Technology · head to head
Eclipse vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Eclipse
Technology
The Eclipse Foundation - home to a global community
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Cybersecurity
Enterprise endpoint security built into Microsoft 365
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Eclipse has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Eclipse high memory consumption and CPU usage, especially with multiple plugins installed; Microsoft Defender for Endpoint pricing not published on public websites; quote required from Microsoft sales
- They diverge on capability: Eclipse covers Java development environment, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint covers Threat & vulnerability management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Eclipse and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint actually diverge.
| Attribute | Eclipse | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Unknown | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android |
| Category | Technology | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2001 | 1975 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Eclipse
- Java development environment
- Extensible plugin architecture
- Integrated debugger
- Code refactoring
- Version control integration
- Build automation
- Multi-language support
- Rich client platform
Only in Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Threat & vulnerability management
- Attack surface reduction
- Next-gen protection
- EDR
- Auto investigation
- Microsoft Threat Experts
- Threat analytics
- Secure score
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Eclipse
- Java application developmentnot Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Enterprise software developmentnot Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Web application developmentnot Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Plugin developmentnot Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Educational programmingnot Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Enterprise endpoint security across Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS via Plans 1 or 2not Eclipse
- Small and medium-sized businesses using Microsoft Defender for Business as alternativenot Eclipse
- Organisations using Microsoft 365 E5 which includes Defender for Endpoint Plan 2not Eclipse
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Eclipse
- High memory consumption and CPU usage, especially with multiple plugins installed
- Slow startup times and performance degradation with large projects or many open editors
- Requires configuration of eclipse.ini file to optimize heap sizes for adequate performance
- User interface considered outdated compared to modern IDE alternatives
- User base fell from 39% of Java developers in 2024 to 28% in 2025, indicating market decline
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Pricing not published on public websites; quote required from Microsoft sales
- Defender for Endpoint Plan 1 and Plan 2 do not include server licenses; additional licensing required for server protection
- Specific feature differences between Plan 1 and Plan 2 require consulting Microsoft documentation
Pricing, plan by plan
Eclipse
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Eclipse review.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Microsoft Defender for Endpoint review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Eclipse if
- You need java development environment.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want extensible plugin architecture.
Choose Microsoft Defender for Endpoint if
- You need threat & vulnerability management.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
- You also want attack surface reduction.
Questions people ask
- Is Eclipse or Microsoft Defender for Endpoint better?
- Neither clearly leads. Eclipse starts at Free and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Eclipse or Microsoft Defender for Endpoint?
- Eclipse has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Eclipse and On request for Microsoft Defender for Endpoint.
- Does Eclipse or Microsoft Defender for Endpoint run on more platforms?
- Eclipse runs on Windows, macOS, Linux. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Eclipse for free?
- Yes. Eclipse has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint starts at On request.
- What is Eclipse best used for?
- Eclipse is most often used for java application development, enterprise software development, web application development, plugin development. Of those, java application development and enterprise software development are not what Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is typically brought in for.
- What can Eclipse do that Microsoft Defender for Endpoint cannot?
- Eclipse covers Java development environment, Extensible plugin architecture, Integrated debugger, Code refactoring. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint covers Threat & vulnerability management, Attack surface reduction, Next-gen protection, EDR.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Eclipse: How much does Eclipse IDE cost?
Eclipse IDE is completely free and open-source, released under the Eclipse Public License 2.0.
SourceMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint: How is Microsoft Defender for Endpoint priced?
Defender for Endpoint is bundled into Microsoft 365 enterprise subscriptions. Plan 1 is included in Microsoft 365 E3, and Plan 2 is included in Microsoft 365 E5. Individual pricing is not published separately.
SourceMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint: Does Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offer a trial?
Yes. A free trial is available for prospective customers to test the product before committing to a subscription.
SourceMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint: What is the difference between Plan 1 and Plan 2?
Plan 1 (in E3) includes unified security tools, device controls, network protection, firewall, web/URL controls, APIs, SIEM connectors, and app controls. Plan 2 (in E5) adds endpoint detection and response, deception techniques, automatic attack disruption, exposure management, and threat intelligence.
SourceRelated pages
More on Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Other head to heads
- Eclipse vs GitHub
- Eclipse vs JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA
- Eclipse vs Docker
- Eclipse vs Plane
- Eclipse vs Postgres
- Eclipse vs Storybook
- Eclipse vs Okta
- Eclipse vs Kubernetes
- Eclipse vs PostHog
- Eclipse vs Jira
- Eclipse vs LogRocket
- Eclipse vs Neovim
- Eclipse vs UptimeRobot
- Eclipse vs Vercel
- Eclipse vs Zeta
- Eclipse vs Attio
- Eclipse vs PyCharm
- Eclipse vs WebStorm
- Eclipse vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Eclipse vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Eclipse vs 1Password
- Eclipse vs Norton 360
- Eclipse vs LastPass
- Eclipse vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Eclipse vs VMware Carbon Black
- Eclipse vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Eclipse vs Sophos Intercept X
- Eclipse vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Eclipse vs Darktrace
- Eclipse vs Akeyless
- Eclipse vs DataGrail
- Eclipse vs Delinea
- Eclipse vs Doppler
- Eclipse vs Envysion
- Eclipse vs Feedzai
- Eclipse vs SentinelOne
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs GitHub
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Docker
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Plane
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Postgres
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Storybook
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Okta
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Kubernetes
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs PostHog
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Jira
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs LogRocket
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Neovim
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs UptimeRobot
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Vercel
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Zeta
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Attio
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs PyCharm
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WebStorm
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs 1Password
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Norton 360
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs LastPass
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs VMware Carbon Black
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Sophos Intercept X
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Darktrace
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Akeyless
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs DataGrail
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Delinea
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Doppler
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Envysion
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Feedzai
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs SentinelOne
