Business Intelligence · head to head
Fabi vs Keras

Fabi
Business Intelligence
AI notebooks combining SQL, Python and no-code for small data teams
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fabi fabi is an early-stage company with a small team, so the durability risk is real and there is no obvious migration path for Smartbooks if it stops trading.; Keras limited customization compared to TensorFlow; advanced users may find constraints in complex model designs
- They diverge on capability: Fabi covers Smartbooks, Keras covers Sequential and Functional API.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fabi and Keras actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fabi
- Smartbooks
- Smart Reports
- AI analysis
- Scheduled runs
- Database connectors
- Viewer seats
Only in Keras
- Sequential and Functional API
- Pre-built neural network layers
- Model training and evaluation
- Transfer learning
- Model serialization
- TensorFlow
- JAX
- PyTorch
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fabi
- A single analyst at a startup fielding ad hoc questions faster than dashboards can be built for themnot Keras
- An operations team that needs Python for a one-off analysis but has to hand the result to non-technical colleaguesnot Keras
- Replacing a set of scheduled Jupyter notebooks that nobody outside the data team can read or rerunnot Keras
- Exploratory work against a warehouse where building a semantic model first would cost more than the answer is worthnot Keras
Keras
- Machine learningnot Fabi
- Data analysisnot Fabi
- Model trainingnot Fabi
- Predictive analyticsnot Fabi
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fabi
- Fabi is an early-stage company with a small team, so the durability risk is real and there is no obvious migration path for Smartbooks if it stops trading.
- There is no meaningful governance layer: no data catalogue, no certified metric definitions and limited lineage, so it does not scale to an organisation that needs a single agreed number.
- The free and Builder tiers cap AI requests, and the daily cap on Starter is reached quickly during genuine exploratory work.
- Connector counts are limited by tier, so the Builder plan at 39 dollars connects to exactly one data source, which is rarely enough in practice.
- It overlaps heavily with what Snowflake, Databricks and Hex now ship natively, so a company already paying for one of those is buying a fourth notebook interface.
Keras
- Limited customization compared to TensorFlow; advanced users may find constraints in complex model designs
- Error messages can be vague and unhelpful, making debugging challenging
- Smaller ecosystem and fewer pre-trained models than TensorFlow or PyTorch
Pricing, plan by plan
Fabi
Free- StarterFree
- One builder seat
- Ten dashboard viewers
- Five Smartbooks
- Builder$39/month
- Twenty-five Smart Report viewers
- Ten Smartbooks with workflows
- One data connector
- Team$199/month
- Four builder seats, extra seats at 39 USD
- Fifty viewers
- Premium connector
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Unlimited builder seats
- Full connector access
- Custom security review
Keras
Free- Open SourceFree
- High-level API
- Pre-built layers
- Model serialization
Which should you pick?
Choose Fabi if
- You need smartbooks.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want smart reports.
Choose Keras if
- You need sequential and functional api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Python, Google Colab, Jupyter.
- You also want pre-built neural network layers.
Questions people ask
- Is Fabi or Keras better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fabi starts at Free and Keras at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fabi or Keras?
- Fabi starts at Free and Keras at Free.
- Does Fabi or Keras run on more platforms?
- Fabi runs on Web. Keras runs on Python, Google Colab, Jupyter.
- Can I use Fabi for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Fabi best used for?
- Fabi is most often used for a single analyst at a startup fielding ad hoc questions faster than dashboards can be built for them, an operations team that needs python for a one-off analysis but has to hand the result to non-technical colleagues, replacing a set of scheduled jupyter notebooks that nobody outside the data team can read or rerun, exploratory work against a warehouse where building a semantic model first would cost more than the answer is worth. Of those, a single analyst at a startup fielding ad hoc questions faster than dashboards can be built for them and an operations team that needs python for a one-off analysis but has to hand the result to non-technical colleagues are not what Keras is typically brought in for.
- What can Fabi do that Keras cannot?
- Fabi covers Smartbooks, Smart Reports, AI analysis, Scheduled runs. Keras covers Sequential and Functional API, Pre-built neural network layers, Model training and evaluation, Transfer learning.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Fabi: Is there a free plan?
Yes, a Starter tier with one builder, ten viewers, five Smartbooks and ten AI requests a day.
Keras: What is Keras?
Keras is a high-level deep learning API built on top of TensorFlow that simplifies building and training neural networks. Keras 3 supports multiple backends including TensorFlow, PyTorch, and JAX, making it backend-agnostic.
SourceFabi: Do viewers cost money?
Viewers are bundled by tier rather than charged individually; builders are the priced seat.
Keras: What model architectures does Keras support?
Keras supports the Sequential model for linear stacks of layers, the Functional API for arbitrary graph architectures, and model subclassing for custom implementations. All approaches provide access to layers, optimizers, metrics, and callbacks.
SourceFabi: Can I run arbitrary Python?
Yes, Smartbooks include Python cells alongside SQL and no-code steps.
Keras: Can Keras models run on TPUs and GPUs?
Yes, Keras models can run on TPU Pods or large GPU clusters, be exported to run in browsers or on mobile devices, and be served via web APIs.
SourceFabi: How many data connectors does the entry paid plan include?
One. Additional and premium connectors come with the Team tier.
Keras: Does Keras offer pre-trained models?
Yes, Keras provides pre-trained models through KerasHub and Keras Applications for common deep learning tasks like image classification, object detection, and NLP.
SourceKeras: Who should use Keras?
Keras is ideal for beginners and rapid prototyping due to its simplicity and user-friendly interface. Advanced users and production deployments may benefit more from lower-level frameworks like TensorFlow or PyTorch for greater customization.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Fabi vs Hex
- Fabi vs Deepnote
- Fabi vs Mode
- Fabi vs Periscope Data
- Fabi vs Zenlytic
- Fabi vs Evidence
- Fabi vs Cube
- Fabi vs Reportz
- Fabi vs Anaplan
- Fabi vs Grow
- Fabi vs Luzmo
- Fabi vs Phocas
- Fabi vs DashThis
- Fabi vs Dundas BI
- Fabi vs Exa
- Fabi vs Geckoboard
- Fabi vs Glassbox
- Fabi vs Glean
- Fabi vs PyTorch
- Fabi vs scikit-learn
- Fabi vs Python
- Fabi vs Anaconda
- Fabi vs AWS SageMaker
- Fabi vs Azure Machine Learning
- Fabi vs DataRobot
- Fabi vs Jupyter
- Fabi vs H2O.ai
- Fabi vs Dataiku
- Fabi vs Pinecone
- Fabi vs Groq
- Fabi vs Weka
- Fabi vs BentoML
- Fabi vs ClearML
- Fabi vs Cohere
- Fabi vs Dask
- Fabi vs Fal AI
- Keras vs Hex
- Keras vs Deepnote
- Keras vs Mode
- Keras vs Periscope Data
- Keras vs Zenlytic
- Keras vs Evidence
- Keras vs Cube
- Keras vs Reportz
- Keras vs Anaplan
- Keras vs Grow
- Keras vs Luzmo
- Keras vs Phocas
- Keras vs DashThis
- Keras vs Dundas BI
- Keras vs Exa
- Keras vs Geckoboard
- Keras vs Glassbox
- Keras vs Glean
- Keras vs PyTorch
- Keras vs scikit-learn
- Keras vs Python
- Keras vs Anaconda
- Keras vs AWS SageMaker
- Keras vs Azure Machine Learning
- Keras vs DataRobot
- Keras vs Jupyter
- Keras vs H2O.ai
- Keras vs Dataiku
- Keras vs Pinecone
- Keras vs Groq
- Keras vs Weka
- Keras vs BentoML
- Keras vs ClearML
- Keras vs Cohere
- Keras vs Dask
- Keras vs Fal AI

