Cybersecurity · head to head
CyberGhost VPN vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
CyberGhost VPN
Cybersecurity
Consumer VPN operated from Romania and owned by Kape Technologies, with a no-logs claim audited by Deloitte.
- From
- $2.19/month
- Rated
- -

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Cybersecurity
Enterprise endpoint security built into Microsoft 365
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CyberGhost VPN kape Technologies, the parent, was formerly Crossrider, a browser extension platform whose technology was widely used to distribute adware, and Kape now also owns VPN review sites, so third-party rankings a buyer might use to verify the product can come from the same corporate group.; Microsoft Defender for Endpoint pricing not published on public websites; quote required from Microsoft sales
- They diverge on capability: CyberGhost VPN covers NoSpy servers, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint covers Threat & vulnerability management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CyberGhost VPN and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint actually diverge.
| Attribute | CyberGhost VPN | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $2.19/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Desktop, Mobile | Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android |
| Founded | 2011 | 1975 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CyberGhost VPN
- NoSpy servers
- Audited no-logs policy
- WireGuard, OpenVPN and IKEv2
- Streaming-labelled servers
- Dedicated IP via token
- Kill switch
- Split tunnelling
- Smart Rules
Only in Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Threat & vulnerability management
- Attack surface reduction
- Next-gen protection
- EDR
- Auto investigation
- Microsoft Threat Experts
- Threat analytics
- Secure score
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CyberGhost VPN
- A household that wants one subscription covering several devices for streaming and public Wi-Finot Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- A buyer who specifically wants a provider outside the Fourteen Eyes with a published third-party no-logs auditnot Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Torrenting on a connection where the internet provider throttles or logs peer-to-peer trafficnot Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Travellers needing to reach home-country services from abroad without configuring anything technicalnot Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Enterprise endpoint security across Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS via Plans 1 or 2not CyberGhost VPN
- Small and medium-sized businesses using Microsoft Defender for Business as alternativenot CyberGhost VPN
- Organisations using Microsoft 365 E5 which includes Defender for Endpoint Plan 2not CyberGhost VPN
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CyberGhost VPN
- Kape Technologies, the parent, was formerly Crossrider, a browser extension platform whose technology was widely used to distribute adware, and Kape now also owns VPN review sites, so third-party rankings a buyer might use to verify the product can come from the same corporate group.
- Pricing is structured so that the deep discount applies to the longest initial term and the standard rate applies at renewal, which means the figure used to make the decision is not the figure paid in year three unless the subscriber renegotiates or churns.
- The Deloitte engagement is point-in-time assurance over stated policy and server configuration, so it confirms things were as described when examined and says nothing about how the infrastructure behaves today or after an ownership change.
- Client capability differs sharply by platform: the Linux client is command-line only and lacks the kill switch and split tunnelling that the Windows client has, so a mixed-device household does not get the protection that reviews of the Windows app describe.
- Streaming-optimised server labels go stale because platforms block address ranges continually, and the practical support answer is to try a different server, which makes the labelled-server feature less dependable than the marketing implies.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Pricing not published on public websites; quote required from Microsoft sales
- Defender for Endpoint Plan 1 and Plan 2 do not include server licenses; additional licensing required for server protection
- Specific feature differences between Plan 1 and Plan 2 require consulting Microsoft documentation
Pricing, plan by plan
CyberGhost VPN
$2.19/month- 1 Month$12.99/month
- 7 devices
- 9000+ servers
- Unlimited bandwidth
- 2 Years + 2 Months$2.19/month
- All features
- Best value
- 45-day guarantee
- 6 Months$6.99/month
- All features
- 45-day guarantee
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Microsoft Defender for Endpoint review.
Which should you pick?
Choose CyberGhost VPN if
- You need nospy servers.
- You work on Web, Desktop, Mobile.
- You also want audited no-logs policy.
Choose Microsoft Defender for Endpoint if
- You need threat & vulnerability management.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
- You also want attack surface reduction.
Questions people ask
- Is CyberGhost VPN or Microsoft Defender for Endpoint better?
- Neither clearly leads. CyberGhost VPN starts at $2.19/month and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CyberGhost VPN or Microsoft Defender for Endpoint?
- CyberGhost VPN starts at $2.19/month and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint at On request.
- Does CyberGhost VPN or Microsoft Defender for Endpoint run on more platforms?
- CyberGhost VPN runs on Web, Desktop, Mobile. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
- What is CyberGhost VPN best used for?
- CyberGhost VPN is most often used for a household that wants one subscription covering several devices for streaming and public wi-fi, a buyer who specifically wants a provider outside the fourteen eyes with a published third-party no-logs audit, torrenting on a connection where the internet provider throttles or logs peer-to-peer traffic, travellers needing to reach home-country services from abroad without configuring anything technical. Of those, a household that wants one subscription covering several devices for streaming and public wi-fi and a buyer who specifically wants a provider outside the fourteen eyes with a published third-party no-logs audit are not what Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is typically brought in for.
- What can CyberGhost VPN do that Microsoft Defender for Endpoint cannot?
- CyberGhost VPN covers NoSpy servers, Audited no-logs policy, WireGuard, OpenVPN and IKEv2, Streaming-labelled servers. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint covers Threat & vulnerability management, Attack surface reduction, Next-gen protection, EDR.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CyberGhost VPN: Who owns CyberGhost?
Kape Technologies, which acquired it in 2017. Kape was formerly called Crossrider and also owns ExpressVPN, Private Internet Access and Zenmate, plus the review sites vpnMentor and Wizcase.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: How is Microsoft Defender for Endpoint priced?
Defender for Endpoint is bundled into Microsoft 365 enterprise subscriptions. Plan 1 is included in Microsoft 365 E3, and Plan 2 is included in Microsoft 365 E5. Individual pricing is not published separately.
SourceCyberGhost VPN: Has the no-logs claim been independently audited?
Yes. Deloitte has examined the no-logs policy and server configuration and published an assurance report. Note that this is a point-in-time engagement, not continuous monitoring.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: Does Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offer a trial?
Yes. A free trial is available for prospective customers to test the product before committing to a subscription.
SourceCyberGhost VPN: What jurisdiction is it under?
The service is operated from Romania, which has no mandatory communications data retention law in force and is not a member of the Five, Nine or Fourteen Eyes intelligence-sharing arrangements. Ownership sits with Kape, headquartered in the UK.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: What is the difference between Plan 1 and Plan 2?
Plan 1 (in E3) includes unified security tools, device controls, network protection, firewall, web/URL controls, APIs, SIEM connectors, and app controls. Plan 2 (in E5) adds endpoint detection and response, deception techniques, automatic attack disruption, exposure management, and threat intelligence.
SourceCyberGhost VPN: Does it work with streaming services?
Often, using the servers labelled for each service, but this changes constantly as platforms block address ranges. Treat streaming access as a feature that may stop working on any given day rather than a guarantee.
CyberGhost VPN: Can I use it on Linux or a router?
There is a command-line Linux client with fewer features than the desktop apps, and router use requires manual OpenVPN configuration rather than an official app.
Related pages
More on CyberGhost VPN
More on Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Other head to heads
- CyberGhost VPN vs Surfshark
- CyberGhost VPN vs Norton 360
- CyberGhost VPN vs 1Password
- CyberGhost VPN vs Bitdefender Total Security
- CyberGhost VPN vs LastPass
- CyberGhost VPN vs NordVPN
- CyberGhost VPN vs Private Internet Access
- CyberGhost VPN vs TunnelBear
- CyberGhost VPN vs Mullvad VPN
- CyberGhost VPN vs Windscribe
- CyberGhost VPN vs Avast One
- CyberGhost VPN vs IVPN
- CyberGhost VPN vs Sigstore
- CyberGhost VPN vs Speakeasy
- CyberGhost VPN vs Sysdig
- CyberGhost VPN vs Tenable
- CyberGhost VPN vs Trend Micro Vision One
- CyberGhost VPN vs SentinelOne Singularity
- CyberGhost VPN vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- CyberGhost VPN vs VMware Carbon Black
- CyberGhost VPN vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- CyberGhost VPN vs Sophos Intercept X
- CyberGhost VPN vs Darktrace
- CyberGhost VPN vs Akeyless
- CyberGhost VPN vs DataGrail
- CyberGhost VPN vs Delinea
- CyberGhost VPN vs Doppler
- CyberGhost VPN vs Envysion
- CyberGhost VPN vs Feedzai
- CyberGhost VPN vs SentinelOne
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Surfshark
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Norton 360
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs 1Password
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs LastPass
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs NordVPN
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Private Internet Access
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs TunnelBear
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Mullvad VPN
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Windscribe
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Avast One
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs IVPN
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Sigstore
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Speakeasy
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Sysdig
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Tenable
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs VMware Carbon Black
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Sophos Intercept X
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Darktrace
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Akeyless
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs DataGrail
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Delinea
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Doppler
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Envysion
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Feedzai
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs SentinelOne
