Machine Learning · head to head
Dataiku vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Dataiku
Machine Learning
Browser-based platform where visual data preparation and written code share one pipeline
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Cybersecurity
Enterprise endpoint security built into Microsoft 365
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Dataiku has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Dataiku visual recipes are stored as Dataiku's own configuration and do not export as runnable SQL or Python, so a Flow with hundreds of visual steps has to be rebuilt from scratch if the organisation ever leaves, and that cost rises with every project added.; Microsoft Defender for Endpoint pricing not published on public websites; quote required from Microsoft sales
- They diverge on capability: Dataiku covers Visual Flow, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint covers Threat & vulnerability management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Dataiku and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint actually diverge.
| Attribute | Dataiku | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Linux, Mac, Windows, Web | Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android |
| Category | Machine Learning | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2013 | 1975 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Dataiku
- Visual Flow
- Visual recipes
- Code recipes and notebooks
- Computation pushdown
- Automated machine learning
- Scenarios
- Node topology
- Governance features
Only in Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Threat & vulnerability management
- Attack surface reduction
- Next-gen protection
- EDR
- Auto investigation
- Microsoft Threat Experts
- Threat analytics
- Secure score
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Dataiku
- Organisations where analysts and data scientists must collaborate on the same pipeline rather than exchanging extractsnot Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Regulated model risk environments needing documented lineage, sign-off and a record of how a production model was producednot Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Pushing heavy transformations down into a cloud warehouse while keeping the pipeline definition in one reviewable placenot Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Large enterprises replacing a sprawl of spreadsheets and unmanaged scripts with something a governance function will acceptnot Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Enterprise endpoint security across Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS via Plans 1 or 2not Dataiku
- Small and medium-sized businesses using Microsoft Defender for Business as alternativenot Dataiku
- Organisations using Microsoft 365 E5 which includes Defender for Endpoint Plan 2not Dataiku
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Dataiku
- Visual recipes are stored as Dataiku's own configuration and do not export as runnable SQL or Python, so a Flow with hundreds of visual steps has to be rebuilt from scratch if the organisation ever leaves, and that cost rises with every project added.
- Production requires separate automation and API nodes, each installed and licensed, so the figure quoted for building models is not the figure for running them.
- Licensing is per user across tiers, and the lower tiers are constrained enough that occasional contributors frequently end up needing a full seat, which makes a wide rollout cost more than the initial estimate suggested.
- A self-hosted installation needs a dedicated administrator for upgrades, connection management, permissions and node topology, so the licence is a fraction of the real cost of ownership.
- Computation pushes down to the warehouse or Spark cluster where it is billed by that provider, so a platform sold on making analysts self-sufficient can generate a large warehouse bill that nobody attributes back to it.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Pricing not published on public websites; quote required from Microsoft sales
- Defender for Endpoint Plan 1 and Plan 2 do not include server licenses; additional licensing required for server protection
- Specific feature differences between Plan 1 and Plan 2 require consulting Microsoft documentation
Pricing, plan by plan
Dataiku
Free- Free EditionFree
- Single user
- Core features
- EnterpriseFree
- Full platform
- Collaboration
- MLOps
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Microsoft Defender for Endpoint review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Dataiku if
- You need visual flow.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Mac, Windows, Web.
- You also want visual recipes.
Choose Microsoft Defender for Endpoint if
- You need threat & vulnerability management.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
- You also want attack surface reduction.
Questions people ask
- Is Dataiku or Microsoft Defender for Endpoint better?
- Neither clearly leads. Dataiku starts at Free and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Dataiku or Microsoft Defender for Endpoint?
- Dataiku has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Dataiku and On request for Microsoft Defender for Endpoint.
- Does Dataiku or Microsoft Defender for Endpoint run on more platforms?
- Dataiku runs on Linux, Mac, Windows, Web. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Dataiku for free?
- Yes. Dataiku has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint starts at On request.
- What is Dataiku best used for?
- Dataiku is most often used for organisations where analysts and data scientists must collaborate on the same pipeline rather than exchanging extracts, regulated model risk environments needing documented lineage, sign-off and a record of how a production model was produced, pushing heavy transformations down into a cloud warehouse while keeping the pipeline definition in one reviewable place, large enterprises replacing a sprawl of spreadsheets and unmanaged scripts with something a governance function will accept. Of those, organisations where analysts and data scientists must collaborate on the same pipeline rather than exchanging extracts and regulated model risk environments needing documented lineage, sign-off and a record of how a production model was produced are not what Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is typically brought in for.
- What can Dataiku do that Microsoft Defender for Endpoint cannot?
- Dataiku covers Visual Flow, Visual recipes, Code recipes and notebooks, Computation pushdown. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint covers Threat & vulnerability management, Attack surface reduction, Next-gen protection, EDR.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Dataiku: Is there a free version?
There is a free edition with limits on users and features, adequate for evaluation and personal work. Anything a team runs in production is a negotiated commercial agreement.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: How is Microsoft Defender for Endpoint priced?
Defender for Endpoint is bundled into Microsoft 365 enterprise subscriptions. Plan 1 is included in Microsoft 365 E3, and Plan 2 is included in Microsoft 365 E5. Individual pricing is not published separately.
SourceDataiku: Do I have to write code to use it?
No. That is the premise. An analyst can build a complete pipeline through visual recipes, and a data scientist can write Python next to it in the same Flow.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: Does Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offer a trial?
Yes. A free trial is available for prospective customers to test the product before committing to a subscription.
SourceDataiku: Where does the computation actually run?
Wherever you connect it. Transformations are pushed down into the warehouse, database or Spark cluster where the data lives, which is efficient and also means the compute cost appears on that provider's bill rather than Dataiku's.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: What is the difference between Plan 1 and Plan 2?
Plan 1 (in E3) includes unified security tools, device controls, network protection, firewall, web/URL controls, APIs, SIEM connectors, and app controls. Plan 2 (in E5) adds endpoint detection and response, deception techniques, automatic attack disruption, exposure management, and threat intelligence.
SourceDataiku: Can I export my work if we leave?
Code recipes are your code and leave with you. Visual recipes do not export as equivalent code, so the visual portion of a Flow has to be reimplemented, and that portion tends to be the majority in the projects where the platform succeeded best.
Dataiku: Self-hosted or cloud?
Both are offered. Self-hosting gives control over data residency and networking and requires an administrator; the managed cloud removes that work and moves the constraint to what the vendor's environment supports.
Related pages
More on Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Other head to heads
- Dataiku vs Azure Machine Learning
- Dataiku vs DataRobot
- Dataiku vs AWS SageMaker
- Dataiku vs Anaconda
- Dataiku vs Google Vertex AI
- Dataiku vs RapidMiner
- Dataiku vs Domino Data Lab
- Dataiku vs KNIME
- Dataiku vs Weights & Biases
- Dataiku vs Neptune.ai
- Dataiku vs ClearML
- Dataiku vs Python
- Dataiku vs Groq
- Dataiku vs Haystack
- Dataiku vs IBM SPSS
- Dataiku vs JMP
- Dataiku vs Minitab
- Dataiku vs Mistral AI
- Dataiku vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Dataiku vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Dataiku vs 1Password
- Dataiku vs Norton 360
- Dataiku vs LastPass
- Dataiku vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Dataiku vs VMware Carbon Black
- Dataiku vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Dataiku vs Sophos Intercept X
- Dataiku vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Dataiku vs Darktrace
- Dataiku vs Akeyless
- Dataiku vs DataGrail
- Dataiku vs Delinea
- Dataiku vs Doppler
- Dataiku vs Envysion
- Dataiku vs Feedzai
- Dataiku vs SentinelOne
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Azure Machine Learning
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs DataRobot
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs AWS SageMaker
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Anaconda
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Google Vertex AI
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs RapidMiner
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Domino Data Lab
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs KNIME
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Weights & Biases
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Neptune.ai
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs ClearML
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Python
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Groq
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Haystack
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs IBM SPSS
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs JMP
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Minitab
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Mistral AI
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs 1Password
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Norton 360
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs LastPass
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs VMware Carbon Black
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Sophos Intercept X
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Darktrace
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Akeyless
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs DataGrail
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Delinea
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Doppler
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Envysion
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Feedzai
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs SentinelOne
