Business Intelligence · head to head
Evidence vs QuestDB

Evidence
Business Intelligence
Business intelligence as code for teams and AI agents
- From
- $2500/month
- Rated
- -

QuestDB
Databases
Fast open source time-series database for high throughput ingestion
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only QuestDB has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Evidence high starting price at $2,500/month limits small team adoption; QuestDB open-source edition lacks high-availability, distributed architecture, and enterprise security features
- They diverge on capability: Evidence covers Analytics Agent, QuestDB covers High Throughput Ingestion.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Evidence and QuestDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Evidence
- Analytics Agent
- Code-based infrastructure
- Development environment
- Visualization tools
- Embedded analytics
- Enterprise security
- Multi-channel access
Only in QuestDB
- High Throughput Ingestion
- SQL Support
- Time-series Optimization
- SIMD Vectorization
- Column-oriented Storage
- Built-in Web Console
- InfluxDB Line Protocol
- PostgreSQL
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Evidence
- Building version-controlled analytics infrastructurenot QuestDB
- Enabling AI agents to answer business questionsnot QuestDB
- Delivering analytics through multiple channels (web, Slack, ChatGPT)not QuestDB
- Embedding white-labeled analytics in productsnot QuestDB
QuestDB
- Time-series analytics ingesting up to 20M rows/second from IoT sensors or financial data feedsnot Evidence
- Real-time dashboarding with 32ms time-to-first-row latency for minute-level analyticsnot Evidence
- Applications requiring multi-tier storage (hot ingest, real-time SQL, cold Parquet archive)not Evidence
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Evidence
- High starting price at $2,500/month limits small team adoption
- No freemium option for evaluation or learning
- Code-based approach has steeper learning curve than visual tools
- AI credits limited on Team plan; additional credits cost extra
- Requires Git workflow familiarity for effective collaboration
QuestDB
- Open-source edition lacks high-availability, distributed architecture, and enterprise security features
- Enterprise edition pricing not published; requires contacting sales for custom quote
- Ingestion limit of 20M rows/sec platform-dependent; may not scale to extreme throughput requirements
Pricing, plan by plan
Evidence
$2500/month- Team$2500/month
- Unlimited users
- Monthly billing
- Analytics Agent
- Enterprise$null/custom
- All Team features
- SSO/SAML authentication
- SCIM directory sync
QuestDB
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the QuestDB review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Evidence if
- You need analytics agent.
- You work on Cloud, Embedded.
- You also want code-based infrastructure.
Choose QuestDB if
- You need high throughput ingestion.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP).
- You also want sql support.
Questions people ask
- Is Evidence or QuestDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Evidence starts at $2500/month and QuestDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Evidence or QuestDB?
- QuestDB has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $2500/month for Evidence and Free for QuestDB.
- Does Evidence or QuestDB run on more platforms?
- Evidence runs on Cloud, Embedded. QuestDB runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP).
- Can I use QuestDB for free?
- Yes. QuestDB has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Evidence starts at $2500/month.
- What is Evidence best used for?
- Evidence is most often used for building version-controlled analytics infrastructure, enabling ai agents to answer business questions, delivering analytics through multiple channels (web, slack, chatgpt), embedding white-labeled analytics in products. Of those, building version-controlled analytics infrastructure and enabling ai agents to answer business questions are not what QuestDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Evidence do that QuestDB cannot?
- Evidence covers Analytics Agent, Code-based infrastructure, Development environment, Visualization tools. QuestDB covers High Throughput Ingestion, SQL Support, Time-series Optimization, SIMD Vectorization.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Evidence: Does Evidence have per-user pricing?
No, Evidence offers one flat price for unlimited users at $2,500/month on the Team plan with a 30-day free trial.
SourceQuestDB: How much does QuestDB Enterprise cost?
QuestDB does not publish specific pricing for the Enterprise tier. Customers must contact QuestDB via their enterprise contact form to receive a custom quote.
SourceEvidence: How many AI credits come with Team plan?
Team plan includes 20,000 AI credits monthly at $0.01 per additional credit. Enterprise offers custom credit packages.
SourceQuestDB: Does QuestDB offer a free version?
Yes, QuestDB Open Source is completely free and recommended for evaluation, prototyping, and pilot projects. Enterprise features, high availability, security, and dedicated support require the paid Enterprise tier.
SourceEvidence: What is included in the Enterprise plan?
Enterprise adds SSO/SAML, SCIM directory sync, row-level access rules, embedding capabilities, and custom deployment options at custom pricing.
SourceQuestDB: What deployment options does QuestDB offer?
QuestDB offers open source deployment, Enterprise deployment, and Bring Your Own Cloud (BYOC) deployment. Pricing details for BYOC and Enterprise tiers are not published and require direct contact with sales.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Evidence vs Cube
- Evidence vs Zenlytic
- Evidence vs Hex
- Evidence vs Fabi
- Evidence vs Phocas
- Evidence vs Rill Data
- Evidence vs GoodData
- Evidence vs Grow
- Evidence vs Sisense
- Evidence vs MicroStrategy
- Evidence vs Anaplan
- Evidence vs Deepnote
- Evidence vs Chartio
- Evidence vs ChartMogul
- Evidence vs Dundas BI
- Evidence vs Exa
- Evidence vs Glassbox
- Evidence vs TimescaleDB
- Evidence vs PostgreSQL
- Evidence vs Cockroach Labs
- Evidence vs Amazon Aurora
- Evidence vs Airtable
- Evidence vs Firebolt
- Evidence vs Apache Flink
- Evidence vs DuckDB
- Evidence vs OpenSearch
- Evidence vs ClickHouse
- Evidence vs NATS
- Evidence vs Canary Labs
- Evidence vs Chroma
- Evidence vs Cloudinary
- Evidence vs Convex
- Evidence vs Dgraph
- Evidence vs Dragonfly
- Evidence vs Apache Druid
- QuestDB vs Cube
- QuestDB vs Zenlytic
- QuestDB vs Hex
- QuestDB vs Fabi
- QuestDB vs Phocas
- QuestDB vs Rill Data
- QuestDB vs GoodData
- QuestDB vs Grow
- QuestDB vs Sisense
- QuestDB vs MicroStrategy
- QuestDB vs Anaplan
- QuestDB vs Deepnote
- QuestDB vs Chartio
- QuestDB vs ChartMogul
- QuestDB vs Dundas BI
- QuestDB vs Exa
- QuestDB vs Glassbox
- QuestDB vs TimescaleDB
- QuestDB vs PostgreSQL
- QuestDB vs Cockroach Labs
- QuestDB vs Amazon Aurora
- QuestDB vs Airtable
- QuestDB vs Firebolt
- QuestDB vs Apache Flink
- QuestDB vs DuckDB
- QuestDB vs OpenSearch
- QuestDB vs ClickHouse
- QuestDB vs NATS
- QuestDB vs Canary Labs
- QuestDB vs Chroma
- QuestDB vs Cloudinary
- QuestDB vs Convex
- QuestDB vs Dgraph
- QuestDB vs Dragonfly
- QuestDB vs Apache Druid
