AI · head to head
CoreWeave vs Milvus

Milvus
Machine Learning
Open-source vector database for scalable similarity search
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Milvus has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: CoreWeave gPU nodes are sold as full 8 GPU instances rather than single cards, so the entry cost for an H100 node is $49.24 an hour on demand; Milvus vector dimensions are capped at 32,768
- They diverge on capability: CoreWeave covers NVIDIA H100/A100, Milvus covers Billion-scale vectors.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CoreWeave and Milvus actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), founded (2017).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CoreWeave
- NVIDIA H100/A100
- Kubernetes native
- High bandwidth
- Object storage
- Kubernetes
- Terraform
- Cloud APIs
- Cloud support
Only in Milvus
- Billion-scale vectors
- Multiple index types
- GPU acceleration
- Hybrid search
- Data partitioning
- PyTorch
- TensorFlow
- Hugging Face
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CoreWeave
- Renting GPU compute for model training and inferencenot Milvus
- Running large scale AI workloads without buying hardwarenot Milvus
Milvus
- Self hosting a vector database for semantic searchnot CoreWeave
- Storing and querying embeddings for retrieval augmented generationnot CoreWeave
- Similarity search over images, audio or text at scalenot CoreWeave
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CoreWeave
- GPU nodes are sold as full 8 GPU instances rather than single cards, so the entry cost for an H100 node is $49.24 an hour on demand
- Spot pricing is roughly 40% of on demand, at $19.71 an hour for the same H100 node, so predictable capacity carries a large premium
- The newest hardware carries no published price and requires contacting sales
- Discounts of up to 60% require committed usage agreements negotiated with sales
- Only the GH200 is offered as a single GPU instance
Milvus
- Vector dimensions are capped at 32,768
- A collection is limited to 64 fields, 1,024 partitions and 16 shards
- Only 1 index is allowed per field
- Search returns at most 16,384 vectors as top-k, and nq is capped at 16,384
- Input and output per RPC is capped at 64 MB for insert, search and query
- VARCHAR values are limited to 65,535 characters
- Data loaded into query nodes cannot exceed 90% of available memory
- An instance supports at most 65,536 collections
Pricing, plan by plan
CoreWeave
$0.35/per-hour- Standard$0.35/per-hour
- Various GPU types
- Kubernetes
- EnterpriseFree
- Dedicated clusters
- Custom solutions
Milvus
Free- Open SourceFree
- Full features
- Self-hosted
- Community support
- Zilliz CloudFree
- Managed service
- Free tier available
Which should you pick?
Choose CoreWeave if
- You need nvidia h100/a100.
- You work on Cloud.
- You also want kubernetes native.
Choose Milvus if
- You need billion-scale vectors.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Mac, Windows, Web.
- You also want multiple index types.
Questions people ask
- Is CoreWeave or Milvus better?
- Neither clearly leads. CoreWeave starts at $0.35/per-hour and Milvus at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CoreWeave or Milvus?
- Milvus has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $0.35/per-hour for CoreWeave and Free for Milvus.
- Does CoreWeave or Milvus run on more platforms?
- CoreWeave runs on Cloud. Milvus runs on Linux, Mac, Windows, Web.
- Can I use Milvus for free?
- Yes. Milvus has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. CoreWeave starts at $0.35/per-hour.
- What is CoreWeave best used for?
- CoreWeave is most often used for renting gpu compute for model training and inference, running large scale ai workloads without buying hardware. Of those, renting gpu compute for model training and inference and running large scale ai workloads without buying hardware are not what Milvus is typically brought in for.
- What can CoreWeave do that Milvus cannot?
- CoreWeave covers NVIDIA H100/A100, Kubernetes native, High bandwidth, Object storage. Milvus covers Billion-scale vectors, Multiple index types, GPU acceleration, Hybrid search.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CoreWeave: How much does CoreWeave cost?
CoreWeave does not publish pricing on its website. The company uses a quote-based pricing model and directs customers to contact their sales team directly to discuss pricing options and customized solutions.
SourceMilvus: How much does Milvus cost?
Milvus is open-source and free to use and modify. The self-hosted version has no licensing cost. Zilliz Cloud (the managed SaaS version) does not publish pricing on the website.
SourceCoreWeave: How can I get a quote from CoreWeave?
To obtain CoreWeave pricing, you must contact their sales team directly through the Contact Us option on their website. They will provide a customized quote based on your specific compute and infrastructure requirements.
SourceMilvus: Is there a free or open-source version of Milvus?
Yes, Milvus is fully open-source and available for free. Milvus Lite is a lightweight option for learning and prototyping that can be installed via pip.
SourceMilvus: Does Milvus offer a managed cloud service?
Yes, Zilliz Cloud is a fully managed Milvus cloud offering with serverless and dedicated cluster options. Pricing must be requested from the company as it is not listed on the public website.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- CoreWeave vs Anthropic API
- CoreWeave vs Fathom
- CoreWeave vs Pika
- CoreWeave vs D-ID
- CoreWeave vs Lambda Labs
- CoreWeave vs Modal
- CoreWeave vs RunPod
- CoreWeave vs Banana
- CoreWeave vs Replicate
- CoreWeave vs AI21 Labs
- CoreWeave vs Sourcegraph Cody
- CoreWeave vs Tabnine
- CoreWeave vs Leonardo AI
- CoreWeave vs Murf
- CoreWeave vs Pi
- CoreWeave vs Play.ht
- CoreWeave vs Replika
- CoreWeave vs Google Vertex AI
- CoreWeave vs AWS SageMaker
- CoreWeave vs Azure Machine Learning
- CoreWeave vs DataRobot
- CoreWeave vs Pinecone
- CoreWeave vs Weaviate
- CoreWeave vs Ray
- CoreWeave vs Fal AI
- CoreWeave vs Jupyter
- CoreWeave vs Keras
- CoreWeave vs LangChain
- CoreWeave vs Weights & Biases
- CoreWeave vs Alteryx
- CoreWeave vs Anaconda
- CoreWeave vs Domino Data Lab
- CoreWeave vs DVC
- CoreWeave vs Semantic Kernel
- Milvus vs Anthropic API
- Milvus vs Fathom
- Milvus vs Pika
- Milvus vs D-ID
- Milvus vs Lambda Labs
- Milvus vs Modal
- Milvus vs RunPod
- Milvus vs Banana
- Milvus vs Replicate
- Milvus vs AI21 Labs
- Milvus vs Sourcegraph Cody
- Milvus vs Tabnine
- Milvus vs Leonardo AI
- Milvus vs Murf
- Milvus vs Pi
- Milvus vs Play.ht
- Milvus vs Replika
- Milvus vs Google Vertex AI
- Milvus vs AWS SageMaker
- Milvus vs Azure Machine Learning
- Milvus vs DataRobot
- Milvus vs Pinecone
- Milvus vs Weaviate
- Milvus vs Ray
- Milvus vs Fal AI
- Milvus vs Jupyter
- Milvus vs Keras
- Milvus vs LangChain
- Milvus vs Weights & Biases
- Milvus vs Alteryx
- Milvus vs Anaconda
- Milvus vs Domino Data Lab
- Milvus vs DVC
- Milvus vs Semantic Kernel

