Software · head to head
Climate FieldView vs Ventusky

Climate FieldView
Software
Digital agriculture platform for data-driven farming
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Climate FieldView the Plus plan starts at $649 per year and is billed annually; Ventusky the Premium subscription page names two tiers, Premium and Premium plus, capped at 4 and 25 devices respectively, but publishes no price for either, showing a dash where the figure would appear
- They diverge on capability: Climate FieldView covers Real-time data collection, Ventusky covers Animated weather maps.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Climate FieldView and Ventusky actually diverge.
| Attribute | Climate FieldView | Ventusky |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | free |
| Platforms | Web, Ios, Android, Api | Web, Ios, Android |
| Founded | 2006 | 2015 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Climate FieldView
- Real-time data collection
- Field health imagery
- Yield analysis
- Variable rate seeding
- Nitrogen management
- Equipment connectivity
- Manual scouting tools
- Data sharing & connectivity
Only in Ventusky
- Animated weather maps
- Multiple forecast models
- Wind visualization
- Temperature maps
- Precipitation forecasts
- Web embedding
- Android support
Both cover
- Web support
- Ios support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Climate FieldView
- Collecting and visualising planting, yield and application data from farm machinerynot Ventusky
- Building variable rate seeding prescriptionsnot Ventusky
- Field scouting with satellite imagery and field health mapsnot Ventusky
Ventusky
- Interactive weather forecast, radar and wind mapping, with a paid Premium tier for unlimited layers and forecasts beyond 7 daysnot Climate FieldView
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Climate FieldView
- The Plus plan starts at $649 per year and is billed annually
- The free Basic plan lists only Online Support and a Data Inbox as its included features
- Collecting in-cab data requires buying the FieldView Drive hardware separately
- The vendor states the plan content is subject to change and will be updated regularly
Ventusky
- The Premium subscription page names two tiers, Premium and Premium plus, capped at 4 and 25 devices respectively, but publishes no price for either, showing a dash where the figure would appear
Pricing, plan by plan
Climate FieldView
Free- FieldView DriveFree
- Data collection & storage
- Basic field mapping
- Equipment connectivity
- FieldView Plus$4/acre/year
- Everything in Drive
- Field health imagery
- Scouting with drop pins
- FieldView Pro$10/acre/year
- Everything in Plus
- Seed scripting
- Nitrogen advisor
Ventusky
Free- FreeFree
- Weather maps
- Multiple models
- Forecasts
Which should you pick?
Choose Climate FieldView if
- You need real-time data collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- You also want field health imagery.
Choose Ventusky if
- You need animated weather maps.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want multiple forecast models.
Questions people ask
- Is Climate FieldView or Ventusky better?
- Neither clearly leads. Climate FieldView starts at Free and Ventusky at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Climate FieldView or Ventusky?
- Climate FieldView starts at Free and Ventusky at Free.
- Does Climate FieldView or Ventusky run on more platforms?
- Climate FieldView runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. Ventusky runs on Web, Ios, Android.
- Can I use Climate FieldView for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Climate FieldView best used for?
- Climate FieldView is most often used for collecting and visualising planting, yield and application data from farm machinery, building variable rate seeding prescriptions, field scouting with satellite imagery and field health maps. Of those, collecting and visualising planting, yield and application data from farm machinery and building variable rate seeding prescriptions are not what Ventusky is typically brought in for.
- What can Climate FieldView do that Ventusky cannot?
- Climate FieldView covers Real-time data collection, Field health imagery, Yield analysis, Variable rate seeding. Ventusky covers Animated weather maps, Multiple forecast models, Wind visualization, Temperature maps. Both handle Web support, Ios support.
Related pages
More on Climate FieldView
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Climate FieldView vs AccuWeather
- Climate FieldView vs MyRadar
- Climate FieldView vs The Weather Channel
- Climate FieldView vs WeatherBug
- Climate FieldView vs RadarScope
- Climate FieldView vs Apple Weather (Dark Sky)
- Climate FieldView vs Baron Weather
- Climate FieldView vs Carrot Weather
- Climate FieldView vs DTN Weather
- Climate FieldView vs Foreca
- Climate FieldView vs MeteoGroup
- Climate FieldView vs OpenWeatherMap
- Climate FieldView vs Aeris Weather
- Climate FieldView vs Airveda
- Climate FieldView vs Ambient Weather Network
- Climate FieldView vs Awair
- Climate FieldView vs BreezoMeter
- Climate FieldView vs IQAir
- Ventusky vs AccuWeather
- Ventusky vs MyRadar
- Ventusky vs The Weather Channel
- Ventusky vs WeatherBug
- Ventusky vs RadarScope
- Ventusky vs Apple Weather (Dark Sky)
- Ventusky vs Baron Weather
- Ventusky vs Carrot Weather
- Ventusky vs DTN Weather
- Ventusky vs Foreca
- Ventusky vs MeteoGroup
- Ventusky vs OpenWeatherMap
- Ventusky vs Aeris Weather
- Ventusky vs Airveda
- Ventusky vs Ambient Weather Network
- Ventusky vs Awair
- Ventusky vs BreezoMeter
- Ventusky vs IQAir

