Networking · head to head
Catchpoint vs Nebula

Catchpoint
Networking
Internet and digital experience monitoring, with a genuinely published entry price through its WebPageTest product line
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Nebula
Networking
Certificate based overlay network from Slack, with identity and firewall rules carried in the certificate
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Catchpoint its flagship enterprise Internet Performance Monitoring product reverts to custom Enterprise pricing beyond the Quick Start package, so full-scale deployment cost is not knowable from the public site; Nebula the open source project has no user interface, no enrolment workflow and no revocation service, so certificate issuing, distribution and expiry become scripts you write and then have to keep working.
- They diverge on capability: Catchpoint covers Global vantage point network, Nebula covers Certificate carried identity.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Catchpoint and Nebula actually diverge.
| Attribute | Catchpoint | Nebula |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Free tier plus published entry tiers, enterprise quote-only | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Web | Linux, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android, FreeBSD |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Networking).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Catchpoint
- Global vantage point network
- WebPageTest integration
- BGP and DNS monitoring
- Real user monitoring
- Token-based points model
Only in Nebula
- Certificate carried identity
- Group based host firewall
- Lighthouse discovery
- Noise protocol encryption
- Unsafe routes
- Managed option
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Catchpoint
- A web performance engineer wanting a fuller-featured, paid version of WebPageTest with longer retention and more locationsnot Nebula
- An enterprise SRE or network team monitoring internet-dependent application delivery, DNS and CDN performance at scalenot Nebula
- An organisation wanting BGP-level visibility into internet routing issues affecting its servicesnot Nebula
- A team wanting real user monitoring with session replay alongside synthetic testing from one vendornot Nebula
Nebula
- Flattening a network across several clouds and datacentres without VPC peering or route tablesnot Catchpoint
- Very large fleets where a central policy service on the connection path is unacceptablenot Catchpoint
- Environments that already run an internal certificate authority and want the network to use itnot Catchpoint
- Replacing per host iptables rules with policy written against roles that follow the hostnot Catchpoint
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Catchpoint
- Its flagship enterprise Internet Performance Monitoring product reverts to custom Enterprise pricing beyond the Quick Start package, so full-scale deployment cost is not knowable from the public site
- The token-based points model, while flexible, requires understanding point consumption per test type to budget usage accurately, which is not always intuitive upfront
- The IPM Quick Start Package carries a 12-month minimum commitment, so there is no genuinely short-term way to trial the enterprise product at scale
- WebPageTest's published tiers are aimed at web performance testing specifically; the broader enterprise IPM feature set (BGP, DNS, CDN monitoring) is not available at those lower published prices
- As with ThousandEyes, meaningful internet path visibility depends on a large distributed vantage point network that only the vendor controls, so coverage gaps in specific regions are not something a buyer can fix themselves
- Session replay and RUM features are gated to the Expert tier and above, so lower tiers give synthetic testing only, without the real user data many teams actually want
Nebula
- The open source project has no user interface, no enrolment workflow and no revocation service, so certificate issuing, distribution and expiry become scripts you write and then have to keep working.
- Revoking a compromised host means distributing a blocklist entry to every other host and reloading them, which is a fleet wide operation rather than a click, and easy to get wrong under pressure.
- Changing a host group membership means reissuing and redeploying its certificate, so policy changes are a deployment rather than a configuration edit.
- There is no identity provider integration or single sign on in the open source version, so it maps well to servers and badly to a fleet of user laptops.
- NAT traversal is best effort and hosts behind symmetric NAT need a relay configured deliberately, so connectivity failures show up as intermittent rather than immediate and are awkward to diagnose.
Pricing, plan by plan
Catchpoint
Free- WebPageTest StarterFree
- 150 monthly test runs
- 60-day retention
- 30 global locations
- WebPageTest Professional$180/year
- 1,000-20,000 monthly test runs
- 13-month retention
- 40 global locations
- WebPageTest Expert$11988/year
- Real user monitoring with session replay
- Unlimited users with SSO
- 3,000+ agents across 300+ cities
- IPM Quick Start$10000/year
- Single end-to-end journey monitoring
- DNS, SSL, CDN and API monitoring
Nebula
Free- NebulaFree
- Full functionality under the MIT licence
- No host limit
- You operate the certificate authority and lighthouses
- Defined Networking$undefined/month
- Hosted control plane and enrolment
- Managed certificate lifecycle and revocation
- Policy and DNS interface
Which should you pick?
Choose Catchpoint if
- You need global vantage point network.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want webpagetest integration.
Choose Nebula if
- You need certificate carried identity.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android, FreeBSD.
- You also want group based host firewall.
Questions people ask
- Is Catchpoint or Nebula better?
- Neither clearly leads. Catchpoint starts at Free and Nebula at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Catchpoint or Nebula?
- Catchpoint starts at Free and Nebula at Free.
- Does Catchpoint or Nebula run on more platforms?
- Catchpoint runs on Web. Nebula runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android, FreeBSD.
- Can I use Catchpoint for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Catchpoint best used for?
- Catchpoint is most often used for a web performance engineer wanting a fuller-featured, paid version of webpagetest with longer retention and more locations, an enterprise sre or network team monitoring internet-dependent application delivery, dns and cdn performance at scale, an organisation wanting bgp-level visibility into internet routing issues affecting its services, a team wanting real user monitoring with session replay alongside synthetic testing from one vendor. Of those, a web performance engineer wanting a fuller-featured, paid version of webpagetest with longer retention and more locations and an enterprise sre or network team monitoring internet-dependent application delivery, dns and cdn performance at scale are not what Nebula is typically brought in for.
- What can Catchpoint do that Nebula cannot?
- Catchpoint covers Global vantage point network, WebPageTest integration, BGP and DNS monitoring, Real user monitoring. Nebula covers Certificate carried identity, Group based host firewall, Lighthouse discovery, Noise protocol encryption.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Catchpoint: Is there a free tier?
Yes, WebPageTest Starter is free with 150 monthly test runs.
Nebula: Does it use WireGuard?
No. Nebula predates the common WireGuard mesh tools and uses the Noise protocol framework with its own certificate format.
Catchpoint: Is enterprise IPM pricing published?
Only the entry Quick Start Package at $10,000/year with a 12-month minimum; full Enterprise pricing is custom.
Nebula: Can I run it without Defined Networking?
Yes, entirely. Defined Networking sells the control plane conveniences, not the network itself.
Catchpoint: Does Catchpoint own WebPageTest?
Yes, Catchpoint operates WebPageTest as a productised offering with its own tiered pricing.
Nebula: How do I revoke a host?
Add its certificate fingerprint to the blocklist in the configuration of the other hosts and reload them. There is no online revocation check.
Nebula: Is it a good fit for laptops?
Less so than the identity provider based tools. There is no single sign on, so every laptop needs a certificate issued and renewed by whatever process you build.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Catchpoint vs ThousandEyes
- Catchpoint vs Kentik
- Catchpoint vs HiveMQ
- Catchpoint vs Cloudflare
- Catchpoint vs NetBird
- Catchpoint vs Domotz
- Catchpoint vs Cisco Meraki
- Catchpoint vs OpenVPN
- Catchpoint vs Icinga
- Catchpoint vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Catchpoint vs ZeroTier
- Catchpoint vs Consul
- Catchpoint vs LibreNMS
- Catchpoint vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Catchpoint vs Zabbix
- Catchpoint vs Tailscale
- Catchpoint vs pfSense
- Catchpoint vs Headscale
- Catchpoint vs Traefik
- Catchpoint vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Catchpoint vs Netdata
- Catchpoint vs OPNsense
- Nebula vs ThousandEyes
- Nebula vs Kentik
- Nebula vs HiveMQ
- Nebula vs Cloudflare
- Nebula vs NetBird
- Nebula vs Domotz
- Nebula vs Cisco Meraki
- Nebula vs OpenVPN
- Nebula vs Icinga
- Nebula vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Nebula vs ZeroTier
- Nebula vs Consul
- Nebula vs LibreNMS
- Nebula vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Nebula vs Zabbix
- Nebula vs Tailscale
- Nebula vs pfSense
- Nebula vs Headscale
- Nebula vs Traefik
- Nebula vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Nebula vs Netdata
- Nebula vs OPNsense
