Technology · head to head
Eclipse vs Userscripts

Eclipse
Technology
The Eclipse Foundation - home to a global community
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Userscripts
Browser Extensions
Open-source userscript manager for Safari on Mac and iOS
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Eclipse high memory consumption and CPU usage, especially with multiple plugins installed; Userscripts safari cannot let extensions bypass a site's Content Security Policy, so strict sites produce "Refused to execute a script" errors that the @inject-into workaround does not always fix.
- They diverge on capability: Eclipse covers Java development environment, Userscripts covers Built-in script editor.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 17 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Eclipse and Userscripts actually diverge.
| Attribute | Eclipse | Userscripts |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | open-source |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Safari, macOS, iOS |
| Category | Technology | Browser Extensions |
| Founded | 2001 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Eclipse
- Java development environment
- Extensible plugin architecture
- Integrated debugger
- Code refactoring
- Version control integration
- Build automation
- Multi-language support
- Rich client platform
Only in Userscripts
- Built-in script editor
- Standard metadata support
- GM API
- Remote script updating
- iCloud sync
- Per-page popup
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Eclipse
- Java application developmentnot Userscripts
- Enterprise software developmentnot Userscripts
- Web application developmentnot Userscripts
- Plugin developmentnot Userscripts
- Educational programmingnot Userscripts
Userscripts
- Running userscripts on Safari without paying for Tampermonkeynot Eclipse
- Running userscripts on an iPhone or iPadnot Eclipse
- Writing scripts on a Mac and syncing them to iOSnot Eclipse
- Blocking or restyling site elements Safari content blockers cannot reachnot Eclipse
- Keeping a script library under an open-source licencenot Eclipse
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Eclipse
- High memory consumption and CPU usage, especially with multiple plugins installed
- Slow startup times and performance degradation with large projects or many open editors
- Requires configuration of eclipse.ini file to optimize heap sizes for adequate performance
- User interface considered outdated compared to modern IDE alternatives
- User base fell from 39% of Java developers in 2024 to 28% in 2025, indicating market decline
Userscripts
- Safari cannot let extensions bypass a site's Content Security Policy, so strict sites produce "Refused to execute a script" errors that the @inject-into workaround does not always fix.
- Apple only. There is no Chrome, Firefox or Edge build, so it cannot be a cross-browser answer.
- iCloud sync is documented as having delays, which is awkward when editing the same script on two devices.
- Requires macOS 12 and Safari 14.1, or iOS 15.1, so older Apple hardware is excluded.
- GPL v3 means a commercial licence is required for non-open-source use, which matters if you are embedding rather than just using it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Eclipse
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Eclipse review.
Userscripts
Free- FreeFree
- Full functionality
- GPL v3 licensed
- macOS, iOS and iPadOS
Which should you pick?
Choose Eclipse if
- You need java development environment.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want extensible plugin architecture.
Choose Userscripts if
- You need built-in script editor.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Safari, macOS, iOS.
- You also want standard metadata support.
Questions people ask
- Is Eclipse or Userscripts better?
- Neither clearly leads. Eclipse starts at Free and Userscripts at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Eclipse or Userscripts?
- Eclipse starts at Free and Userscripts at Free.
- Does Eclipse or Userscripts run on more platforms?
- Eclipse runs on Windows, macOS, Linux. Userscripts runs on Safari, macOS, iOS.
- Can I use Eclipse for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Eclipse best used for?
- Eclipse is most often used for java application development, enterprise software development, web application development, plugin development. Of those, java application development and enterprise software development are not what Userscripts is typically brought in for.
- What can Eclipse do that Userscripts cannot?
- Eclipse covers Java development environment, Extensible plugin architecture, Integrated debugger, Code refactoring. Userscripts covers Built-in script editor, Standard metadata support, GM API, Remote script updating.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Eclipse: How much does Eclipse IDE cost?
Eclipse IDE is completely free and open-source, released under the Eclipse Public License 2.0.
SourceUserscripts: Is Userscripts for Safari free?
Yes, free on the App Store and licensed under GPL v3. A commercial licence is required for use in something that is not itself open source.
SourceUserscripts: Does it work on iPhone?
Yes, on iOS and iPadOS 15.1 or later, which makes it one of the few ways to run userscripts on an iPhone.
SourceUserscripts: Why do I get "Refused to execute a script" errors?
Safari does not let extensions bypass a site's Content Security Policy the way other browsers do. The documented workaround is changing the script's @inject-into setting, though it does not resolve every case.
SourceUserscripts: Do my scripts sync between Mac and iPhone?
Yes, over iCloud, though the project notes the sync can be delayed rather than immediate.
SourceUserscripts: What are the system requirements?
macOS 12 or later with Safari 14.1 or later, or iOS and iPadOS 15.1 or later.
SourceRelated pages
More on Userscripts
Other head to heads
- Eclipse vs GitHub
- Eclipse vs JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA
- Eclipse vs Docker
- Eclipse vs Plane
- Eclipse vs Postgres
- Eclipse vs Storybook
- Eclipse vs Okta
- Eclipse vs Kubernetes
- Eclipse vs PostHog
- Eclipse vs Jira
- Eclipse vs Attio
- Eclipse vs CloudAMQP
- Eclipse vs Dropbox
- Eclipse vs Jenkins
- Eclipse vs Lovable
- Eclipse vs Miro
- Eclipse vs PyCharm
- Eclipse vs WebStorm
- Eclipse vs Stay
- Eclipse vs Violentmonkey
- Eclipse vs Tampermonkey
- Eclipse vs Greasemonkey
- Eclipse vs FireMonkey
- Eclipse vs Dark Reader
- Eclipse vs LanguageTool
- Eclipse vs uBlock Origin
- Eclipse vs Raindrop.io
- Eclipse vs BuiltWith
- Eclipse vs Keeper
- Eclipse vs Hemingway Editor
- Eclipse vs ProWritingAid
- Eclipse vs Rakuten
- Eclipse vs Night Eye
- Userscripts vs GitHub
- Userscripts vs JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA
- Userscripts vs Docker
- Userscripts vs Plane
- Userscripts vs Postgres
- Userscripts vs Storybook
- Userscripts vs Okta
- Userscripts vs Kubernetes
- Userscripts vs PostHog
- Userscripts vs Jira
- Userscripts vs Attio
- Userscripts vs CloudAMQP
- Userscripts vs Dropbox
- Userscripts vs Jenkins
- Userscripts vs Lovable
- Userscripts vs Miro
- Userscripts vs PyCharm
- Userscripts vs WebStorm
- Userscripts vs Stay
- Userscripts vs Violentmonkey
- Userscripts vs Tampermonkey
- Userscripts vs Greasemonkey
- Userscripts vs FireMonkey
- Userscripts vs Dark Reader
- Userscripts vs LanguageTool
- Userscripts vs uBlock Origin
- Userscripts vs Raindrop.io
- Userscripts vs BuiltWith
- Userscripts vs Keeper
- Userscripts vs Hemingway Editor
- Userscripts vs ProWritingAid
- Userscripts vs Rakuten
- Userscripts vs Night Eye
