Softwr

Software Development · head to head

Drizzle ORM vs Syft

Drizzle ORM logo

Drizzle ORM

Software Development

Headless TypeScript ORM and SQL query builder

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Syft logo

Syft

Cybersecurity

Generates a software bill of materials from images, filesystems and archives

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Drizzle ORM it is entirely community/sponsor-funded with no official paid support tier for enterprises needing SLAs.; Syft lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.
  • They diverge on capability: Drizzle ORM covers Type-safe query builder, Syft covers Multi-format output.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Drizzle ORM and Syft actually diverge.

Attributes where Drizzle ORM and Syft differ
AttributeDrizzle ORMSyft
Pricing modelopen-sourceOpen source, no licence fee
Platformsweb, apimacOS, Linux, Windows, Docker
CategorySoftware DevelopmentCybersecurity

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Drizzle ORM

  • Type-safe query builder
  • Schema migrations
  • Drizzle Studio
  • Multi-database support
  • Serverless-ready drivers
  • Zero dependencies

Only in Syft

  • Multi-format output
  • Broad ecosystem coverage
  • Binary classifiers
  • In-toto attestations
  • Library and CLI
  • Pairs with Grype

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Drizzle ORM

  • Type-safe database access in TypeScript backendsnot Syft
  • Serverless and edge applications needing lightweight database driversnot Syft
  • Teams migrating from raw SQL for better type safetynot Syft
  • Projects wanting SQL-like control without a heavy ORM abstractionnot Syft

Syft

  • Producing a bill of materials for a customer or regulator that requires onenot Drizzle ORM
  • Feeding an inventory into a vulnerability scanner rather than scanning images directlynot Drizzle ORM
  • Recording what shipped in a build so a future disclosure can be answered quicklynot Drizzle ORM
  • Public sector work where an SBOM is a contractual deliverablenot Drizzle ORM

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Drizzle ORM

  • It is entirely community/sponsor-funded with no official paid support tier for enterprises needing SLAs.
  • The relational query API is newer than the SQL-like API and has historically had fewer advanced features.
  • Documentation and ecosystem tooling are less mature than Prisma's, which has a larger community and GUI ecosystem.
  • MSSQL and CockroachCB support are newer additions still stabilizing toward a 1.0 release.

Syft

  • Lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.
  • Fidelity varies sharply by ecosystem. Conan for C and C++, Haskell and Terraform get cataloguer support with no licence data, no dependency relationships and no file ownership, so a C and C++ shop gets the least from it.
  • Binary classification yields no licence or dependency metadata, and vendored or statically linked code is exactly where supply chain risk hides, so the blind spot and the risk overlap.
  • Incorrect CPE values and CPE collisions are recorded as open issues, and since Grype matches on CPE and PURL, an inventory error becomes a false negative in the security report downstream.
  • An inventory is not a risk assessment. Even a perfect bill of materials says a vulnerable version is present, never that the vulnerable function is called, and the triage burden lands entirely on the reader.

Pricing, plan by plan

Drizzle ORM

Free
  • Open SourceFree
    • Full ORM and query builder
    • drizzle-kit migrations
    • Drizzle Studio

Syft

Free
  • SyftFree
    • Apache-2.0
    • No usage limits
    • Community support
  • Anchore Enterprise$undefined/year
    • Policy enforcement and reporting
    • Federal and commercial tiers
    • Pricing not published, quoted on request

Which should you pick?

Choose Drizzle ORM if

  • You need type-safe query builder.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on web, api.
  • You also want schema migrations.
Drizzle ORM review

Choose Syft if

  • You need multi-format output.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
  • You also want broad ecosystem coverage.
Syft review

Questions people ask

Is Drizzle ORM or Syft better?
Neither clearly leads. Drizzle ORM starts at Free and Syft at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Drizzle ORM or Syft?
Drizzle ORM starts at Free and Syft at Free.
Does Drizzle ORM or Syft run on more platforms?
Drizzle ORM runs on web, api. Syft runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
Can I use Drizzle ORM for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Drizzle ORM best used for?
Drizzle ORM is most often used for type-safe database access in typescript backends, serverless and edge applications needing lightweight database drivers, teams migrating from raw sql for better type safety, projects wanting sql-like control without a heavy orm abstraction. Of those, type-safe database access in typescript backends and serverless and edge applications needing lightweight database drivers are not what Syft is typically brought in for.
What can Drizzle ORM do that Syft cannot?
Drizzle ORM covers Type-safe query builder, Schema migrations, Drizzle Studio, Multi-database support. Syft covers Multi-format output, Broad ecosystem coverage, Binary classifiers, In-toto attestations.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Drizzle ORM: What does Drizzle ORM cost?

Drizzle ORM is completely free and open-source with no licensing fees; the team accepts community sponsorships and contributions rather than charging for the software.

Source
Syft: Does Syft find vulnerabilities?

No. It produces an inventory. Grype, from the same company, matches that inventory against vulnerability feeds. They are separate tools and the distinction is frequently lost.

Drizzle ORM: Which databases does Drizzle support?

Drizzle supports PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite, MSSQL, CockroachDB and SingleStore, with specialized drivers for providers like Neon, Supabase, Vercel Postgres and Turso.

Source
Syft: Does anything in the Anchore stack do reachability analysis?

No. Neither Syft, Grype nor the commercial Anchore platform performs call graph or reachability analysis, so none of them tells you whether a vulnerable code path is actually invoked.

Drizzle ORM: Does Drizzle include migration tooling?

Yes, the drizzle-kit CLI provides generate, push, pull and check commands for managing schema migrations, and Drizzle Studio offers a visual way to browse and edit data.

Source
Syft: Is it a CNCF or OpenSSF project?

No. It is single-vendor open source owned by Anchore, with no foundation governance. That is a different licence risk profile from Sigstore.

Syft: What does Anchore Enterprise cost?

Not published. The pricing page is contact-sales only, with named but unpriced commercial and federal tiers.

Syft: How do I know my SBOM is complete?

You largely cannot, which is the honest answer. Silent partial parsing is a known open defect, so a bill of materials used for compliance should be spot-checked against a known dependency list.

Share

Related pages

More on Drizzle ORM

More on Syft

Keep looking

Other head to heads