Softwr

Energy & Utilities · head to head

EnergyCAP vs AVEVA PI System

EnergyCAP logo

EnergyCAP

Energy & Utilities

Utility bill and energy management software

From
$1000/month
Rated
-
AVEVA PI System logo

AVEVA PI System

Energy & Utilities

Industrial data infrastructure for real-time insights

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: EnergyCAP priced per meter per year, so cost scales with how many utility connection points exist rather than with users or sites; AVEVA PI System pricing is not published and comes through an account representative
  • They diverge on capability: EnergyCAP covers Utility bill management, AVEVA PI System covers Real-time data collection.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which EnergyCAP and AVEVA PI System actually diverge.

Attributes where EnergyCAP and AVEVA PI System differ
AttributeEnergyCAPAVEVA PI System
Starting price$1000/monthOn request
Pricing modelsubscriptionone-time
PlatformsWeb, ApiDesktop, Web, Mobile, Api
Founded19801967

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Energy & Utilities).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in EnergyCAP

  • Utility bill management
  • Energy accounting
  • Cost allocation
  • Sustainability reporting
  • Weather normalization
  • Rate analysis
  • Budgeting
  • Benchmarking

Only in AVEVA PI System

  • Real-time data collection
  • Time-series data storage
  • Asset framework
  • Visualization
  • Analytics
  • Event management
  • Notifications
  • Data integration

Both cover

  • SOC2

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

EnergyCAP

  • Tracking utility bills and energy consumption across a property portfolionot AVEVA PI System
  • Reporting on energy spend and emissions for an organisationnot AVEVA PI System

AVEVA PI System

  • Collecting and historising real-time process data from plant equipmentnot EnergyCAP
  • Operations dashboards and alerting through PI Visionnot EnergyCAP
  • Edge data collection where connectivity is intermittentnot EnergyCAP
  • Pulling process data into Excel analysis with PI DataLinknot EnergyCAP
  • Utilities, pharma, mining and oil and gas process monitoringnot EnergyCAP

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

EnergyCAP

  • Priced per meter per year, so cost scales with how many utility connection points exist rather than with users or sites
  • No figure is published at any level, and every package is quoted by sales
  • Emissions, interval data, bill capture and bill pay are separately priced add ons rather than part of the core platform

AVEVA PI System

  • Pricing is not published and comes through an account representative
  • The vendor is moving to a subscription commercial model, so perpetual licence expectations no longer hold
  • Made up of several separately named components, including PI Server, PI Vision, Edge Data Store and the adapters and connectors needed per data source

Pricing, plan by plan

EnergyCAP

$1000/month
  • Essential$1000/month
    • Utility bill management
    • Energy tracking
    • Basic reporting
  • Professional$2500/month
    • Advanced analytics
    • Sustainability reporting
    • Budgeting tools
  • Enterprise$undefined/month
    • Unlimited users
    • Custom integrations
    • API access

AVEVA PI System

On request
  • Data Archive$undefined/license
    • Time-series data storage
    • High-speed data collection
    • Data compression
  • Operations$undefined/license
    • PI Vision dashboards
    • AF analytics
    • Event frames
  • Enterprise$undefined/license
    • PI Integrator
    • Cloud connectivity
    • Advanced analytics

Which should you pick?

Choose EnergyCAP if

  • You need utility bill management.
  • You work on Web, Api.
  • You also want energy accounting.

Choose AVEVA PI System if

  • You need real-time data collection.
  • You work on Desktop, Web, Mobile, Api.
  • You also want time-series data storage.

Questions people ask

Is EnergyCAP or AVEVA PI System better?
Neither clearly leads. EnergyCAP starts at $1000/month and AVEVA PI System at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, EnergyCAP or AVEVA PI System?
EnergyCAP starts at $1000/month and AVEVA PI System at On request.
Does EnergyCAP or AVEVA PI System run on more platforms?
EnergyCAP runs on Web, Api. AVEVA PI System runs on Desktop, Web, Mobile, Api.
What is EnergyCAP best used for?
EnergyCAP is most often used for tracking utility bills and energy consumption across a property portfolio, reporting on energy spend and emissions for an organisation. Of those, tracking utility bills and energy consumption across a property portfolio and reporting on energy spend and emissions for an organisation are not what AVEVA PI System is typically brought in for.
What can EnergyCAP do that AVEVA PI System cannot?
EnergyCAP covers Utility bill management, Energy accounting, Cost allocation, Sustainability reporting. AVEVA PI System covers Real-time data collection, Time-series data storage, Asset framework, Visualization. Both handle SOC2.

Related pages

Other head to heads