Developer Tools · head to head
Buildkite vs Soketi

Buildkite
Developer Tools
CI/CD pipelines that run on your own compute
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Soketi
Developer Tools
Self-hosted, Pusher-compatible WebSockets server with a stalled maintenance record
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Buildkite free plan caps at 5 users and 10 concurrent jobs, with 2,000 Linux vCPU minutes per month and 30 day build retention; Soketi maintenance has effectively stalled: the maintainer has said time is severely limited, releases are infrequent, and the community has been discussing whether the project is abandoned, which means security fixes may not arrive.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Buildkite and Soketi actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Buildkite
Nothing recorded that Soketi does not also cover.
Only in Soketi
- Pusher protocol compatibility
- Presence and private channels
- Horizontal scaling
- App management backends
- Webhooks
- Prometheus metrics
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Buildkite
- CI/CD pipeline automationnot Soketi
- Test execution at scalenot Soketi
- Deployment automationnot Soketi
Soketi
- A Laravel application that already uses Echo and wants to stop paying a hosted realtime providernot Buildkite
- Realtime notifications or presence indicators where data must not leave your own infrastructure for compliance reasonsnot Buildkite
- A local or CI environment that needs a Pusher-compatible server without hitting a paid accountnot Buildkite
- A high-connection-count application where hosted per-connection pricing has become the largest line in the infrastructure billnot Buildkite
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Buildkite
- Free plan caps at 5 users and 10 concurrent jobs, with 2,000 Linux vCPU minutes per month and 30 day build retention
- Pro plan is $30 per active user per month, capped at 50 users, with only 10 of the up to 250 concurrent agents included before extra usage
- Enterprise plan enforces a 30 user minimum even though pricing itself is custom
- Hosted compute beyond included minutes is metered at $0.004 per vCPU minute on Linux and $0.02 per vCPU minute on Mac
Soketi
- Maintenance has effectively stalled: the maintainer has said time is severely limited, releases are infrequent, and the community has been discussing whether the project is abandoned, which means security fixes may not arrive.
- Dependency drift on Node and uWebSockets.js will eventually force you to fork or migrate, and that cost is unbudgeted at the point you adopt it.
- There is no commercial support to buy, so a production incident at three in the morning is entirely your problem with no escalation path.
- Scaling beyond a single node needs Redis and careful configuration, and getting presence channels correct across nodes is a genuine source of subtle bugs.
- It implements the Pusher protocol rather than tracking it, so any protocol feature Pusher adds later will not appear, and the compatibility guarantee slowly decays.
Pricing, plan by plan
Buildkite
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 5 users
- 10 concurrent jobs
- 2000 Linux vCPU minutes monthly
- Pro$30/month
- Up to 50 users
- 250 concurrent agents (10 included)
- 4000 Linux vCPU minutes monthly
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Unlimited users (30 minimum)
- Custom usage limits
- Full platform access
Soketi
Free- SoketiFree
- MIT licensed
- Unlimited connections subject to your own hardware
- No vendor billing
Which should you pick?
Choose Soketi if
- You need pusher protocol compatibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want presence and private channels.
Questions people ask
- Is Buildkite or Soketi better?
- Neither clearly leads. Buildkite starts at Free and Soketi at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Buildkite or Soketi?
- Buildkite starts at Free and Soketi at Free.
- Does Buildkite or Soketi run on more platforms?
- Buildkite runs on Web. Soketi runs on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use Buildkite for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Buildkite best used for?
- Buildkite is most often used for ci/cd pipeline automation, test execution at scale, deployment automation. Of those, ci/cd pipeline automation and test execution at scale are not what Soketi is typically brought in for.
- What can Buildkite do that Soketi cannot?
- Soketi covers Pusher protocol compatibility, Presence and private channels, Horizontal scaling, App management backends.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Buildkite: Can I use Buildkite without paying?
Yes, Buildkite offers a free plan that includes up to 5 users, 10 concurrent jobs, 2000 Linux vCPU minutes monthly, and 250k test executions per month at no cost.
SourceSoketi: Is Soketi still maintained?
Barely. The maintainer has stated that available time is very limited and releases have been sparse; treat it as community-maintained.
Buildkite: What happens if I exceed my included compute minutes on Buildkite?
Hosted agent compute is charged separately at $0.004 per Linux vCPU minute and $0.02 per Mac vCPU minute, billed to the second with no minimums.
SourceSoketi: Do I need to change my client code?
No. Pusher client SDKs and Laravel Echo work by changing the host, port and credentials.
Buildkite: Do I need an annual commitment for Buildkite's Pro plan?
No, Buildkite's Pro plan is billed monthly at $30 per active user with no long-term contract required. All tiers include a 30-day all-access trial.
SourceSoketi: What does it cost?
Nothing in licence fees. It is MIT licensed; you pay for the server it runs on.
Buildkite: What user limits apply to each Buildkite plan?
Free plan supports up to 5 users, Pro plan supports up to 50 users, and Enterprise plan provides unlimited users with a 30-user minimum.
SourceSoketi: What are people moving to?
Laravel Reverb for Laravel applications, and Sockudo, a Rust reimplementation, for others.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Buildkite vs Depot
- Buildkite vs Dagger
- Buildkite vs pnpm
- Buildkite vs Turborepo
- Buildkite vs Visual Studio Code
- Buildkite vs ESLint
- Buildkite vs GitLab CI/CD
- Buildkite vs Keycloak
- Buildkite vs Nx Cloud
- Buildkite vs Yarn
- Buildkite vs Atlantis
- Buildkite vs Coder
- Buildkite vs Helm
- Buildkite vs Jitsu
- Buildkite vs Notepad++
- Buildkite vs Prettier
- Buildkite vs StackBlitz
- Buildkite vs Steampipe
- Buildkite vs PartyKit
- Buildkite vs Penpot
- Buildkite vs Backstage
- Buildkite vs GNU Emacs
- Buildkite vs Bazel
- Buildkite vs Eclipse IDE
- Buildkite vs Pants Build
- Buildkite vs Swagger UI
- Buildkite vs Ansible
- Buildkite vs Cody
- Buildkite vs ConfigCat
- Buildkite vs Cortex
- Buildkite vs Deno
- Buildkite vs Fig
- Soketi vs Depot
- Soketi vs Dagger
- Soketi vs pnpm
- Soketi vs Turborepo
- Soketi vs Visual Studio Code
- Soketi vs ESLint
- Soketi vs GitLab CI/CD
- Soketi vs Keycloak
- Soketi vs Nx Cloud
- Soketi vs Yarn
- Soketi vs Atlantis
- Soketi vs Coder
- Soketi vs Helm
- Soketi vs Jitsu
- Soketi vs Notepad++
- Soketi vs Prettier
- Soketi vs StackBlitz
- Soketi vs Steampipe
- Soketi vs PartyKit
- Soketi vs Penpot
- Soketi vs Backstage
- Soketi vs GNU Emacs
- Soketi vs Bazel
- Soketi vs Eclipse IDE
- Soketi vs Pants Build
- Soketi vs Swagger UI
- Soketi vs Ansible
- Soketi vs Cody
- Soketi vs ConfigCat
- Soketi vs Cortex
- Soketi vs Deno
- Soketi vs Fig
