Developer Tools · head to head
Dagger vs Supabase

Dagger
Developer Tools
Programmable CI/CD engine that runs your pipeline as containers on any runner
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Dagger dagger is not a CI provider, so you keep paying for GitHub Actions or GitLab runners underneath it; the Dagger Cloud subscription is an addition to your CI bill, not a replacement for it.; Supabase free tier projects auto-pause after 1 week of inactivity
- They diverge on capability: Dagger covers Pipelines as code, Supabase covers PostgreSQL database.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Dagger and Supabase actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Dagger
- Pipelines as code
- Local and CI parity
- Content-addressed caching
- Dagger Functions and modules
- CI-provider agnostic
- Dagger Cloud traces
- GitHub Checks integration
- Container-native execution
Only in Supabase
- PostgreSQL database
- Auto-generated APIs
- Authentication & authorization
- Real-time subscriptions
- Storage
- Edge functions
- Vector embeddings
- Database migrations
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Dagger
- A platform team maintaining near-identical build YAML across forty repositories that wants one versioned module every repository calls insteadnot Supabase
- An engineering organisation migrating off a CI provider that does not want to rewrite every pipeline as part of the migrationnot Supabase
- A team whose engineers waste hours pushing commits to debug CI-only failures and needs to reproduce the exact run locallynot Supabase
- A monorepo where most commits touch a small subset of services and cache-accurate step skipping cuts build minutes materiallynot Supabase
Supabase
- Web application backends using Postgres plus auto-generated REST/GraphQL APIsnot Dagger
- Mobile app backends via Flutter/Swift/Kotlin client librariesnot Dagger
- AI applications using vector/embeddings storagenot Dagger
- Authentication with 20+ social providers plus email/passwordnot Dagger
- File and media storage (S3-compatible with CDN) and realtime sync over WebSocketsnot Dagger
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Dagger
- Dagger is not a CI provider, so you keep paying for GitHub Actions or GitLab runners underneath it; the Dagger Cloud subscription is an addition to your CI bill, not a replacement for it.
- Writing pipelines in Go or TypeScript raises the barrier to entry: a release engineer who could edit a YAML step now needs to read code, and the people who can fix a broken build shrink to those comfortable with the SDK.
- The engine runs as a container on the runner and needs a persistent cache volume to deliver its main benefit, so ephemeral CI runners give you correctness without the speed, and provisioning durable cache storage is extra platform work.
- The Team plan caps at ten users and ten million events per month; an organisation of any size crosses that quickly and moves to Enterprise pricing that is not published, so cost at scale is unknowable up front.
- The module ecosystem is young and thinly maintained relative to the marketplace of a mature CI provider, so integrations that exist as a one-line Action often have to be written yourself as a Dagger function.
Supabase
- Free tier projects auto-pause after 1 week of inactivity
- Free tier hard caps: 500 MB database, 1 GB file storage, 5 GB egress/month, 50,000 monthly active users, max 2 active free projects per organization
- Pro plan charges usage overages beyond included quotas, e.g. $0.00325 per MAU above 100,000 and $0.125/GB disk above 8 GB
- SOC2/ISO 27001 certification and HIPAA (add-on) compliance require the $599/month Team plan; not available on the $25/month Pro plan
Pricing, plan by plan
Dagger
Free- IndividualFree
- One user
- One million events per month
- Workflow logs and function call traces
- Team$50/month
- Up to ten users
- Ten million events per month
- Module insights and module catalogue
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom user and event limits
- SSO
- Managed single-tenant deployment
Supabase
Free- FreeFree
- 50,000 MAU
- 500MB database
- 5GB egress
- Pro$25/month
- 100,000 MAU
- 8GB disk
- 250GB egress
- Team$599/month
- SOC2 and ISO 27001
- HIPAA add-on
- 28-day log / 14-day backup retention
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Custom limits
- Dedicated support manager
- 24/7/365 support
Which should you pick?
Choose Dagger if
- You need pipelines as code.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted.
- You also want local and ci parity.
Choose Supabase if
- You need postgresql database.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want auto-generated apis.
Questions people ask
- Is Dagger or Supabase better?
- Neither clearly leads. Dagger starts at Free and Supabase at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Dagger or Supabase?
- Dagger starts at Free and Supabase at Free.
- Does Dagger or Supabase run on more platforms?
- Dagger runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted. Supabase runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Dagger for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Dagger best used for?
- Dagger is most often used for a platform team maintaining near-identical build yaml across forty repositories that wants one versioned module every repository calls instead, an engineering organisation migrating off a ci provider that does not want to rewrite every pipeline as part of the migration, a team whose engineers waste hours pushing commits to debug ci-only failures and needs to reproduce the exact run locally, a monorepo where most commits touch a small subset of services and cache-accurate step skipping cuts build minutes materially. Of those, a platform team maintaining near-identical build yaml across forty repositories that wants one versioned module every repository calls instead and an engineering organisation migrating off a ci provider that does not want to rewrite every pipeline as part of the migration are not what Supabase is typically brought in for.
- What can Dagger do that Supabase cannot?
- Dagger covers Pipelines as code, Local and CI parity, Content-addressed caching, Dagger Functions and modules. Supabase covers PostgreSQL database, Auto-generated APIs, Authentication & authorization, Real-time subscriptions.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Dagger: Does Dagger replace GitHub Actions?
No. Dagger runs inside GitHub Actions or any other CI. It replaces the YAML that describes your pipeline steps, not the trigger and runner layer.
Supabase: How much does Supabase cost?
Supabase offers a free tier and three paid plans. Pro starts at $25 per month, Team at $599 per month, and Enterprise requires a custom quote. All pricing is in USD charged monthly.
SourceDagger: Is the engine open source?
Yes, the Dagger engine and SDKs are open source and free. Dagger Cloud, the observability product, is what costs money.
Supabase: What are Supabase's usage overage fees?
Pro plan users pay $0.00325 per monthly active user over the 100,000 included, and $0.125 per GB for database storage exceeding 8 GB per project. Compute instances cost $10 to $3,730+ per month.
SourceDagger: What is an event in the pricing?
Dagger Cloud meters pipeline telemetry events. One million per month is free; the Team plan at 50 USD per month allows ten million.
Dagger: Can I run the same pipeline on my laptop?
Yes, that is the main reason teams adopt it. The dagger CLI executes the identical graph locally, so CI-only failures become reproducible.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Dagger vs Earthly
- Dagger vs Buildkite
- Dagger vs Tilt
- Dagger vs Nixpacks
- Dagger vs Depot
- Dagger vs Blacksmith
- Dagger vs WarpBuild
- Dagger vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Dagger vs Nx Cloud
- Dagger vs Namespace
- Dagger vs Pants Build
- Dagger vs Jitsu
- Dagger vs GoLand
- Dagger vs Hookdeck
- Dagger vs JFrog Artifactory
- Dagger vs Nix
- Dagger vs Asana
- Dagger vs ClickUp
- Dagger vs Figma
- Dagger vs Linear
- Dagger vs Postgres
- Dagger vs Redis
- Dagger vs Excalidraw
- Dagger vs MongoDB
- Dagger vs Notion
- Dagger vs PostHog
- Dagger vs GitHub
- Dagger vs Apache Hadoop
- Dagger vs Height
- Dagger vs Honeycomb
- Dagger vs Istio
- Dagger vs Lucidchart
- Dagger vs GitHub Desktop
- Supabase vs Earthly
- Supabase vs Buildkite
- Supabase vs Tilt
- Supabase vs Nixpacks
- Supabase vs Depot
- Supabase vs Blacksmith
- Supabase vs WarpBuild
- Supabase vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Supabase vs Nx Cloud
- Supabase vs Namespace
- Supabase vs Pants Build
- Supabase vs Jitsu
- Supabase vs GoLand
- Supabase vs Hookdeck
- Supabase vs JFrog Artifactory
- Supabase vs Nix
- Supabase vs Asana
- Supabase vs ClickUp
- Supabase vs Figma
- Supabase vs Linear
- Supabase vs Postgres
- Supabase vs Redis
- Supabase vs Excalidraw
- Supabase vs MongoDB
- Supabase vs Notion
- Supabase vs PostHog
- Supabase vs GitHub
- Supabase vs Apache Hadoop
- Supabase vs Height
- Supabase vs Honeycomb
- Supabase vs Istio
- Supabase vs Lucidchart
- Supabase vs GitHub Desktop

