Cloud · head to head
DeepInfra vs HAProxy

DeepInfra
Cloud
Low-cost cloud API for running open-source AI models
- From
- $0.08/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only HAProxy has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: DeepInfra focuses on inference hosting rather than fine-tuning or full training pipelines that competitors like Fireworks AI offer.; HAProxy configuration syntax is dense and unforgiving, with a steep initial learning curve
- They diverge on capability: DeepInfra covers Open model hosting, HAProxy covers High throughput.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DeepInfra and HAProxy actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DeepInfra
- Open model hosting
- Pay-per-token pricing
- Long context support
- DeepCluster
- Zero retention policy
- Real-time metrics
Only in HAProxy
- High throughput
- Layer 4 and 7
- Health checking
- Rate limiting and ACLs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DeepInfra
- Running open-source LLM inference without managing GPUsnot HAProxy
- Serving speech and image generation models via APInot HAProxy
- Cost-sensitive production inference at scalenot HAProxy
- Reserved GPU capacity via DeepCluster for steady workloadsnot HAProxy
HAProxy
- Load balancing at traffic levels where proxy efficiency shows up in the hardware billnot DeepInfra
- Precise traffic control — rate limits, sticky sessions, complex routing rulesnot DeepInfra
- TCP load balancing for databases and non-HTTP servicesnot DeepInfra
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DeepInfra
- Focuses on inference hosting rather than fine-tuning or full training pipelines that competitors like Fireworks AI offer.
- Model selection is limited to what DeepInfra chooses to host, unlike self-managed platforms.
- No published free tier; usage is billed from the first token.
HAProxy
- Configuration syntax is dense and unforgiving, with a steep initial learning curve
- No automatic certificate management, unlike newer servers that treat it as default behaviour
- The built-in stats page is basic, so real observability needs exporters and dashboards
- A dedicated load balancer is more machinery than small deployments need
Pricing, plan by plan
DeepInfra
$0.08/month- Pay-as-you-go$undefined/mo
- Per-model token pricing from $0.08 to $2.85 per million input tokens
- No long-term contract
- DeepCluster$1.98/month
- Dedicated NVIDIA B300 GPU clusters at $1.98/GPU-hour
HAProxy
Free- HAProxyFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose DeepInfra if
- You need open model hosting.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want pay-per-token pricing.
Choose HAProxy if
- You need high throughput.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want layer 4 and 7.
Questions people ask
- Is DeepInfra or HAProxy better?
- Neither clearly leads. DeepInfra starts at $0.08/month and HAProxy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DeepInfra or HAProxy?
- HAProxy has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $0.08/month for DeepInfra and Free for HAProxy.
- Does DeepInfra or HAProxy run on more platforms?
- DeepInfra runs on web, api. HAProxy runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- Can I use HAProxy for free?
- Yes. HAProxy has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. DeepInfra starts at $0.08/month.
- What is DeepInfra best used for?
- DeepInfra is most often used for running open-source llm inference without managing gpus, serving speech and image generation models via api, cost-sensitive production inference at scale, reserved gpu capacity via deepcluster for steady workloads. Of those, running open-source llm inference without managing gpus and serving speech and image generation models via api are not what HAProxy is typically brought in for.
- What can DeepInfra do that HAProxy cannot?
- DeepInfra covers Open model hosting, Pay-per-token pricing, Long context support, DeepCluster. HAProxy covers High throughput, Layer 4 and 7, Health checking, Rate limiting and ACLs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
DeepInfra: Is there a free tier on DeepInfra?
No free tier is published; usage is billed pay-as-you-go from the first token, though a credit card or pre-payment is required before you can send requests.
SourceHAProxy: Is HAProxy free?
Yes, the community version is open source. HAProxy Technologies sells HAProxy Enterprise separately.
DeepInfra: How is usage priced?
Language models are billed per million input/output tokens, other models by inference execution time, and audio models per minute of audio processed, with no minimum commitment.
SourceHAProxy: HAProxy or Nginx?
HAProxy is a specialist load balancer with deeper balancing and health-check features. Nginx also serves static content and is more approachable, which is why it is more common as a general web server.
DeepInfra: What are the Standard, Priority, and Flex tiers?
Standard is default best-effort pricing at 1x, Priority costs 1.5x for faster time-to-first-token during peak demand, and Flex costs 0.8x for non-production or asynchronous workloads.
SourceHAProxy: Does HAProxy handle TLS certificates automatically?
No. Certificate issuance and renewal are external, unlike Caddy where it is automatic.
DeepInfra: How does billing scale with spend?
Accounts advance through usage tiers as cumulative payments cross $20, $100, $500, $2,000, and $10,000 thresholds, with invoices generated monthly or at each threshold.
SourceDeepInfra: Is there a limit on concurrent requests?
Yes, accounts are limited to 200 concurrent requests by default, though spending limits can also be configured to prevent unexpected charges.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- DeepInfra vs Grafana Cloud
- DeepInfra vs Neon
- DeepInfra vs DigitalOcean
- DeepInfra vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- DeepInfra vs Pulumi
- DeepInfra vs Fly.io
- DeepInfra vs Anyscale
- DeepInfra vs Fireworks AI
- DeepInfra vs Podman
- DeepInfra vs Railway
- DeepInfra vs Render
- DeepInfra vs Vault
- DeepInfra vs Wiz
- DeepInfra vs Beam Cloud
- DeepInfra vs Cerebrium
- DeepInfra vs Go
- DeepInfra vs Azure Functions
- DeepInfra vs Caddy
- HAProxy vs Grafana Cloud
- HAProxy vs Neon
- HAProxy vs DigitalOcean
- HAProxy vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- HAProxy vs Pulumi
- HAProxy vs Fly.io
- HAProxy vs Anyscale
- HAProxy vs Fireworks AI
- HAProxy vs Podman
- HAProxy vs Railway
- HAProxy vs Render
- HAProxy vs Vault
- HAProxy vs Wiz
- HAProxy vs Beam Cloud
- HAProxy vs Cerebrium
- HAProxy vs Go
- HAProxy vs Azure Functions
- HAProxy vs Caddy

