Cloud · head to head
Caddy vs Nebula

Nebula
Networking
Certificate based overlay network from Slack, with identity and firewall rules carried in the certificate
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Caddy smaller ecosystem than Nginx, so third-party guides and modules are fewer; Nebula the open source project has no user interface, no enrolment workflow and no revocation service, so certificate issuing, distribution and expiry become scripts you write and then have to keep working.
- They diverge on capability: Caddy covers Automatic HTTPS, Nebula covers Certificate carried identity.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Caddy and Nebula actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Open source, no licence fee), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Caddy
- Automatic HTTPS
- Caddyfile
- Reverse proxy
- Single binary
Only in Nebula
- Certificate carried identity
- Group based host firewall
- Lighthouse discovery
- Noise protocol encryption
- Unsafe routes
- Managed option
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Caddy
- Sites and services where expired certificates have caused outages beforenot Nebula
- Small deployments where Nginx configuration is more effort than the problem warrantsnot Nebula
- Reverse proxying internal services with TLS without a certificate workflownot Nebula
Nebula
- Flattening a network across several clouds and datacentres without VPC peering or route tablesnot Caddy
- Very large fleets where a central policy service on the connection path is unacceptablenot Caddy
- Environments that already run an internal certificate authority and want the network to use itnot Caddy
- Replacing per host iptables rules with policy written against roles that follow the hostnot Caddy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Caddy
- Smaller ecosystem than Nginx, so third-party guides and modules are fewer
- Adding plugins means rebuilding the binary rather than loading a module
- Under very high throughput Nginx generally still benchmarks ahead
- Automatic certificate issuance needs outbound internet access, which complicates air-gapped deployments
Nebula
- The open source project has no user interface, no enrolment workflow and no revocation service, so certificate issuing, distribution and expiry become scripts you write and then have to keep working.
- Revoking a compromised host means distributing a blocklist entry to every other host and reloading them, which is a fleet wide operation rather than a click, and easy to get wrong under pressure.
- Changing a host group membership means reissuing and redeploying its certificate, so policy changes are a deployment rather than a configuration edit.
- There is no identity provider integration or single sign on in the open source version, so it maps well to servers and badly to a fleet of user laptops.
- NAT traversal is best effort and hosts behind symmetric NAT need a relay configured deliberately, so connectivity failures show up as intermittent rather than immediate and are awkward to diagnose.
Pricing, plan by plan
Caddy
Free- CaddyFree
- Full functionality
- Commercial use permitted
- Community support
Nebula
Free- NebulaFree
- Full functionality under the MIT licence
- No host limit
- You operate the certificate authority and lighthouses
- Defined Networking$undefined/month
- Hosted control plane and enrolment
- Managed certificate lifecycle and revocation
- Policy and DNS interface
Which should you pick?
Choose Caddy if
- You need automatic https.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
- You also want caddyfile.
Choose Nebula if
- You need certificate carried identity.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android, FreeBSD.
- You also want group based host firewall.
Questions people ask
- Is Caddy or Nebula better?
- Neither clearly leads. Caddy starts at Free and Nebula at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Caddy or Nebula?
- Caddy starts at Free and Nebula at Free.
- Does Caddy or Nebula run on more platforms?
- Caddy runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker. Nebula runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android, FreeBSD.
- Can I use Caddy for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Caddy best used for?
- Caddy is most often used for sites and services where expired certificates have caused outages before, small deployments where nginx configuration is more effort than the problem warrants, reverse proxying internal services with tls without a certificate workflow. Of those, sites and services where expired certificates have caused outages before and small deployments where nginx configuration is more effort than the problem warrants are not what Nebula is typically brought in for.
- What can Caddy do that Nebula cannot?
- Caddy covers Automatic HTTPS, Caddyfile, Reverse proxy, Single binary. Nebula covers Certificate carried identity, Group based host firewall, Lighthouse discovery, Noise protocol encryption.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Caddy: Is Caddy free?
Yes, open source under the Apache 2.0 licence, free for commercial use.
Nebula: Does it use WireGuard?
No. Nebula predates the common WireGuard mesh tools and uses the Noise protocol framework with its own certificate format.
Caddy: What does automatic HTTPS mean?
Caddy obtains certificates from Let’s Encrypt or ZeroSSL on first request and renews them before expiry, with no cron job or configuration.
Nebula: Can I run it without Defined Networking?
Yes, entirely. Defined Networking sells the control plane conveniences, not the network itself.
Caddy: Caddy or Nginx?
Caddy is dramatically simpler to configure and removes certificate management. Nginx has the larger ecosystem and better peak throughput.
Nebula: How do I revoke a host?
Add its certificate fingerprint to the blocklist in the configuration of the other hosts and reload them. There is no online revocation check.
Nebula: Is it a good fit for laptops?
Less so than the identity provider based tools. There is no single sign on, so every laptop needs a certificate issued and renewed by whatever process you build.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Caddy vs HAProxy
- Caddy vs Packer
- Caddy vs Pulumi
- Caddy vs Portworx
- Caddy vs Podman
- Caddy vs Rancher
- Caddy vs Porter
- Caddy vs Flux
- Caddy vs Contabo
- Caddy vs Coolify
- Caddy vs Crossplane
- Caddy vs Dokku
- Caddy vs Encore
- Caddy vs Vagrant
- Caddy vs Buildah
- Caddy vs Kustomize
- Caddy vs Skopeo
- Caddy vs containerd
- Caddy vs NetBird
- Caddy vs Tailscale
- Caddy vs pfSense
- Caddy vs Icinga
- Caddy vs Zabbix
- Caddy vs Consul
- Caddy vs LibreNMS
- Caddy vs OpenVPN
- Caddy vs Headscale
- Caddy vs Traefik
- Caddy vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Caddy vs Cisco Meraki
- Caddy vs Domotz
- Caddy vs HiveMQ
- Caddy vs Netdata
- Caddy vs OPNsense
- Nebula vs HAProxy
- Nebula vs Packer
- Nebula vs Pulumi
- Nebula vs Portworx
- Nebula vs Podman
- Nebula vs Rancher
- Nebula vs Porter
- Nebula vs Flux
- Nebula vs Contabo
- Nebula vs Coolify
- Nebula vs Crossplane
- Nebula vs Dokku
- Nebula vs Encore
- Nebula vs Vagrant
- Nebula vs Buildah
- Nebula vs Kustomize
- Nebula vs Skopeo
- Nebula vs containerd
- Nebula vs NetBird
- Nebula vs Tailscale
- Nebula vs pfSense
- Nebula vs Icinga
- Nebula vs Zabbix
- Nebula vs Consul
- Nebula vs LibreNMS
- Nebula vs OpenVPN
- Nebula vs Headscale
- Nebula vs Traefik
- Nebula vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Nebula vs Cisco Meraki
- Nebula vs Domotz
- Nebula vs HiveMQ
- Nebula vs Netdata
- Nebula vs OPNsense

