Cybersecurity · head to head
CyberGhost VPN vs Refact
CyberGhost VPN
Cybersecurity
Consumer VPN operated from Romania and owned by Kape Technologies, with a no-logs claim audited by Deloitte.
- From
- $2.19/month
- Free plan
- No

Refact
Developer Tools
Autonomous AI coding agent for development tasks
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Refact has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: CyberGhost VPN kape Technologies, the parent, was formerly Crossrider, a browser extension platform whose technology was widely used to distribute adware, and Kape now also owns VPN review sites, so third-party rankings a buyer might use to verify the product can come from the same corporate group.; Refact requires configuration for optimal performance
- They diverge on capability: CyberGhost VPN covers NoSpy servers, Refact covers Autonomous agent workflows.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CyberGhost VPN and Refact actually diverge.
| Attribute | CyberGhost VPN | Refact |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $2.19/month | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | Freemium with paid tiers |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Desktop, Mobile | VS Code, Web |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
| Founded | 2011 | 2023 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CyberGhost VPN
- NoSpy servers
- Audited no-logs policy
- WireGuard, OpenVPN and IKEv2
- Streaming-labelled servers
- Dedicated IP via token
- Kill switch
- Split tunnelling
- Smart Rules
Only in Refact
- Autonomous agent workflows
- IDE chat
- Real-time code completions
- GitHub integration
- Database integration
- On-premise deployment
- Multi-LLM support
- 25+ language support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CyberGhost VPN
- A household that wants one subscription covering several devices for streaming and public Wi-Finot Refact
- A buyer who specifically wants a provider outside the Fourteen Eyes with a published third-party no-logs auditnot Refact
- Torrenting on a connection where the internet provider throttles or logs peer-to-peer trafficnot Refact
- Travellers needing to reach home-country services from abroad without configuring anything technicalnot Refact
Refact
- Autonomous code generation for development tasksnot CyberGhost VPN
- End-to-end bug fixes and refactoringnot CyberGhost VPN
- Multi-language software development accelerationnot CyberGhost VPN
- Enterprise development with data privacy requirementsnot CyberGhost VPN
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CyberGhost VPN
- Kape Technologies, the parent, was formerly Crossrider, a browser extension platform whose technology was widely used to distribute adware, and Kape now also owns VPN review sites, so third-party rankings a buyer might use to verify the product can come from the same corporate group.
- Pricing is structured so that the deep discount applies to the longest initial term and the standard rate applies at renewal, which means the figure used to make the decision is not the figure paid in year three unless the subscriber renegotiates or churns.
- The Deloitte engagement is point-in-time assurance over stated policy and server configuration, so it confirms things were as described when examined and says nothing about how the infrastructure behaves today or after an ownership change.
- Client capability differs sharply by platform: the Linux client is command-line only and lacks the kill switch and split tunnelling that the Windows client has, so a mixed-device household does not get the protection that reviews of the Windows app describe.
- Streaming-optimised server labels go stale because platforms block address ranges continually, and the practical support answer is to try a different server, which makes the labelled-server feature less dependable than the marketing implies.
Refact
- Requires configuration for optimal performance
- On-premise deployment adds operational complexity
- Free tier limited by daily agent request quota
- Coin system adds complexity to cost calculation
Pricing, plan by plan
CyberGhost VPN
$2.19/month- 1 Month$12.99/month
- 7 devices
- 9000+ servers
- Unlimited bandwidth
- 2 Years + 2 Months$2.19/month
- All features
- Best value
- 45-day guarantee
- 6 Months$6.99/month
- All features
- 45-day guarantee
Refact
Free- FreeFree
- Limited daily agent usage
- Unlimited completions
- 2,000 coins for agent and chat
- Pro$10/month
- 40 daily agent requests
- 64k context window
- 10,000 coins monthly
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- On-premise deployment
- Custom coin allocation
- Fine-tuning support
Which should you pick?
Choose CyberGhost VPN if
- You need nospy servers.
- You work on Web, Desktop, Mobile.
- You also want audited no-logs policy.
Choose Refact if
- You need autonomous agent workflows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on VS Code, Web.
- You also want ide chat.
Questions people ask
- Is CyberGhost VPN or Refact better?
- Neither clearly leads. CyberGhost VPN starts at $2.19/month and Refact at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CyberGhost VPN or Refact?
- Refact has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $2.19/month for CyberGhost VPN and Free for Refact.
- Does CyberGhost VPN or Refact run on more platforms?
- CyberGhost VPN runs on Web, Desktop, Mobile. Refact runs on VS Code, Web.
- Can I use Refact for free?
- Yes. Refact has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. CyberGhost VPN starts at $2.19/month.
- What is CyberGhost VPN best used for?
- CyberGhost VPN is most often used for a household that wants one subscription covering several devices for streaming and public wi-fi, a buyer who specifically wants a provider outside the fourteen eyes with a published third-party no-logs audit, torrenting on a connection where the internet provider throttles or logs peer-to-peer traffic, travellers needing to reach home-country services from abroad without configuring anything technical. Of those, a household that wants one subscription covering several devices for streaming and public wi-fi and a buyer who specifically wants a provider outside the fourteen eyes with a published third-party no-logs audit are not what Refact is typically brought in for.
- What can CyberGhost VPN do that Refact cannot?
- CyberGhost VPN covers NoSpy servers, Audited no-logs policy, WireGuard, OpenVPN and IKEv2, Streaming-labelled servers. Refact covers Autonomous agent workflows, IDE chat, Real-time code completions, GitHub integration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CyberGhost VPN: Who owns CyberGhost?
Kape Technologies, which acquired it in 2017. Kape was formerly called Crossrider and also owns ExpressVPN, Private Internet Access and Zenmate, plus the review sites vpnMentor and Wizcase.
Refact: How many programming languages does Refact support?
Refact supports 25+ programming languages including Python, JavaScript, Go, Rust, Java, C++, and many others.
SourceCyberGhost VPN: Has the no-logs claim been independently audited?
Yes. Deloitte has examined the no-logs policy and server configuration and published an assurance report. Note that this is a point-in-time engagement, not continuous monitoring.
Refact: Can I deploy Refact on-premises?
Yes. Refact offers on-premise deployment options for organizations requiring complete data control and privacy.
SourceCyberGhost VPN: What jurisdiction is it under?
The service is operated from Romania, which has no mandatory communications data retention law in force and is not a member of the Five, Nine or Fourteen Eyes intelligence-sharing arrangements. Ownership sits with Kape, headquartered in the UK.
Refact: What LLMs does Refact support?
Refact works with multiple LLMs including Claude, GPT-4, and open-source models, giving you flexibility in model selection.
SourceCyberGhost VPN: Does it work with streaming services?
Often, using the servers labelled for each service, but this changes constantly as platforms block address ranges. Treat streaming access as a feature that may stop working on any given day rather than a guarantee.
CyberGhost VPN: Can I use it on Linux or a router?
There is a command-line Linux client with fewer features than the desktop apps, and router use requires manual OpenVPN configuration rather than an official app.
Related pages
More on CyberGhost VPN
Other head to heads
- CyberGhost VPN vs Surfshark
- CyberGhost VPN vs Norton 360
- CyberGhost VPN vs 1Password
- CyberGhost VPN vs Bitdefender Total Security
- CyberGhost VPN vs LastPass
- CyberGhost VPN vs NordVPN
- CyberGhost VPN vs Private Internet Access
- CyberGhost VPN vs TunnelBear
- CyberGhost VPN vs Mullvad VPN
- CyberGhost VPN vs Windscribe
- CyberGhost VPN vs Avast One
- CyberGhost VPN vs IVPN
- CyberGhost VPN vs Sigstore
- CyberGhost VPN vs Speakeasy
- CyberGhost VPN vs Sysdig
- CyberGhost VPN vs Tenable
- CyberGhost VPN vs Trend Micro Vision One
- CyberGhost VPN vs GitHub Copilot
- CyberGhost VPN vs Swagger UI
- CyberGhost VPN vs Sweep
- CyberGhost VPN vs Coder
- CyberGhost VPN vs Deep Code
- CyberGhost VPN vs Pieces for Developers
- CyberGhost VPN vs CodeSandbox
- CyberGhost VPN vs GNU Emacs
- CyberGhost VPN vs Moonrepo
- CyberGhost VPN vs Pants Build
- CyberGhost VPN vs Atlantis
- CyberGhost VPN vs Backstage
- CyberGhost VPN vs JetBrains Rider
- CyberGhost VPN vs Spacelift
- CyberGhost VPN vs Argo CD
- CyberGhost VPN vs Blacksmith
- Refact vs Surfshark
- Refact vs Norton 360
- Refact vs 1Password
- Refact vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Refact vs LastPass
- Refact vs NordVPN
- Refact vs Private Internet Access
- Refact vs TunnelBear
- Refact vs Mullvad VPN
- Refact vs Windscribe
- Refact vs Avast One
- Refact vs IVPN
- Refact vs Sigstore
- Refact vs Speakeasy
- Refact vs Sysdig
- Refact vs Tenable
- Refact vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Refact vs GitHub Copilot
- Refact vs Swagger UI
- Refact vs Sweep
- Refact vs Coder
- Refact vs Deep Code
- Refact vs Pieces for Developers
- Refact vs CodeSandbox
- Refact vs GNU Emacs
- Refact vs Moonrepo
- Refact vs Pants Build
- Refact vs Atlantis
- Refact vs Backstage
- Refact vs JetBrains Rider
- Refact vs Spacelift
- Refact vs Argo CD
- Refact vs Blacksmith
