Machine Learning · head to head
Comet ML vs Sourcegraph Cody

Comet ML
Machine Learning
Platform for tracking, comparing, and optimizing ML experiments
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Sourcegraph Cody
AI
Enterprise AI coding assistant with whole-codebase context
- From
- $59/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Comet ML has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Comet ML the free cloud tier caps data at 25,000 spans a month with 60 day retention; Sourcegraph Cody no longer available to individual developers or small teams after free and Pro tiers were discontinued in mid-2025
- They diverge on capability: Comet ML covers Experiment tracking, Sourcegraph Cody covers Multi-repository context.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Comet ML and Sourcegraph Cody actually diverge.
| Attribute | Comet ML | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $59/month |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, Mac, Windows | web, windows, mac, linux |
| Category | Machine Learning | AI |
| Founded | 2017 | 2013 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Comet ML
- Experiment tracking
- Code versioning
- Model registry
- Hyperparameter optimization
- Production monitoring
- PyTorch
- TensorFlow
- Keras
Only in Sourcegraph Cody
- Multi-repository context
- Large context window
- Context filters
- Model flexibility
- IDE integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Comet ML
- LLM observability and monitoringnot Sourcegraph Cody
- AI agent testing and debuggingnot Sourcegraph Cody
- Experiment tracking for machine learningnot Sourcegraph Cody
- Model registry and version managementnot Sourcegraph Cody
- ML model training monitoringnot Sourcegraph Cody
Sourcegraph Cody
- Cross-repository code understanding for large engineering orgsnot Comet ML
- AI-assisted code review and refactoring at enterprise scalenot Comet ML
- Enforcing data-boundary controls when using third-party LLMsnot Comet ML
- Codebase-aware chat and autocomplete for developersnot Comet ML
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Comet ML
- The free cloud tier caps data at 25,000 spans a month with 60 day retention
- Retention stays at 60 days even on the paid Pro plan, and extending it is a $29 per 100k spans add on
- Overage on Pro is $5 per additional 100,000 spans
- The free MLOps tier is a single user with 100 GB of storage and training hours governed by a fair usage policy
- Pro MLOps is $19 per user per month and caps the team at 10 users
Sourcegraph Cody
- No longer available to individual developers or small teams after free and Pro tiers were discontinued in mid-2025
- Priced substantially higher than many competing AI coding assistants, with Enterprise plans typically requiring annual contracts
- Sourcegraph has shifted its individual-developer focus to a separate product, Amp, creating uncertainty about Cody's long-term product priority
- Requires integration with Sourcegraph's broader code intelligence platform rather than working as a lightweight standalone extension
Pricing, plan by plan
Comet ML
Free- Free CloudFree
- Up to 10 team members
- 25,000 spans per month
- 60-day data retention
- Pro Cloud$19/month
- Up to 50 team members
- 100,000 spans per month
- 60-day data retention
- MLOps FreeFree
- 1 user with fair usage policy
- Experiment tracking
- Dataset management
- MLOps Pro$19/user/month
- Up to 10 users
- 1,500 training hours included
- 500GB storage included
Sourcegraph Cody
$59/month- Enterprise$59/month
- Whole-codebase AI context
- Context filters for sensitive code
- Multi-repository analysis
Which should you pick?
Choose Comet ML if
- You need experiment tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Mac, Windows.
- You also want code versioning.
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if
- You need multi-repository context.
- You work on web, windows, mac, linux.
- You also want large context window.
Questions people ask
- Is Comet ML or Sourcegraph Cody better?
- Neither clearly leads. Comet ML starts at Free and Sourcegraph Cody at $59/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Comet ML or Sourcegraph Cody?
- Comet ML has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Comet ML and $59/month for Sourcegraph Cody.
- Does Comet ML or Sourcegraph Cody run on more platforms?
- Comet ML runs on Web, Linux, Mac, Windows. Sourcegraph Cody runs on web, windows, mac, linux.
- Can I use Comet ML for free?
- Yes. Comet ML has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sourcegraph Cody starts at $59/month.
- What is Comet ML best used for?
- Comet ML is most often used for llm observability and monitoring, ai agent testing and debugging, experiment tracking for machine learning, model registry and version management. Of those, llm observability and monitoring and ai agent testing and debugging are not what Sourcegraph Cody is typically brought in for.
- What can Comet ML do that Sourcegraph Cody cannot?
- Comet ML covers Experiment tracking, Code versioning, Model registry, Hyperparameter optimization. Sourcegraph Cody covers Multi-repository context, Large context window, Context filters, Model flexibility.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Comet ML: Does Comet.ml offer a free plan?
Yes, Comet.ml offers free tiers for both Opik (cloud observability) and MLOps platforms. Free Cloud Opik includes up to 10 team members and 25,000 spans/month. Free MLOps tier is limited to 1 user.
SourceSourcegraph Cody: Is Sourcegraph Cody still available to individual developers?
No, as of mid-2025 Cody Free and Pro plans were discontinued; Cody is now sold only as part of Sourcegraph's Enterprise plan, which requires an annual contract.
SourceComet ML: How many team members can use the free Comet.ml tier?
Free Cloud supports up to 10 team members. The Pro Cloud plan supports up to 50 team members at $19/month.
SourceSourcegraph Cody: How much does Sourcegraph Enterprise cost?
Enterprise plans start around $16,000 and scale with team size and seat count, including bundled AI credits; exact pricing requires a sales quote.
SourceComet ML: What is a span in Comet.ml pricing?
A span represents a single tracked operation such as model requests or function calls. Free Cloud tier includes 25,000 spans per month.
SourceSourcegraph Cody: How does the AI credit system work on Enterprise plans?
Each plan includes a pooled allocation of AI credits shared across the organization; credits do not expire and roll over at renewal, with volume credit add-ons available.
SourceComet ML: Does Comet.ml offer academic pricing?
Yes, a free Pro plan is available for academic users; verification is required via signup.
SourceSourcegraph Cody: What happens if my organization exceeds its credit allocation?
Sourcegraph's pricing page addresses overage and offers additional volume credit buckets for teams that need more than their committed allocation.
SourceSourcegraph Cody: Is a free trial available for Sourcegraph Enterprise?
Sourcegraph's pricing page lists free trial availability as one of its published FAQ topics for prospective Enterprise customers.
SourceRelated pages
More on Sourcegraph Cody
Other head to heads
- Comet ML vs Weights & Biases
- Comet ML vs Neptune.ai
- Comet ML vs MLflow
- Comet ML vs AWS SageMaker
- Comet ML vs Azure Machine Learning
- Comet ML vs Google Vertex AI
- Comet ML vs DataRobot
- Comet ML vs ClearML
- Comet ML vs Dataiku
- Comet ML vs Domino Data Lab
- Comet ML vs DVC
- Comet ML vs Kubeflow
- Comet ML vs Fal AI
- Comet ML vs H2O.ai
- Comet ML vs Hugging Face
- Comet ML vs Tabnine
- Comet ML vs Amazon Q Developer
- Comet ML vs PromptLayer
- Comet ML vs AI21 Labs
- Comet ML vs Aider
- Comet ML vs Arize AI
- Comet ML vs Gumloop
- Comet ML vs Helicone
- Comet ML vs CoreWeave
- Comet ML vs Poolside
- Comet ML vs Cartesia
- Comet ML vs Jasper
- Comet ML vs ElevenLabs
- Comet ML vs Grok
- Comet ML vs Inflection AI
- Comet ML vs LatchBio
- Comet ML vs LOVO
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Weights & Biases
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Neptune.ai
- Sourcegraph Cody vs MLflow
- Sourcegraph Cody vs AWS SageMaker
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Azure Machine Learning
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Google Vertex AI
- Sourcegraph Cody vs DataRobot
- Sourcegraph Cody vs ClearML
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Dataiku
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Domino Data Lab
- Sourcegraph Cody vs DVC
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Kubeflow
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Fal AI
- Sourcegraph Cody vs H2O.ai
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Hugging Face
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Tabnine
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Amazon Q Developer
- Sourcegraph Cody vs PromptLayer
- Sourcegraph Cody vs AI21 Labs
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Aider
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Arize AI
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Gumloop
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Helicone
- Sourcegraph Cody vs CoreWeave
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Poolside
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Cartesia
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Jasper
- Sourcegraph Cody vs ElevenLabs
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Grok
- Sourcegraph Cody vs Inflection AI
- Sourcegraph Cody vs LatchBio
- Sourcegraph Cody vs LOVO
