Web Development · head to head
.NET vs RAD Studio

.NET
Web Development
Free, cross-platform, open source developer platform
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

RAD Studio
Developer Tools
Cross-platform native app development with Delphi and C++Builder
- From
- $2000/perpetual
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only .NET has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: .NET .NET 8 and .NET 9 both reach end of support on 10 November 2026, per dotnet.microsoft.com/en-us/platform/support/policy (Aug 2026), forcing an upgrade to .NET 10 by that date; RAD Studio professional edition costs $2,000 for the perpetual license plus $599 for year one maintenance, totaling $2,599 before tax
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which .NET and RAD Studio actually diverge.
| Attribute | .NET | RAD Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $2000/perpetual |
| Pricing model | open-source | one-time |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Category | Web Development | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
.NET
- Web development with ASP.NET Core and Entity Frameworknot RAD Studio
- Cloud-native application development for Azurenot RAD Studio
- Mobile and desktop apps with .NET MAUI cross-platform frameworknot RAD Studio
- AI and machine learning applications using C#not RAD Studio
RAD Studio
- Building Windows desktop applications with VCL componentsnot .NET
- Creating iOS and Android apps from shared Delphi codebasenot .NET
- Connecting to Oracle databases through FireDAC connectivitynot .NET
- Building REST web services that run on Linux serversnot .NET
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
.NET
- .NET 8 and .NET 9 both reach end of support on 10 November 2026, per dotnet.microsoft.com/en-us/platform/support/policy (Aug 2026), forcing an upgrade to .NET 10 by that date
- Standard Term Support releases get only 2 years of patches versus 3 years for Long Term Support releases, per Microsoft's own support policy page, so teams on an STS release face a shorter upgrade cycle
RAD Studio
- Professional edition costs $2,000 for the perpetual license plus $599 for year one maintenance, totaling $2,599 before tax
- Enterprise edition steps up to $3,400 license plus $1,199 maintenance, and Architect edition to $4,416 license plus $2,183 maintenance
- The perpetual license only entitles the buyer to updates for one year; continued access to new updates and upgrades requires an annually renewable Update Subscription
Pricing, plan by plan
.NET
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the .NET review.
RAD Studio
$2000/perpetual- Professional Edition$2000/perpetual
- Perpetual License
- First year maintenance $599
- Total $2,599 + Tax
- Enterprise Edition$3400/perpetual
- Perpetual License
- First year maintenance $1,199
- Total $4,599 + Tax
- Architect Edition$4416/perpetual
- Perpetual License
- First year maintenance $2,183
- Total $6,599 + Tax
Which should you pick?
Choose RAD Studio if
Nothing in the data separates RAD Studio from .NET on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is .NET or RAD Studio better?
- Neither clearly leads. .NET starts at Free and RAD Studio at $2000/perpetual, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, .NET or RAD Studio?
- .NET has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for .NET and $2000/perpetual for RAD Studio.
- Does .NET or RAD Studio run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use .NET for free?
- Yes. .NET has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. RAD Studio starts at $2000/perpetual.
- What is .NET best used for?
- .NET is most often used for web development with asp.net core and entity framework, cloud-native application development for azure, mobile and desktop apps with .net maui cross-platform framework, ai and machine learning applications using c#. Of those, web development with asp.net core and entity framework and cloud-native application development for azure are not what RAD Studio is typically brought in for.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
.NET: Is .NET free to use?
Yes. .NET is completely free and open-source, available on GitHub.
SourceRAD Studio: How much does RAD Studio cost?
RAD Studio uses perpetual licensing: Professional Edition $2,000 perpetual license + $599 first year maintenance ($2,599 total + tax). Enterprise Edition $3,400 license + $1,199 maintenance ($4,599 total + tax). Architect Edition $4,416 license + $2,183 maintenance ($6,599 total + tax).
Source.NET: What platforms does .NET support?
.NET supports Windows, Linux, macOS, and Docker. A single C# codebase can run across multiple platforms including iOS, Android, and cloud environments.
SourceRAD Studio: What is the difference between RAD Studio editions?
Professional Edition ($2,599 total + tax) targets individual developers. Enterprise Edition ($4,599 total + tax) adds multi-tier app capabilities. Architect Edition ($6,599 total + tax) includes advanced database and cloud features. All three include perpetual licenses.
Source.NET: How large is the .NET ecosystem?
NuGet provides 390,000+ unique packages with 50,000+ new packages added annually. .NET has 474K+ GitHub stars and active community support across multiple platforms.
SourceRAD Studio: Does RAD Studio offer Kai AI integration and discounts?
Yes, adding Kai AI to any edition provides discounts: 25% off Professional ($2,136 + tax), 30% off Enterprise ($3,394 + tax), and 40% off Architect ($4,109 + tax). This promotion is active through August 31, 2026.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- .NET vs Next.js
- .NET vs Django
- .NET vs MySQL
- .NET vs Flask
- .NET vs PHP
- .NET vs TypeScript
- .NET vs Docusaurus
- .NET vs MUI
- .NET vs React
- .NET vs Vue.js
- .NET vs Tailwind CSS
- .NET vs Angular
- .NET vs Radix UI
- .NET vs Remix
- .NET vs shadcn/ui
- .NET vs Chakra UI
- .NET vs esbuild
- .NET vs npm
- .NET vs CLion
- .NET vs GNAT Pro
- .NET vs Rust
- .NET vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- .NET vs Visual Studio Code
- .NET vs JetBrains Rider
- .NET vs StackBlitz
- .NET vs Visual Studio
- .NET vs Penpot
- .NET vs GitLab CI/CD
- .NET vs Helm
- .NET vs Notepad++
- .NET vs Pants Build
- .NET vs Swagger UI
- .NET vs Yarn
- .NET vs Ansible
- .NET vs Buildkite
- .NET vs Helix
- RAD Studio vs Next.js
- RAD Studio vs Django
- RAD Studio vs MySQL
- RAD Studio vs Flask
- RAD Studio vs PHP
- RAD Studio vs TypeScript
- RAD Studio vs Docusaurus
- RAD Studio vs MUI
- RAD Studio vs React
- RAD Studio vs Vue.js
- RAD Studio vs Tailwind CSS
- RAD Studio vs Angular
- RAD Studio vs Radix UI
- RAD Studio vs Remix
- RAD Studio vs shadcn/ui
- RAD Studio vs Chakra UI
- RAD Studio vs esbuild
- RAD Studio vs npm
- RAD Studio vs CLion
- RAD Studio vs GNAT Pro
- RAD Studio vs Rust
- RAD Studio vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- RAD Studio vs Visual Studio Code
- RAD Studio vs JetBrains Rider
- RAD Studio vs StackBlitz
- RAD Studio vs Visual Studio
- RAD Studio vs Penpot
- RAD Studio vs GitLab CI/CD
- RAD Studio vs Helm
- RAD Studio vs Notepad++
- RAD Studio vs Pants Build
- RAD Studio vs Swagger UI
- RAD Studio vs Yarn
- RAD Studio vs Ansible
- RAD Studio vs Buildkite
- RAD Studio vs Helix
