Softwr

Energy · head to head

Azelio Energy Storage vs Cognite Data Fusion

A

Azelio Energy Storage

Energy

Thermal energy storage system design and optimization

From
On request
Rated
-
Cognite Data Fusion logo

Cognite Data Fusion

Energy

Industrial data platform that contextualises OT, IT and engineering data into an asset-centric knowledge graph

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • They diverge on capability: Azelio Energy Storage covers System design, Cognite Data Fusion covers Asset-centric data model.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Azelio Energy Storage and Cognite Data Fusion actually diverge.

Attributes where Azelio Energy Storage and Cognite Data Fusion differ
AttributeAzelio Energy StorageCognite Data Fusion
PlatformsDesktopWeb, Cloud
Founded2012Unknown

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Energy).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Azelio Energy Storage

  • System design
  • Thermal simulation
  • Performance optimization
  • Integration planning
  • Technical documentation
  • On-premise deployment
  • Desktop support
  • English language support

Only in Cognite Data Fusion

  • Asset-centric data model
  • Entity matching
  • P&ID parsing
  • 3D contextualisation
  • Cognite Atlas AI
  • Data workflows
  • Open SDKs
  • Extractors

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Azelio Energy Storage

  • System designnot Cognite Data Fusion
  • Feasibility analysisnot Cognite Data Fusion

Cognite Data Fusion

  • An operator that wants engineers to find the drawing, the sensor trend and the last work order for a valve from one searchnot Azelio Energy Storage
  • A company standardising asset data across sites so an analytics team can build once and deploy to many plantsnot Azelio Energy Storage
  • An upstream operator building a production-optimisation model that needs sensor data joined to equipment metadatanot Azelio Energy Storage
  • A team replacing a stalled internal data-lake project where nobody could reconstruct what the tag names meantnot Azelio Energy Storage

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Azelio Energy Storage

Nothing recorded yet. See the Azelio Energy Storage review.

Cognite Data Fusion

  • The platform is only as good as the contextualisation work, and that mapping effort is a consulting project that regularly costs more than the first-year subscription.
  • Pricing is consumption-based and unpublished, so costs move with data volume and usage patterns you cannot forecast well until a year in.
  • It does not replace your historian, your ERP or your maintenance system, so Cognite is an additional recurring cost layered on systems you still pay for.
  • The reference base and data model lean heavily towards Norwegian and wider oil, gas and process industries; discrete manufacturing fit is weaker and the local partner network thinner outside energy.
  • Getting value out requires in-house Python and data engineering skill; organisations without a data team end up dependent on Cognite professional services for every new use case.

Pricing, plan by plan

Azelio Energy Storage

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Azelio Energy Storage review.

Cognite Data Fusion

On request
  • Cognite Data Fusion$undefined/year
    • Consumption-based pricing on data volume, compute and users
    • Available through cloud marketplaces with private offers
    • Contextualisation and onboarding quoted as a separate engagement

Which should you pick?

Choose Azelio Energy Storage if

  • You need system design.
  • You work on Desktop.
  • You also want thermal simulation.

Choose Cognite Data Fusion if

  • You need asset-centric data model.
  • You work on Web, Cloud.
  • You also want entity matching.

Questions people ask

Is Azelio Energy Storage or Cognite Data Fusion better?
Neither clearly leads. Azelio Energy Storage starts at On request and Cognite Data Fusion at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Azelio Energy Storage or Cognite Data Fusion?
Azelio Energy Storage starts at On request and Cognite Data Fusion at On request.
Does Azelio Energy Storage or Cognite Data Fusion run on more platforms?
Azelio Energy Storage runs on Desktop. Cognite Data Fusion runs on Web, Cloud.
What is Azelio Energy Storage best used for?
Azelio Energy Storage is most often used for system design, feasibility analysis. Of those, system design and feasibility analysis are not what Cognite Data Fusion is typically brought in for.
What can Azelio Energy Storage do that Cognite Data Fusion cannot?
Azelio Energy Storage covers System design, Thermal simulation, Performance optimization, Integration planning. Cognite Data Fusion covers Asset-centric data model, Entity matching, P&ID parsing, 3D contextualisation.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Cognite Data Fusion: Is Cognite a historian?

No. It reads from historians such as PI System and adds context. You still need the historian underneath.

Cognite Data Fusion: How is it priced?

Consumption-based on data, compute and users, quoted per customer. Nothing is published.

Cognite Data Fusion: How long does a deployment take?

First useful graph in a few months is realistic; full plant contextualisation across a site is typically a year or more.

Cognite Data Fusion: Can we do the contextualisation ourselves?

Technically yes, the SDKs and matching tools are open, but most customers use Cognite or a partner for the first site.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads