sequence.
ToolJet: Is there a free trial for paid plans?
ToolJet offers a 14-day free trial for both its business and enterprise editions.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Flowable vs Temporal
- Flowable vs Nintex
- Flowable vs jBPM
- Flowable vs Activiti
- Flowable vs Camunda
- Flowable vs Kogito
- Flowable vs Airbyte
- Flowable vs Nango
- Flowable vs Windmill
- Flowable vs Hatchet
- Flowable vs Meltano
- Flowable vs RudderStack
- Flowable vs HighLevel
- Flowable vs Grouparoo
- Flowable vs Hevo Data
- Flowable vs HighByte Intelligence Hub
- Flowable vs IBM MQ
- Flowable vs Superblocks
- Flowable vs Appsmith
- Flowable vs Softr
- Flowable vs Corteza
- Flowable vs Draftbit
- Flowable vs FlutterFlow
- Flowable vs Bubble
- Flowable vs Noloco
- Flowable vs Stacker
- Flowable vs Adalo
- Flowable vs Thunkable
- Flowable vs AppSheet
- Flowable vs Whalesync
- Flowable vs Directual
- Flowable vs Momen
- Flowable vs Pabbly Connect
- ToolJet vs Temporal
- ToolJet vs Nintex
- ToolJet vs jBPM
- ToolJet vs Activiti
- ToolJet vs Camunda
- ToolJet vs Kogito
- ToolJet vs Airbyte
- ToolJet vs Nango
- ToolJet vs Windmill
- ToolJet vs Hatchet
- ToolJet vs Meltano
- ToolJet vs RudderStack
- ToolJet vs HighLevel
- ToolJet vs Grouparoo
- ToolJet vs Hevo Data
- ToolJet vs HighByte Intelligence Hub
- ToolJet vs IBM MQ
- ToolJet vs Superblocks
- ToolJet vs Appsmith
- ToolJet vs Softr
- ToolJet vs Corteza
- ToolJet vs Draftbit
- ToolJet vs FlutterFlow
- ToolJet vs Bubble
- ToolJet vs Noloco
- ToolJet vs Stacker
- ToolJet vs Adalo
- ToolJet vs Thunkable
- ToolJet vs AppSheet
- ToolJet vs Whalesync
- ToolJet vs Directual
- ToolJet vs Momen
- ToolJet vs Pabbly Connect
