Software Development · head to head
Flagsmith vs Kameleoon

Flagsmith
Software Development
Open-source feature flag and remote config platform
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Kameleoon
Testing
A/B testing and feature experimentation with a hybrid client and server-side engine
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Flagsmith has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Flagsmith the Free plan supports only a single team member, limiting collaboration for small teams.; Kameleoon no rate card is published. Reported entry pricing around several hundred euros a month for the limited prompt-based tier comes from third parties rather than Kameleoon, so any budget you build before contacting sales is a guess.
- They diverge on capability: Flagsmith covers Segments, Kameleoon covers Visual A/B test editor.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Flagsmith and Kameleoon actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Flagsmith
- Segments
- A/B testing
- Scheduled flags
- SDKs
- SAML/SSO
Only in Kameleoon
- Visual A/B test editor
- Server-side experimentation
- Anti-flicker engine
- AI personalisation
- EU data hosting
- Shared audiences
- Statistics options
Both cover
- Feature flags
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Flagsmith
- Gradual feature rollouts across environmentsnot Kameleoon
- Remote configuration without redeploying codenot Kameleoon
- Running A/B tests tied to feature flagsnot Kameleoon
- Self-hosting feature flags for data residency requirementsnot Kameleoon
Kameleoon
- A European retailer whose legal team requires EU-hosted experimentation data and has ruled out US-only vendorsnot Flagsmith
- A team running both marketing page tests and product feature rollouts that wants one results engine rather than two disagreeing onesnot Flagsmith
- A media site where client-side flicker on a test variant is visibly damaging the reading experiencenot Flagsmith
- An organisation re-tendering experimentation after Optimizely or VWO pricing changes and wanting an independent European vendornot Flagsmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Flagsmith
- The Free plan supports only a single team member, limiting collaboration for small teams.
- Exceeding request limits triggers overage charges after a one-time 30-day grace period.
- Enterprise-grade SSO and governance are locked behind the Scale-Up and Enterprise tiers.
- Self-hosting requires operating and updating the platform yourself, unlike a fully managed SaaS competitor.
Kameleoon
- No rate card is published. Reported entry pricing around several hundred euros a month for the limited prompt-based tier comes from third parties rather than Kameleoon, so any budget you build before contacting sales is a guess.
- Web experimentation, feature experimentation and personalisation are licensed as separate capabilities, so the unified platform story costs materially more than the entry configuration most buyers are first quoted.
- The partner and agency ecosystem is concentrated in France and continental Europe; a buyer in North America or Asia will find fewer implementation specialists and less community knowledge than for Optimizely or VWO.
- The integration catalogue is smaller than the market leaders, so a stack built on less common analytics or CDP tooling may need custom work that a larger vendor would cover natively.
- Client-side visual testing still carries the structural problems of the approach, including performance cost and single-page-application fragility; the anti-flicker engine reduces the symptom but does not remove the dependency on the DOM staying stable.
Pricing, plan by plan
Flagsmith
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 50,000 requests/month
- 1 team member
- Unlimited feature flags, environments, identities and segments
- Start-Up$45/month
- Up to 1,000,000 requests/month
- 3 team members
- Scheduled flags, 2FA, A/B testing, integrations, email support
- Scale-Up$300/month
- 5,000,000+ requests/month
- 5-20 team members
- SAML/SSO, governance features, priority support
Kameleoon
On request- Kameleoon$undefined/year
- Priced on monthly tested users and features licensed
- Web experimentation, feature experimentation and personalisation licensed separately
- Free trial of the prompt-based experimentation feature, with data not retained afterwards
Which should you pick?
Choose Flagsmith if
- You need segments.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want a/b testing.
Choose Kameleoon if
- You need visual a/b test editor.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want server-side experimentation.
Questions people ask
- Is Flagsmith or Kameleoon better?
- Neither clearly leads. Flagsmith starts at Free and Kameleoon at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Flagsmith or Kameleoon?
- Flagsmith has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Flagsmith and On request for Kameleoon.
- Does Flagsmith or Kameleoon run on more platforms?
- Flagsmith runs on web, api. Kameleoon runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Flagsmith for free?
- Yes. Flagsmith has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Kameleoon starts at On request.
- What is Flagsmith best used for?
- Flagsmith is most often used for gradual feature rollouts across environments, remote configuration without redeploying code, running a/b tests tied to feature flags, self-hosting feature flags for data residency requirements. Of those, gradual feature rollouts across environments and remote configuration without redeploying code are not what Kameleoon is typically brought in for.
- What can Flagsmith do that Kameleoon cannot?
- Flagsmith covers Segments, A/B testing, Scheduled flags, SDKs. Kameleoon covers Visual A/B test editor, Server-side experimentation, Anti-flicker engine, AI personalisation. Both handle Feature flags.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Flagsmith: What does Flagsmith cost?
Flagsmith has a Free plan, a Start-Up plan from $40-45/month, a Scale-Up plan from $250-300/month, and custom Enterprise pricing.
SourceKameleoon: Does Kameleoon publish pricing?
No. Pricing depends on monthly tested users and which capabilities you licence, and requires a sales conversation.
Flagsmith: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
The Free plan supports up to 50,000 requests per month and 1 team member, with unlimited feature flags, environments, identities and segments.
SourceKameleoon: Can I keep data in the EU?
Yes. EU hosting and a GDPR-first consent model are among the main reasons European buyers shortlist it.
Flagsmith: How is usage metered?
Usage is metered by monthly API requests; exceeding a plan's limit triggers overage charges starting around $50 per million requests, with a 30-day grace period the first time a paid plan exceeds its limit.
SourceKameleoon: Does it do feature flags as well as A/B tests?
Yes, through server-side SDKs, sharing audiences and results with the visual testing side.
Kameleoon: How does it compare with Optimizely?
Similar capability at a smaller scale. Kameleoon's advantages are European data residency and an independent vendor; Optimizely's are ecosystem size and partner availability.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Flagsmith vs Unleash
- Flagsmith vs Drizzle ORM
- Flagsmith vs TeamCity
- Flagsmith vs Val Town
- Flagsmith vs Cursor
- Flagsmith vs Windsurf
- Flagsmith vs Zed
- Flagsmith vs Amp
- Flagsmith vs Braintrust
- Flagsmith vs Codacy
- Flagsmith vs DeepSource
- Flagsmith vs Devin
- Flagsmith vs Bun
- Flagsmith vs Cline
- Flagsmith vs Factory
- Flagsmith vs Humanloop
- Flagsmith vs Langfuse
- Flagsmith vs LangSmith
- Flagsmith vs GrowthBook
- Flagsmith vs Split
- Flagsmith vs Eppo
- Flagsmith vs Insomnia
- Flagsmith vs Appium
- Flagsmith vs TestRail
- Flagsmith vs Qase
- Flagsmith vs Applitools
- Flagsmith vs Vitest
- Flagsmith vs k6
- Flagsmith vs PractiTest
- Flagsmith vs Ranorex
- Flagsmith vs Sauce Labs
- Flagsmith vs Xray Test Management
- Flagsmith vs Zephyr Scale
- Flagsmith vs JUnit
- Flagsmith vs WebdriverIO
- Kameleoon vs Unleash
- Kameleoon vs Drizzle ORM
- Kameleoon vs TeamCity
- Kameleoon vs Val Town
- Kameleoon vs Cursor
- Kameleoon vs Windsurf
- Kameleoon vs Zed
- Kameleoon vs Amp
- Kameleoon vs Braintrust
- Kameleoon vs Codacy
- Kameleoon vs DeepSource
- Kameleoon vs Devin
- Kameleoon vs Bun
- Kameleoon vs Cline
- Kameleoon vs Factory
- Kameleoon vs Humanloop
- Kameleoon vs Langfuse
- Kameleoon vs LangSmith
- Kameleoon vs GrowthBook
- Kameleoon vs Split
- Kameleoon vs Eppo
- Kameleoon vs Insomnia
- Kameleoon vs Appium
- Kameleoon vs TestRail
- Kameleoon vs Qase
- Kameleoon vs Applitools
- Kameleoon vs Vitest
- Kameleoon vs k6
- Kameleoon vs PractiTest
- Kameleoon vs Ranorex
- Kameleoon vs Sauce Labs
- Kameleoon vs Xray Test Management
- Kameleoon vs Zephyr Scale
- Kameleoon vs JUnit
- Kameleoon vs WebdriverIO
