Softwr

LMS · head to head

Chamilo vs MkDocs

Chamilo logo

Chamilo

LMS

Open source learning management system with no licence fee and a Latin American and francophone user base

From
Free
Rated
-
MkDocs logo

MkDocs

Documentation

Static site generator for project documentation in Markdown

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Chamilo version 3.0 has been in beta since 2024 while production deployments stay on the 1.11 branch, so anyone planning a multi-year deployment is choosing between an ageing stable line and an unfinished rewrite.; MkDocs no built-in versioning, which Docusaurus provides and documentation teams eventually need
  • They diverge on capability: Chamilo covers Course and learning paths, MkDocs covers Plain Markdown.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Chamilo and MkDocs actually diverge.

Attributes where Chamilo and MkDocs differ
AttributeChamiloMkDocs
PlatformsWeb, Self-hosted, LinuxWeb, Linux, macOS, Windows
CategoryLMSDocumentation

Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Open source, no licence fee), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Chamilo

  • Course and learning paths
  • Assessments
  • Gradebook and certificates
  • Attendance tracking
  • Sessions and multi-tenancy
  • Wide interface translation
  • Plugins
  • Low hosting requirements

Only in MkDocs

  • Plain Markdown
  • Single YAML config
  • Material theme
  • Live preview

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Chamilo

  • A Latin American university that needs an LMS with no per-student licence fee and Spanish-language support from people in a compatible time zonenot MkDocs
  • A ministry or NGO delivering vocational training over poor connectivity, where a lightweight PHP application on cheap hosting beats a heavyweight platformnot MkDocs
  • A francophone institution in West Africa or Belgium where French interface and documentation quality decides adoption more than feature countnot MkDocs
  • An organisation that requires the LMS to run entirely on its own infrastructure with no data leaving the countrynot MkDocs

MkDocs

  • Project documentation for teams that would rather not run a JavaScript toolchainnot Chamilo
  • Python projects keeping docs beside the codenot Chamilo
  • Documentation that must build fast in CI on every commitnot Chamilo

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Chamilo

  • Version 3.0 has been in beta since 2024 while production deployments stay on the 1.11 branch, so anyone planning a multi-year deployment is choosing between an ageing stable line and an unfinished rewrite.
  • Governance moved to BeezNest Belgium, a commercial company that also sells Chamilo hosting and services, which concentrates roadmap decisions in a vendor with a direct commercial interest in the support market.
  • The English-language community and documentation are noticeably thinner than the Spanish and French, so an anglophone institution will find fewer answers, fewer contributors and fewer consultants than the project size implies.
  • No licence fee is not no cost: hosting, upgrades, security patching, backups and integration work all fall on the institution or a paid partner, and that ongoing labour usually exceeds what a small institution would have paid for a hosted commercial LMS.
  • The third-party plugin ecosystem is small compared with Moodle, so integrations with proctoring, publisher content and student information systems often have to be commissioned rather than installed.

MkDocs

  • No built-in versioning, which Docusaurus provides and documentation teams eventually need
  • Extending past the theme means writing Python plugins
  • Markdown only, so embedding interactive components is not the model

Pricing, plan by plan

Chamilo

Free
  • Self-hostedFree
    • GNU GPL licence, no per-learner fee
    • Full source code
    • Community support in Spanish, French and English
  • Hosting and support from partners$undefined/year
    • Managed hosting, upgrades and support sold by BeezNest and other official providers
    • Priced per deployment, quoted

MkDocs

Free
  • MkDocsFree
    • Full functionality
    • Commercial use permitted
    • Community support

Which should you pick?

Choose Chamilo if

  • You need course and learning paths.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Self-hosted, Linux.
  • You also want assessments.

Choose MkDocs if

  • You need plain markdown.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows.
  • You also want single yaml config.

Questions people ask

Is Chamilo or MkDocs better?
Neither clearly leads. Chamilo starts at Free and MkDocs at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Chamilo or MkDocs?
Chamilo starts at Free and MkDocs at Free.
Does Chamilo or MkDocs run on more platforms?
Chamilo runs on Web, Self-hosted, Linux. MkDocs runs on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows.
Can I use Chamilo for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Chamilo best used for?
Chamilo is most often used for a latin american university that needs an lms with no per-student licence fee and spanish-language support from people in a compatible time zone, a ministry or ngo delivering vocational training over poor connectivity, where a lightweight php application on cheap hosting beats a heavyweight platform, a francophone institution in west africa or belgium where french interface and documentation quality decides adoption more than feature count, an organisation that requires the lms to run entirely on its own infrastructure with no data leaving the country. Of those, a latin american university that needs an lms with no per-student licence fee and spanish-language support from people in a compatible time zone and a ministry or ngo delivering vocational training over poor connectivity, where a lightweight php application on cheap hosting beats a heavyweight platform are not what MkDocs is typically brought in for.
What can Chamilo do that MkDocs cannot?
Chamilo covers Course and learning paths, Assessments, Gradebook and certificates, Attendance tracking. MkDocs covers Plain Markdown, Single YAML config, Material theme, Live preview.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Chamilo: Who owns and maintains Chamilo now?

The project has been governed by BeezNest Belgium since January 2026. The code remains under the GNU GPL, but roadmap stewardship sits with a commercial company that also sells Chamilo services.

MkDocs: Is MkDocs free?

Yes, open source under the BSD licence. The Material theme has a free version and a paid Insiders edition.

Chamilo: Is Chamilo 3 ready for production?

No. The 3.0 line has been in beta since 2024 and production installations remain on the 1.11 branch. Plan on 1.11 and treat the 3.0 migration as a future project.

MkDocs: MkDocs or Docusaurus?

MkDocs is simpler and faster to adopt, especially for Python teams. Docusaurus offers versioning, internationalisation and React components, which matter once documentation grows.

Chamilo: Is there a licence fee?

No. Chamilo is GPL software with no per-learner charge. Costs are hosting, support and whatever integration work you commission.

MkDocs: Does MkDocs support versioned docs?

Not natively. Plugins such as mike add it, where Docusaurus includes versioning in core.

Chamilo: Where is it strongest?

Spanish-speaking Latin America, Spain, francophone West Africa and Belgium. Support and documentation quality in Spanish and French exceed the English.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads