Automation Integration · head to head
Browser Use vs Kogito

Browser Use
Automation Integration
Give Browser Use a natural-language task and receive completed work from a managed browser agent
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Kogito
Automation Integration
Cloud-native business automation for Quarkus, now an Apache KIE component
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Browser Use annual plans cost 10 months of fees but provide 12 months of credits (Dev: $290/year with $360 credits); Kogito kogito is a developer framework, not a product, so there is no equivalent of Camunda Operate for business users and any process monitoring interface has to be built or bought separately.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Browser Use and Kogito actually diverge.
| Attribute | Browser Use | Kogito |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Web | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Browser Use
Nothing recorded that Kogito does not also cover.
Only in Kogito
- Build-time code generation
- Quarkus and Spring Boot support
- DMN decision services
- Drools rules engine
- Serverless workflow
- Kubernetes operator
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Browser Use
- Web automationnot Kogito
- Browser task automationnot Kogito
Kogito
- A Quarkus microservice that must expose a DMN decision model as a REST endpoint with millisecond start-upnot Browser Use
- Serverless deployment of business rules where a traditional BPM server would be far too heavynot Browser Use
- A Red Hat shop that wants the upstream of Red Hat process automation with the option of a supported build laternot Browser Use
- Replacing hand-coded conditional logic with DMN tables that business analysts can review and amendnot Browser Use
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Browser Use
- Annual plans cost 10 months of fees but provide 12 months of credits (Dev: $290/year with $360 credits)
- Proxy costs extra: $4-5/GB managed residential proxy
- Cloud browser sessions add $0.02/hour minimum 1 minute
Kogito
- Kogito is a developer framework, not a product, so there is no equivalent of Camunda Operate for business users and any process monitoring interface has to be built or bought separately.
- Long-running stateful processes need external persistence and messaging that you configure and operate yourself, which removes much of the convenience a BPM server normally provides.
- It sits inside the Apache KIE incubator, and incubating status means graduation is not guaranteed and the project name and artefact coordinates have already changed once.
- Red Hat is by far the dominant contributor despite ASF stewardship, so the roadmap follows Red Hat product priorities rather than community demand.
- Documentation is spread across legacy JBoss sites, the old Kogito site and the new Apache KIE site, and search results routinely land on outdated versions, which costs real time during adoption.
Pricing, plan by plan
Browser Use
Free- FreeFree
- 10 agent tasks/month
- 3 concurrent sessions
- Dev$29/month
- $29 monthly credits
- 25 concurrent sessions
- Business$299/month
- $299 monthly credits
- 200 concurrent sessions
- Scaleup$999/month
- $999 monthly credits
- 500 concurrent sessions
Kogito
Free- KogitoFree
- Apache 2.0 licence
- Apache KIE incubating project
- No usage limits
Which should you pick?
Choose Kogito if
- You need build-time code generation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want quarkus and spring boot support.
Questions people ask
- Is Browser Use or Kogito better?
- Neither clearly leads. Browser Use starts at Free and Kogito at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Browser Use or Kogito?
- Browser Use starts at Free and Kogito at Free.
- Does Browser Use or Kogito run on more platforms?
- Browser Use runs on Web. Kogito runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Browser Use for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Browser Use best used for?
- Browser Use is most often used for web automation, browser task automation. Of those, web automation and browser task automation are not what Kogito is typically brought in for.
- What can Browser Use do that Kogito cannot?
- Kogito covers Build-time code generation, Quarkus and Spring Boot support, DMN decision services, Drools rules engine.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Browser Use: How much does Browser Use's Dev plan cost?
The Dev plan costs $29 per month and includes $29 in monthly agent credits, 25 concurrent sessions, and browser automation capabilities.
SourceKogito: Is Kogito still maintained?
Yes. It is an Apache KIE incubating project with active commits, with Red Hat as the dominant contributor.
Browser Use: What is the cost of Browser Use's cloud browser sessions?
Cloud browser sessions cost $0.02 per browser-hour with a one-minute minimum, rounded up to the nearest minute.
SourceKogito: How does it differ from jBPM?
Kogito compiles process and rule definitions into application code at build time; jBPM was a runtime engine that loads definitions.
Browser Use: Does Browser Use offer a free plan?
Browser Use's free plan includes 10 agent tasks per month and 3 concurrent sessions at no cost, available without payment information.
SourceKogito: Does it need Quarkus?
It is designed for Quarkus and supports Spring Boot; both are Java frameworks rather than a standalone server.
Browser Use: How much do Browser Use's annual subscriptions save compared to monthly?
Annual subscriptions cost 10 months of fees: Dev costs $290/year with $360 credits, Business costs $2,990/year with $3,600 credits, and Scaleup costs $9,990/year with $12,000 credits.
SourceKogito: Is there commercial support?
Not from Apache. Red Hat sells supported builds of this lineage as part of its subscriptions.
Related pages
More on Browser Use
Other head to heads
- Browser Use vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Browser Use vs Zapier
- Browser Use vs n8n
- Browser Use vs MuleSoft
- Browser Use vs Temporal
- Browser Use vs CrewAI
- Browser Use vs Autonoly
- Browser Use vs Browserbase
- Browser Use vs Decodable
- Browser Use vs Trigger.dev
- Browser Use vs Dagster
- Browser Use vs RudderStack
- Browser Use vs Stitch
- Browser Use vs Talend
- Browser Use vs Tealium
- Browser Use vs Tines
- Browser Use vs Xano
- Browser Use vs Flowable
- Browser Use vs Camunda
- Browser Use vs Activiti
- Browser Use vs Blue Prism
- Browser Use vs Mage AI
- Browser Use vs Nintex
- Kogito vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Kogito vs Zapier
- Kogito vs n8n
- Kogito vs MuleSoft
- Kogito vs Temporal
- Kogito vs CrewAI
- Kogito vs Autonoly
- Kogito vs Browserbase
- Kogito vs Decodable
- Kogito vs Trigger.dev
- Kogito vs Dagster
- Kogito vs RudderStack
- Kogito vs Stitch
- Kogito vs Talend
- Kogito vs Tealium
- Kogito vs Tines
- Kogito vs Xano
- Kogito vs Flowable
- Kogito vs Camunda
- Kogito vs Activiti
- Kogito vs Blue Prism
- Kogito vs Mage AI
- Kogito vs Nintex
