Testing · head to head
CircleCI vs IAR Embedded Workbench

IAR Embedded Workbench
Developer Tools
Complete toolchain for embedded software development
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only CircleCI has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: CircleCI the free plan covers 6,000 build minutes and 5 active users a month; IAR Embedded Workbench no pricing information published on product page; prospective customers directed to free trial or sales contact only
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CircleCI and IAR Embedded Workbench actually diverge.
| Attribute | CircleCI | IAR Embedded Workbench |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Category | Testing | Developer Tools |
| Founded | 2011 | Unknown |
Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CircleCI
- Continuous integration pipelines for application codenot IAR Embedded Workbench
- Parallel test execution across containersnot IAR Embedded Workbench
- Docker-based builds with layer cachingnot IAR Embedded Workbench
- Deployment pipelines with approval gatesnot IAR Embedded Workbench
- Self-hosted runners for private infrastructurenot IAR Embedded Workbench
IAR Embedded Workbench
- Embedded software development and debuggingnot CircleCI
- Compiler and linker tools for embedded systemsnot CircleCI
- Multi-architecture embedded development supportnot CircleCI
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CircleCI
- The free plan covers 6,000 build minutes and 5 active users a month
- Active users are billed at $15 each beyond the included five, and an active user is anyone who commits to a project
- Everything runs on credits, so compute, Docker layer caching at 200 credits a job and IP ranges at 450 credits per GB all draw from the same pool
- Network and storage overage costs 420 credits per GB
- Free credits expire monthly with no rollover, and paid credits expire after a year
- Scale is annual billing only
IAR Embedded Workbench
- No pricing information published on product page; prospective customers directed to free trial or sales contact only
- Pricing model not specified; customers must request quote or try free trial to understand licensing costs
- Embedded development tools typically require expensive licenses, but specific IAR costs unavailable online
Pricing, plan by plan
CircleCI
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 6,000 build minutes (small Docker resource class)
- Up to 5 active users per month
- 30,000 free credits per month
- Performance$15/month
- 30,000 credits included monthly
- 5 active users included (additional users $15/month each)
- 80x concurrency
- Scale$null/year
- Custom number of credits
- Customizable user limits
- Unlimited concurrency
IAR Embedded Workbench
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the IAR Embedded Workbench review.
Which should you pick?
Choose IAR Embedded Workbench if
Nothing in the data separates IAR Embedded Workbench from CircleCI on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is CircleCI or IAR Embedded Workbench better?
- Neither clearly leads. CircleCI starts at Free and IAR Embedded Workbench at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CircleCI or IAR Embedded Workbench?
- CircleCI has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for CircleCI and On request for IAR Embedded Workbench.
- Does CircleCI or IAR Embedded Workbench run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use CircleCI for free?
- Yes. CircleCI has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. IAR Embedded Workbench starts at On request.
- What is CircleCI best used for?
- CircleCI is most often used for continuous integration pipelines for application code, parallel test execution across containers, docker-based builds with layer caching, deployment pipelines with approval gates. Of those, continuous integration pipelines for application code and parallel test execution across containers are not what IAR Embedded Workbench is typically brought in for.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CircleCI: How much does CircleCI Performance plan cost?
CircleCI Performance plan costs $15 USD per month and includes 30,000 credits, 5 active users, 80x concurrency, 5 GB network, and 2 GB storage. Additional users beyond 5 cost $15 each per month.
SourceIAR Embedded Workbench: How much does IAR Embedded Workbench cost?
IAR Embedded Workbench pricing is not published on the product page. Prospective customers are directed to free trials or must contact the sales team to request pricing.
SourceCircleCI: Can I purchase additional credits on CircleCI Performance plan?
Yes, additional credits are available at $15 for every 25,000 credits purchased. Paid credits roll over month to month and expire after one year; free plan credits expire monthly without rollover.
SourceIAR Embedded Workbench: Does IAR Embedded Workbench offer a free trial?
Free trials are available for IAR Embedded Workbench evaluation at https://www.iar.com/embedded-development-tools/free-trials, though specific trial length and limitations are not detailed on the product page.
SourceCircleCI: What is included in the CircleCI free plan?
The free plan includes up to 6,000 build minutes per month (small Docker resource class), 5 active users, 30,000 free credits monthly, 30x concurrency, 1 GB network, 2 GB storage, and community support. No credit card required.
SourceIAR Embedded Workbench: What is the pricing model for IAR Embedded Workbench?
The pricing model is not disclosed on the product page. Customers must contact the sales team to obtain quotes and understand licensing terms.
SourceCircleCI: What are the Scale plan limits and pricing?
CircleCI Scale plan offers custom pricing billed annually with unlimited concurrency, 50 GB network, 200 GB storage, customizable credits and users, enterprise controls, and GPU environment access. Requires contacting sales for a quote.
SourceRelated pages
More on IAR Embedded Workbench
Other head to heads
- CircleCI vs Insomnia
- CircleCI vs BrowserStack
- CircleCI vs BugHerd
- CircleCI vs Cypress
- CircleCI vs Playwright
- CircleCI vs GitHub Actions
- CircleCI vs Selenium
- CircleCI vs Puppeteer
- CircleCI vs Vitest
- CircleCI vs Zephyr Scale
- CircleCI vs Visual Studio Code
- CircleCI vs ESLint
- CircleCI vs pnpm
- CircleCI vs Turborepo
- CircleCI vs GitHub Copilot
- CircleCI vs Penpot
- CircleCI vs Keycloak
- CircleCI vs Rust
- CircleCI vs CLion
- CircleCI vs GNAT Pro
- CircleCI vs GNU Emacs
- CircleCI vs Keil MDK
- CircleCI vs Vite
- CircleCI vs Bazel
- CircleCI vs CodeSandbox
- CircleCI vs Eclipse IDE
- CircleCI vs Moonrepo
- CircleCI vs Nx Cloud
- IAR Embedded Workbench vs Insomnia
- IAR Embedded Workbench vs BrowserStack
- IAR Embedded Workbench vs BugHerd
- IAR Embedded Workbench vs Cypress
- IAR Embedded Workbench vs Playwright
- IAR Embedded Workbench vs GitHub Actions
- IAR Embedded Workbench vs Selenium
- IAR Embedded Workbench vs Puppeteer
- IAR Embedded Workbench vs Vitest
- IAR Embedded Workbench vs Zephyr Scale
- IAR Embedded Workbench vs Visual Studio Code
- IAR Embedded Workbench vs ESLint
- IAR Embedded Workbench vs pnpm
- IAR Embedded Workbench vs Turborepo
- IAR Embedded Workbench vs GitHub Copilot
- IAR Embedded Workbench vs Penpot
- IAR Embedded Workbench vs Keycloak
- IAR Embedded Workbench vs Rust
- IAR Embedded Workbench vs CLion
- IAR Embedded Workbench vs GNAT Pro
- IAR Embedded Workbench vs GNU Emacs
- IAR Embedded Workbench vs Keil MDK
- IAR Embedded Workbench vs Vite
- IAR Embedded Workbench vs Bazel
- IAR Embedded Workbench vs CodeSandbox
- IAR Embedded Workbench vs Eclipse IDE
- IAR Embedded Workbench vs Moonrepo
- IAR Embedded Workbench vs Nx Cloud

