Machine Learning · head to head
Dataiku vs Grafana Loki
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Dataiku no pricing is published at any tier, and the plans page carries no figures at all; Grafana Loki grafana Cloud Logs Pro plan includes only 30-day retention; retention beyond 30 days requires Enterprise plan with minimum $25,000 annual commitment
- They diverge on capability: Dataiku covers Visual data prep, Grafana Loki covers Log aggregation.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Dataiku and Grafana Loki actually diverge.
| Attribute | Dataiku | Grafana Loki |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Linux, Mac, Windows, Web | Self-hosted (open source), Managed (Grafana Cloud Logs), Enterprise (self-managed with support) |
| Category | Machine Learning | Logging |
| Founded | 2013 | 2014 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Dataiku
- Visual data prep
- AutoML
- MLOps
- Collaboration
- Governence
- Python
- R
- Spark
Only in Grafana Loki
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- LogQL language
- Cost-effective
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Api support
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Dataiku
- Building and deploying data science and machine learning pipelinesnot Grafana Loki
- Giving analysts and data scientists a shared visual and code environmentnot Grafana Loki
Grafana Loki
- Cost-sensitive organisations deploying Kubernetes and Prometheus ecosystemsnot Dataiku
- Teams needing index-free log aggregation for high-volume environmentsnot Dataiku
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Dataiku
- No pricing is published at any tier, and the plans page carries no figures at all
- User, row and compute limits are not stated, so nothing about scale can be assessed before contacting sales
- Access begins with a demo request or a trial rather than a self serve signup
Grafana Loki
- Grafana Cloud Logs Pro plan includes only 30-day retention; retention beyond 30 days requires Enterprise plan with minimum $25,000 annual commitment
- Open-source version requires self-hosting all infrastructure including storage and scaling
Pricing, plan by plan
Dataiku
Free- Free EditionFree
- Single user
- Core features
- EnterpriseFree
- Full platform
- Collaboration
- MLOps
Grafana Loki
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Grafana Loki review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Dataiku if
- You need visual data prep.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Mac, Windows, Web.
- You also want automl.
Choose Grafana Loki if
- You need log aggregation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted (open source), Managed (Grafana Cloud Logs), Enterprise (self-managed with support).
- You also want label-based indexing.
Questions people ask
- Is Dataiku or Grafana Loki better?
- Neither clearly leads. Dataiku starts at Free and Grafana Loki at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Dataiku or Grafana Loki?
- Dataiku starts at Free and Grafana Loki at Free.
- Does Dataiku or Grafana Loki run on more platforms?
- Dataiku runs on Linux, Mac, Windows, Web. Grafana Loki runs on Self-hosted (open source), Managed (Grafana Cloud Logs), Enterprise (self-managed with support).
- Can I use Dataiku for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Dataiku best used for?
- Dataiku is most often used for building and deploying data science and machine learning pipelines, giving analysts and data scientists a shared visual and code environment. Of those, building and deploying data science and machine learning pipelines and giving analysts and data scientists a shared visual and code environment are not what Grafana Loki is typically brought in for.
- What can Dataiku do that Grafana Loki cannot?
- Dataiku covers Visual data prep, AutoML, MLOps, Collaboration. Grafana Loki covers Log aggregation, Label-based indexing, LogQL language, Cost-effective. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Dataiku: What are Dataiku pricing tiers and costs?
Dataiku pricing information is not available on their public website. Customers must contact Dataiku sales directly to request pricing, trial access, and licensing information.
SourceGrafana Loki: Is there a free tier for Grafana Cloud?
Yes, Grafana Cloud has a Free Forever plan at no cost with no registration required. The free tier is suitable for personal projects and early-stage startups.
SourceDataiku: Does Dataiku offer a free tier or trial?
Free tier or trial availability for Dataiku cannot be determined from publicly accessible pages. Contact Dataiku directly to inquire about evaluation options.
SourceGrafana Loki: How long is data retained in Grafana's free plan?
The free tier retains metrics, logs, traces, and profiles for 14 days.
SourceGrafana Loki: What is the minimum cost for Grafana Enterprise?
Grafana Enterprise has a minimum annual commitment of 25,000 dollars.
SourceGrafana Loki: Do I need a credit card to use Grafana's free tier?
No, Grafana Cloud's Free Forever plan requires no credit card to get started.
SourceGrafana Loki: How is Grafana Cloud billed?
Grafana Cloud Pro starts at 19 dollars per month with usage-based charges on top. Billing is monthly based on your consumption. Grafana offers automatic volume discounts based on your spending.
SourceRelated pages
More on Grafana Loki
Other head to heads
- Dataiku vs AWS SageMaker
- Dataiku vs Google Vertex AI
- Dataiku vs Azure Machine Learning
- Dataiku vs DataRobot
- Dataiku vs MLflow
- Dataiku vs Snowflake
- Dataiku vs TensorFlow
- Dataiku vs Comet ML
- Dataiku vs Jupyter
- Dataiku vs LangChain
- Dataiku vs Pinecone
- Dataiku vs Python
- Dataiku vs PyTorch
- Dataiku vs scikit-learn
- Dataiku vs Apache Spark MLlib
- Dataiku vs Weaviate
- Dataiku vs Weights & Biases
- Dataiku vs Alteryx
- Dataiku vs Elastic Stack
- Dataiku vs New Relic
- Dataiku vs Datadog Logs
- Dataiku vs Coralogix
- Dataiku vs incident.io
- Dataiku vs Cronitor
- Dataiku vs FireHydrant
- Dataiku vs Healthchecks
- Dataiku vs Openstatus
- Dataiku vs Rootly
- Dataiku vs Checkly
- Dataiku vs CloudWatch
- Dataiku vs Dynatrace
- Dataiku vs InfluxDB
- Dataiku vs Airbrake
- Dataiku vs AppDynamics
- Dataiku vs Axiom
- Dataiku vs Azure Monitor
- Grafana Loki vs AWS SageMaker
- Grafana Loki vs Google Vertex AI
- Grafana Loki vs Azure Machine Learning
- Grafana Loki vs DataRobot
- Grafana Loki vs MLflow
- Grafana Loki vs Snowflake
- Grafana Loki vs TensorFlow
- Grafana Loki vs Comet ML
- Grafana Loki vs Jupyter
- Grafana Loki vs LangChain
- Grafana Loki vs Pinecone
- Grafana Loki vs Python
- Grafana Loki vs PyTorch
- Grafana Loki vs scikit-learn
- Grafana Loki vs Apache Spark MLlib
- Grafana Loki vs Weaviate
- Grafana Loki vs Weights & Biases
- Grafana Loki vs Alteryx
- Grafana Loki vs Elastic Stack
- Grafana Loki vs New Relic
- Grafana Loki vs Datadog Logs
- Grafana Loki vs Coralogix
- Grafana Loki vs incident.io
- Grafana Loki vs Cronitor
- Grafana Loki vs FireHydrant
- Grafana Loki vs Healthchecks
- Grafana Loki vs Openstatus
- Grafana Loki vs Rootly
- Grafana Loki vs Checkly
- Grafana Loki vs CloudWatch
- Grafana Loki vs Dynatrace
- Grafana Loki vs InfluxDB
- Grafana Loki vs Airbrake
- Grafana Loki vs AppDynamics
- Grafana Loki vs Axiom
- Grafana Loki vs Azure Monitor


