Automation Integration · head to head
Flowable vs Pipedream

Flowable
Automation Integration
Apache 2.0 BPMN, CMMN and DMN engine from the team that originally built Activiti
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Pipedream
Automation Integration
Build reliable workflows in minutes, not months
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Flowable the open source engine is genuinely usable but ships without the modelling studio, work application and admin console, so an open source deployment means building your own user interfaces before anyone can use it.; Pipedream the Internet Archive's capture of Pipedream's pricing page on 26 December 2023 listed Free at $0/month (750 credits/mo, 3 active workflows, 3 connected accounts), Basic at $19/month billed annually (2,000 credits, 20 workflows), Advanced at $49/month billed annually (5,000 credits, unlimited workflows), and Business at $99/month billed annually (dedicated VPC, SSO); Enterprise is by contact only.
- They diverge on capability: Flowable covers BPMN 2.0 engine, Pipedream covers Workflow builder.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Flowable and Pipedream actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Flowable
- BPMN 2.0 engine
- CMMN case management
- DMN decision tables
- Spring Boot integration
- Modelling studio
- Task and case application
- REST APIs
- History and audit
Only in Pipedream
- Workflow builder
- Node.js scripting
- Webhooks
- Schedulers
- Data transformation
- Error handling
- Analytics
- Git integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Flowable
- An insurer automating claims handling where each case follows a different path and BPMN alone cannot express itnot Pipedream
- A bank embedding process orchestration inside an existing Spring Boot estate rather than buying a separate platformnot Pipedream
- A team leaving Activiti or jBPM that wants the same API family with active commercial maintenancenot Pipedream
- A regulated organisation needing complete process history and decision table audit trails for supervisorsnot Pipedream
Pipedream
- Workflow Automationnot Flowable
- Data Integrationnot Flowable
- Process Automationnot Flowable
- App Integrationnot Flowable
- API Connectivitynot Flowable
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Flowable
- The open source engine is genuinely usable but ships without the modelling studio, work application and admin console, so an open source deployment means building your own user interfaces before anyone can use it.
- It expects Java engineering capacity; teams looking for a business-user low-code automation tool will find the modelling and deployment cycle far too technical.
- Enterprise pricing is not published and is quoted per deployment, leaving buyers without a benchmark against Camunda or IBM alternatives.
- The Activiti fork left three engines with related APIs and overlapping documentation in circulation, and search results routinely return advice for the wrong one.
- Flowable AG is a small Swiss company relative to its competitors, so the partner network, training market and pool of engineers with production experience are all limited outside Europe.
Pipedream
- The Internet Archive's capture of Pipedream's pricing page on 26 December 2023 listed Free at $0/month (750 credits/mo, 3 active workflows, 3 connected accounts), Basic at $19/month billed annually (2,000 credits, 20 workflows), Advanced at $49/month billed annually (5,000 credits, unlimited workflows), and Business at $99/month billed annually (dedicated VPC, SSO); Enterprise is by contact only.
Pricing, plan by plan
Flowable
Free- Flowable Open SourceFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed BPMN, CMMN and DMN engines
- Embeddable Java library or standalone apps
- No modelling studio or enterprise applications
- Flowable Enterprise$undefined/year
- Modelling studio, work application and admin console
- Connectors, forms and advanced identity management
- Support with SLA and version maintenance
Pipedream
Free- FreeFree
- 100000 executions/month
- 1000 sources
- Community support
- Pro$50/month
- 500000 executions/month
- Unlimited sources
- Email support
- Business$250/month
- Unlimited executions
- Priority support
- Advanced features
Which should you pick?
Choose Flowable if
- You need bpmn 2.0 engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want cmmn case management.
Choose Pipedream if
- You need workflow builder.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want node.js scripting.
Questions people ask
- Is Flowable or Pipedream better?
- Neither clearly leads. Flowable starts at Free and Pipedream at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Flowable or Pipedream?
- Flowable starts at Free and Pipedream at Free.
- Does Flowable or Pipedream run on more platforms?
- Flowable runs on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud. Pipedream runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use Flowable for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Flowable best used for?
- Flowable is most often used for an insurer automating claims handling where each case follows a different path and bpmn alone cannot express it, a bank embedding process orchestration inside an existing spring boot estate rather than buying a separate platform, a team leaving activiti or jbpm that wants the same api family with active commercial maintenance, a regulated organisation needing complete process history and decision table audit trails for supervisors. Of those, an insurer automating claims handling where each case follows a different path and bpmn alone cannot express it and a bank embedding process orchestration inside an existing spring boot estate rather than buying a separate platform are not what Pipedream is typically brought in for.
- What can Flowable do that Pipedream cannot?
- Flowable covers BPMN 2.0 engine, CMMN case management, DMN decision tables, Spring Boot integration. Pipedream covers Workflow builder, Node.js scripting, Webhooks, Schedulers.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Flowable: Is Flowable open source?
Yes, the BPMN, CMMN and DMN engines are Apache 2.0. The modelling studio and enterprise applications are commercial.
Pipedream: What does Pipedream's free plan include?
The free plan provides access to Workflows and Connect for development purposes with limited active workflows and connected accounts. Development and testing workflows consume no credits.
SourceFlowable: How does it relate to Activiti and jBPM?
The same core developers built jBPM, then Activiti, then forked Activiti in 2016 to create Flowable.
Pipedream: How does Pipedream's credit-based billing work?
Pipedream charges one credit per 30 seconds of compute time at the default 256MB memory level. Increasing memory to 512MB doubles the credit cost. Paid plans include a base monthly credit allotment plus a platform fee.
SourceFlowable: What does Flowable Enterprise cost?
Nothing is published. It is quoted per deployment by the vendor.
Pipedream: What actions and operations consume credits?
Action executions, tool calls via MCP, deployed trigger emissions, and Connect proxy requests consume credits. Free operations include listing apps, account management, and the first 30 seconds of public registry source executions.
SourceFlowable: Why choose it over Camunda?
CMMN case management is a first-class engine, which matters when work is exception-driven rather than a fixed sequence.
Pipedream: How is Pipedream's Connect feature billed?
Connect billing includes API usage charges for operations and compute, plus per-end-user charges based on unique external users connecting accounts, not the number of accounts.
SourcePipedream: What happens if I downgrade my plan?
Plan downgrades take effect at the end of the current billing cycle, and the new plan's limits are enforced at that time. Cancellation also takes effect at the end of the current period.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Flowable vs Temporal
- Flowable vs Nintex
- Flowable vs jBPM
- Flowable vs Activiti
- Flowable vs Camunda
- Flowable vs Kogito
- Flowable vs Airbyte
- Flowable vs Nango
- Flowable vs Windmill
- Flowable vs Hatchet
- Flowable vs Meltano
- Flowable vs RudderStack
- Flowable vs HighLevel
- Flowable vs Grouparoo
- Flowable vs Hevo Data
- Flowable vs HighByte Intelligence Hub
- Flowable vs IBM MQ
- Flowable vs n8n
- Flowable vs Zapier
- Flowable vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Flowable vs MuleSoft
- Flowable vs Integromat
- Flowable vs Parabola
- Flowable vs Blue Prism
- Flowable vs Tray.io
- Flowable vs Automate.io
- Flowable vs Autonoly
- Flowable vs Xano
- Flowable vs Mage AI
- Flowable vs mParticle
- Flowable vs UiPath
- Flowable vs Alloy Automation
- Flowable vs Celigo
- Pipedream vs Temporal
- Pipedream vs Nintex
- Pipedream vs jBPM
- Pipedream vs Activiti
- Pipedream vs Camunda
- Pipedream vs Kogito
- Pipedream vs Airbyte
- Pipedream vs Nango
- Pipedream vs Windmill
- Pipedream vs Hatchet
- Pipedream vs Meltano
- Pipedream vs RudderStack
- Pipedream vs HighLevel
- Pipedream vs Grouparoo
- Pipedream vs Hevo Data
- Pipedream vs HighByte Intelligence Hub
- Pipedream vs IBM MQ
- Pipedream vs n8n
- Pipedream vs Zapier
- Pipedream vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Pipedream vs MuleSoft
- Pipedream vs Integromat
- Pipedream vs Parabola
- Pipedream vs Blue Prism
- Pipedream vs Tray.io
- Pipedream vs Automate.io
- Pipedream vs Autonoly
- Pipedream vs Xano
- Pipedream vs Mage AI
- Pipedream vs mParticle
- Pipedream vs UiPath
- Pipedream vs Alloy Automation
- Pipedream vs Celigo
