Cybersecurity · head to head
Chainguard vs Akeyless

Chainguard
Cybersecurity
Secure-by-default open source software with hardened container images and libraries
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Chainguard containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people; Akeyless pricing is usage-based and complex, requires sales consultation
- They diverge on capability: Chainguard covers Hardened container images, Akeyless covers Secrets management.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Chainguard and Akeyless actually diverge.
| Attribute | Chainguard | Akeyless |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Licensing by artifact type and team size | Usage-based pricing units that vary by product module |
| Platforms | Cloud, Container, VM | Cloud, Hybrid, On-Premises |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Chainguard
- Hardened container images
- CVE remediation SLA
- SLSA L2/L3 builds
- Sigstore signatures
- SBOM generation
- Language libraries
- VM images
- Artifact scanning
Only in Akeyless
- Secrets management
- Machine identity
- AI agent identity
- Certificate management
- Privileged access management
- Multi-vault governance
- Encryption and KMS
- Password manager
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Chainguard
- Deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surfacenot Akeyless
- Meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industriesnot Akeyless
- Reducing CVE exposure with contractual remediation guaranteesnot Akeyless
- Building secure language packages with automatic backportsnot Akeyless
- Verifying artifact provenance with Sigstore signaturesnot Akeyless
Akeyless
- Securing AI agents with dedicated identity trackingnot Chainguard
- Managing machine-to-machine credentials at scalenot Chainguard
- Automating PKI and certificate lifecyclenot Chainguard
- Implementing just-in-time privileged accessnot Chainguard
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Chainguard
- Containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people
- Per-image pricing for containers requires custom quotes with no transparency
- Free tier limited to 5 container images for testing
- Libraries pricing by ecosystem and developer count lacks transparent per-developer cost
- VM image catalog pricing opacity makes cost estimation difficult
Akeyless
- Pricing is usage-based and complex, requires sales consultation
- Free tier is very limited with restricted access
- No transparent pricing published for enterprise features
- Pricing model varies significantly by product module
Pricing, plan by plan
Chainguard
Free- Free TierFree
- Five container images to test and deploy
- Containers Per-Image$undefined/custom
- Licensed by quantity and type
- Base images, application images, AI/ML images, FIPS variants
- Custom pricing per image
- Containers Catalog$19000/year
- For 10-person engineering teams
- 2,000+ container images
- Contractual CVE remediation SLAs
- Libraries Licensing$undefined/custom
- Licensed by ecosystem (Python, Java, JavaScript)
- Licensed by developer count
- Unlimited pulls with no metering
Akeyless
Free- FreeFree
- Limited feature access
- Restricted usage quotas
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Custom pricing based on usage
- Unlimited resource quotas
- Full feature access
Which should you pick?
Choose Chainguard if
- You need hardened container images.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Container, VM.
- You also want cve remediation sla.
Choose Akeyless if
- You need secrets management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Hybrid, On-Premises.
- You also want machine identity.
Questions people ask
- Is Chainguard or Akeyless better?
- Neither clearly leads. Chainguard starts at Free and Akeyless at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Chainguard or Akeyless?
- Chainguard starts at Free and Akeyless at Free.
- Does Chainguard or Akeyless run on more platforms?
- Chainguard runs on Cloud, Container, VM. Akeyless runs on Cloud, Hybrid, On-Premises.
- Can I use Chainguard for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Chainguard best used for?
- Chainguard is most often used for deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface, meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries, reducing cve exposure with contractual remediation guarantees, building secure language packages with automatic backports. Of those, deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface and meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries are not what Akeyless is typically brought in for.
- What can Chainguard do that Akeyless cannot?
- Chainguard covers Hardened container images, CVE remediation SLA, SLSA L2/L3 builds, Sigstore signatures. Akeyless covers Secrets management, Machine identity, AI agent identity, Certificate management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Chainguard: How much is the Chainguard Containers Catalog?
The Containers Catalog is 19,000 USD per year for 10-person engineering teams, providing access to 2,000+ hardened container images.
SourceAkeyless: What pricing model does Akeyless use?
Akeyless uses usage-based pricing units that vary by product. For example, Secrets Management is priced by clients, Certificate Management by managed certificates, Encryption by transactions, and PAM by users. Contact sales for a custom quote.
SourceChainguard: What SLAs does Chainguard offer?
Chainguard provides contractual CVE remediation SLAs: 7 days for critical vulnerabilities, 14 days for high/medium/low severity, all with priority support.
SourceAkeyless: Does Akeyless support hybrid deployment?
Yes, Akeyless offers Pure SaaS cloud-managed deployment and Hybrid SaaS with on-premise gateways and zero-knowledge encryption for sensitive environments.
SourceChainguard: Can I try Chainguard before purchasing?
Yes. The free tier includes five container images for testing and deployment, allowing hands-on evaluation.
SourceAkeyless: How does Akeyless handle AI agent identities?
Akeyless provides dedicated AI agent identity tracking with runtime access control, allowing organizations to manage AI agent access separately from human and machine identities.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Chainguard vs 1Password
- Chainguard vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Chainguard vs Norton 360
- Chainguard vs LastPass
- Chainguard vs Snyk
- Chainguard vs Bitwarden
- Chainguard vs Brave Browser
- Chainguard vs Clerk
- Chainguard vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Chainguard vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Chainguard vs Mullvad VPN
- Chainguard vs OneTrust
- Chainguard vs Private Internet Access
- Chainguard vs Proton Mail
- Chainguard vs Tuta
- Chainguard vs Doppler
- Chainguard vs Frontegg
- Chainguard vs Infisical
- Akeyless vs 1Password
- Akeyless vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Akeyless vs Norton 360
- Akeyless vs LastPass
- Akeyless vs Snyk
- Akeyless vs Bitwarden
- Akeyless vs Brave Browser
- Akeyless vs Clerk
- Akeyless vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Akeyless vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Akeyless vs Mullvad VPN
- Akeyless vs OneTrust
- Akeyless vs Private Internet Access
- Akeyless vs Proton Mail
- Akeyless vs Tuta
- Akeyless vs Doppler
- Akeyless vs Frontegg
- Akeyless vs Infisical

