Softwr

Developer Tools · head to head

ESLint vs Preact

ESLint logo

ESLint

Developer Tools

Find and fix problems in JavaScript code

From
Free
Free plan
Yes
Preact logo

Preact

Web Development

3kB alternative to React with the same modern API

From
Free
Free plan
Yes

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: ESLint slow performance on large codebases compared to newer tools like Oxlint and Biome; Preact compatibility through preact/compat is good but not total, and some React libraries break in ways that are hard to diagnose
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which ESLint and Preact actually diverge.

Attributes where ESLint and Preact differ
AttributeESLintPreact
Pricing modelUnknownOpen source, no licence fee
PlatformsBrowser-based JavaScript, Node.js, Any JavaScript environmentWeb
CategoryDeveloper ToolsWeb Development
Founded2019Unknown

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in ESLint

Nothing recorded that Preact does not also cover.

Only in Preact

  • 3kB runtime
  • preact/compat
  • Same modern API
  • Fast rendering

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

ESLint

  • Statically analysing JavaScript and JSX to find problems before runtimenot Preact
  • Automatically fixing issues with syntax-aware rewritesnot Preact
  • Enforcing a consistent code style across a teamnot Preact
  • Running as a CI step to block non-conforming codenot Preact
  • Writing custom rules for project-specific conventionsnot Preact

Preact

  • Embedded widgets that load inside someone else’s page and must stay smallnot ESLint
  • Marketing and content sites where JavaScript payload affects Core Web Vitalsnot ESLint
  • Applications targeting low-bandwidth or low-powered devicesnot ESLint

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

ESLint

  • Slow performance on large codebases compared to newer tools like Oxlint and Biome
  • Complexity in configuration from scratch, particularly for TypeScript support
  • Limited built-in TypeScript support, requiring separate parsers and coordination with new TypeScript features

Preact

  • Compatibility through preact/compat is good but not total, and some React libraries break in ways that are hard to diagnose
  • Behavioural differences from React exist in edge cases, particularly around event handling
  • A much smaller community, so unusual problems have fewer existing answers than React

Pricing, plan by plan

ESLint

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the ESLint review.

Preact

Free
  • PreactFree
    • Full library
    • Commercial use permitted
    • No usage limits

Which should you pick?

Choose ESLint if

  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Browser-based JavaScript, Node.js, Any JavaScript environment.

Choose Preact if

  • You need 3kb runtime.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You also want preact/compat.

Questions people ask

Is ESLint or Preact better?
Neither clearly leads. ESLint starts at Free and Preact at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, ESLint or Preact?
ESLint starts at Free and Preact at Free.
Does ESLint or Preact run on more platforms?
ESLint runs on Browser-based JavaScript, Node.js, Any JavaScript environment. Preact runs on Web.
Can I use ESLint for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is ESLint best used for?
ESLint is most often used for statically analysing javascript and jsx to find problems before runtime, automatically fixing issues with syntax-aware rewrites, enforcing a consistent code style across a team, running as a ci step to block non-conforming code. Of those, statically analysing javascript and jsx to find problems before runtime and automatically fixing issues with syntax-aware rewrites are not what Preact is typically brought in for.
What can ESLint do that Preact cannot?
Preact covers 3kB runtime, preact/compat, Same modern API, Fast rendering.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

ESLint: Does ESLint automatically fix code issues?

Many problems ESLint finds can be automatically fixed via the --fix flag. ESLint fixes are syntax-aware so you won't experience errors introduced by traditional find-and-replace algorithms.

Source
Preact: Is Preact free?

Yes, open source under the MIT licence.

ESLint: How much does ESLint cost?

ESLint is completely free and open-source software maintained by the OpenJS Foundation. The project accepts voluntary donations from sponsors.

Source
Preact: Can I use React libraries with Preact?

Most, through the preact/compat layer. Compatibility is good but not complete, so libraries relying on React internals can break.

ESLint: Can I write custom ESLint rules?

Yes. You can develop custom rules that work alongside built-in functionality through ESLint's plugin system, allowing complete customization for your project needs.

Source
Preact: Why choose Preact over React?

Bundle size, almost always. If payload is not a binding constraint, React’s ecosystem is usually the better trade.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads