Weather · head to head
Climate FieldView vs Teralytic

Climate FieldView
Weather
Digital agriculture platform for data-driven farming
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Teralytic
Agriculture
Wireless soil probe reading NPK at three depths, sold as an annual per-probe service rather than a sensor
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Climate FieldView has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Climate FieldView the Plus plan starts at $649 per year and is billed annually; Teralytic the company is reported at around six employees, so if it stops trading the buried probes become inert hardware, which is the single biggest risk in a multi-year soil sensing deployment.
- They diverge on capability: Climate FieldView covers Real-time data collection, Teralytic covers Wireless NPK sensing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Climate FieldView and Teralytic actually diverge.
| Attribute | Climate FieldView | Teralytic |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Ios, Android, Api | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Weather | Agriculture |
| Founded | 2006 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Climate FieldView
- Real-time data collection
- Field health imagery
- Yield analysis
- Variable rate seeding
- Nitrogen management
- Equipment connectivity
- Manual scouting tools
- Data sharing & connectivity
Only in Teralytic
- Wireless NPK sensing
- Three-depth profile
- Soil respiration and aeration
- Long-range radio uplink
- Cloud analytics
- Above-ground sensing
- API access
- Multi-field deployment view
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Climate FieldView
- Collecting and visualising planting, yield and application data from farm machinerynot Teralytic
- Building variable rate seeding prescriptionsnot Teralytic
- Field scouting with satellite imagery and field health mapsnot Teralytic
Teralytic
- A research trial that needs continuous nitrogen readings between sampling dates rather than two lab tests a seasonnot Climate FieldView
- A vegetable grower on sandy ground where leaching after rain makes a fortnightly lab test worthlessnot Climate FieldView
- An almond or vine operation tracking salinity build-up under drip irrigationnot Climate FieldView
- An agronomist validating a variable-rate nitrogen prescription against in-ground readingsnot Climate FieldView
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Climate FieldView
- The Plus plan starts at $649 per year and is billed annually
- The free Basic plan lists only Online Support and a Data Inbox as its included features
- Collecting in-cab data requires buying the FieldView Drive hardware separately
- The vendor states the plan content is subject to change and will be updated regularly
Teralytic
- The company is reported at around six employees, so if it stops trading the buried probes become inert hardware, which is the single biggest risk in a multi-year soil sensing deployment.
- No current pricing is published and reported figures have moved between roughly 300 and 500 US dollars per probe per year, so a buyer cannot model the cost of a hundred-probe deployment without a quote.
- The subscription is mandatory for the probe to report at all, so the up-front hardware payment buys nothing durable and a lapsed account means a field full of dead instruments.
- In-field NPK sensing is scientifically contested and readings need interpretation against soil type and calibration, so agronomists will not treat the numbers as interchangeable with a lab test and many will insist on both.
- Spatial coverage is the unsolved problem: a probe measures one point, soil varies over metres, and covering a field properly multiplies both the hardware and the annual subscription by the number of zones you care about.
Pricing, plan by plan
Climate FieldView
Free- FieldView DriveFree
- Data collection & storage
- Basic field mapping
- Equipment connectivity
- FieldView Plus$4/acre/year
- Everything in Drive
- Field health imagery
- Scouting with drop pins
- FieldView Pro$10/acre/year
- Everything in Plus
- Seed scripting
- Nitrogen advisor
Teralytic
On request- Teralytic Soil Probe$undefined/year
- Probe purchased or supplied with an annual per-probe subscription
- Subscription covers hardware, network, software and analytics
- Reported figures have ranged from roughly 300 to 500 USD per probe per year
Which should you pick?
Choose Climate FieldView if
- You need real-time data collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- You also want field health imagery.
Choose Teralytic if
- You need wireless npk sensing.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want three-depth profile.
Questions people ask
- Is Climate FieldView or Teralytic better?
- Neither clearly leads. Climate FieldView starts at Free and Teralytic at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Climate FieldView or Teralytic?
- Climate FieldView has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Climate FieldView and On request for Teralytic.
- Does Climate FieldView or Teralytic run on more platforms?
- Climate FieldView runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. Teralytic runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Climate FieldView for free?
- Yes. Climate FieldView has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Teralytic starts at On request.
- What is Climate FieldView best used for?
- Climate FieldView is most often used for collecting and visualising planting, yield and application data from farm machinery, building variable rate seeding prescriptions, field scouting with satellite imagery and field health maps. Of those, collecting and visualising planting, yield and application data from farm machinery and building variable rate seeding prescriptions are not what Teralytic is typically brought in for.
- What can Climate FieldView do that Teralytic cannot?
- Climate FieldView covers Real-time data collection, Field health imagery, Yield analysis, Variable rate seeding. Teralytic covers Wireless NPK sensing, Three-depth profile, Soil respiration and aeration, Long-range radio uplink.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Climate FieldView: How much does Climate FieldView cost?
Climate FieldView does not publish pricing on its main website. The company directs customers to visit their pricing page or contact their support team for personalized plan details.
SourceTeralytic: Can I buy the probe without a subscription?
No. The probe reports through Teralytic’s network into its cloud, and without an active subscription it does not deliver data.
Climate FieldView: What kind of plans does Climate FieldView offer?
The website mentions 'Personalized Plans' but does not specify plan names, tiers, or pricing structures on the publicly accessible content.
SourceTeralytic: Does it replace lab soil tests?
No. It gives continuous in-season trend data. Most agronomists will still want lab results for absolute nutrient values and for compliance records.
Climate FieldView: Is there customer support included?
Yes, Climate FieldView mentions offering 'Full Support' with its plans, but specific support details and how they vary by plan are not disclosed.
SourceTeralytic: How much does it cost?
Teralytic does not publish current pricing. Reported figures have ranged from roughly 300 to 500 US dollars per probe per year including hardware and connectivity.
Climate FieldView: How do I get a pricing quote?
Click the 'Find a Plan' button on the Climate FieldView homepage, or contact their support team directly to discuss personalized pricing for your agricultural operation.
SourceTeralytic: How many probes does a field need?
That depends on soil variability. One probe represents one point, so a field with several distinct soil zones needs one per zone to be meaningful.
Related pages
More on Climate FieldView
Other head to heads
- Climate FieldView vs AccuWeather
- Climate FieldView vs MyRadar
- Climate FieldView vs The Weather Channel
- Climate FieldView vs WeatherBug
- Climate FieldView vs ClearAg
- Climate FieldView vs MeteoGroup
- Climate FieldView vs Ambient Weather Network
- Climate FieldView vs Foreca
- Climate FieldView vs Airveda
- Climate FieldView vs Tomorrow.io
- Climate FieldView vs Weathernews Inc
- Climate FieldView vs Gro Intelligence
- Climate FieldView vs Hello Weather
- Climate FieldView vs Meteomatics
- Climate FieldView vs Plume Labs
- Climate FieldView vs Today Weather
- Climate FieldView vs uHoo
- Climate FieldView vs DTN Weather
- Climate FieldView vs CropX
- Climate FieldView vs Arable
- Climate FieldView vs Davis Instruments WeatherLink
- Climate FieldView vs METER Group ZENTRA
- Climate FieldView vs Soil Scout
- Climate FieldView vs John Deere Operations Center
- Climate FieldView vs CeresAI
- Climate FieldView vs Lindsay FieldNET
- Climate FieldView vs Cropio
- Climate FieldView vs FarmLogs
- Climate FieldView vs Ag Leader
- Climate FieldView vs AgriWater
- Climate FieldView vs Reinke ReinCloud
- Climate FieldView vs Tend
- Climate FieldView vs Traction
- Climate FieldView vs xarvio Digital Farming
- Climate FieldView vs Allflex Livestock Intelligence
- Climate FieldView vs Connecterra
- Teralytic vs AccuWeather
- Teralytic vs MyRadar
- Teralytic vs The Weather Channel
- Teralytic vs WeatherBug
- Teralytic vs ClearAg
- Teralytic vs MeteoGroup
- Teralytic vs Ambient Weather Network
- Teralytic vs Foreca
- Teralytic vs Airveda
- Teralytic vs Tomorrow.io
- Teralytic vs Weathernews Inc
- Teralytic vs Gro Intelligence
- Teralytic vs Hello Weather
- Teralytic vs Meteomatics
- Teralytic vs Plume Labs
- Teralytic vs Today Weather
- Teralytic vs uHoo
- Teralytic vs DTN Weather
- Teralytic vs CropX
- Teralytic vs Arable
- Teralytic vs Davis Instruments WeatherLink
- Teralytic vs METER Group ZENTRA
- Teralytic vs Soil Scout
- Teralytic vs John Deere Operations Center
- Teralytic vs CeresAI
- Teralytic vs Lindsay FieldNET
- Teralytic vs Cropio
- Teralytic vs FarmLogs
- Teralytic vs Ag Leader
- Teralytic vs AgriWater
- Teralytic vs Reinke ReinCloud
- Teralytic vs Tend
- Teralytic vs Traction
- Teralytic vs xarvio Digital Farming
- Teralytic vs Allflex Livestock Intelligence
- Teralytic vs Connecterra
