ERP · head to head
Bling vs Ivalua

Bling
ERP
Brazilian ERP for invoicing, orders, marketplace integration and inventory
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Ivalua
ERP
Source-to-pay on one codebase and one data model, sold to large enterprises by module
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Bling has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Bling entry Cobalto plan at R$60/month caps marketplace and API orders at 200 per month, with only 60 MB of data storage and 1.2 GB of file storage; Ivalua entry deployments are reported around 150,000 US dollars a year before implementation, which puts it entirely out of reach for mid-market procurement teams.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bling and Ivalua actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (ERP).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bling
Nothing recorded that Ivalua does not also cover.
Only in Ivalua
- Single data model
- Supplier risk and onboarding
- Contract lifecycle management
- Direct materials procurement
- Invoice matching and payment
- Configurable workflow engine
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bling
- E-commerce order managementnot Ivalua
- Marketplace integrationnot Ivalua
- Inventory managementnot Ivalua
Ivalua
- A manufacturer that needs direct materials sourcing tied to a bill of materials, not just indirect spendnot Bling
- An enterprise whose last procurement programme failed because supplier master data could not be reconciled across modulesnot Bling
- A regulated organisation needing third-party risk screening enforced before a supplier can receive a purchase ordernot Bling
- Replacing separate sourcing, contract and invoice systems where each holds a different version of the supplier recordnot Bling
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bling
- Entry Cobalto plan at R$60/month caps marketplace and API orders at 200 per month, with only 60 MB of data storage and 1.2 GB of file storage
- The top Elite tier is priced only by custom quote rather than a published figure, unlike the three tiers below it
Ivalua
- Entry deployments are reported around 150,000 US dollars a year before implementation, which puts it entirely out of reach for mid-market procurement teams.
- Configurability requires an internal product owner and usually a systems integrator, so the total programme cost is a multiple of the licence and the failure modes are those of an ERP project.
- Module-based licensing means capability you assumed was included, such as contract lifecycle management or supplier risk, is frequently a separate line item discovered late in the negotiation.
- Supplier network pricing scales with active supplier count, so an organisation with a long tail of small suppliers pays for records that generate little spend.
- The user interface prioritises configurability over ease, and casual requisitioners across the business need more guidance than a consumer-style intake tool would require.
Pricing, plan by plan
Bling
Free- Cobalto$60/month
- 5 users
- 60 MB data, 1.2 GB files
- Up to 200 orders
- Titânio$120/month
- 50 users
- 120 MB data, 3 GB files
- 500+ orders
- Diamante$650/month
- 100 users
- 1.8 GB data, 45 GB files
- Up to 10,000 orders
- Elite$null/mo
- Unlimited users
- 5 GB data, 50 GB files
- 10,000+ orders
Ivalua
On request- Ivalua Source-to-Pay$undefined/year
- Module-based licensing rather than per seat
- User counts tiered by role category
- Supplier network pricing driven by active supplier count
Which should you pick?
Choose Ivalua if
- You need single data model.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want supplier risk and onboarding.
Questions people ask
- Is Bling or Ivalua better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bling starts at Free and Ivalua at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bling or Ivalua?
- Bling has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Bling and On request for Ivalua.
- Does Bling or Ivalua run on more platforms?
- Bling runs on Web. Ivalua runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Bling for free?
- Yes. Bling has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Ivalua starts at On request.
- What is Bling best used for?
- Bling is most often used for e-commerce order management, marketplace integration, inventory management. Of those, e-commerce order management and marketplace integration are not what Ivalua is typically brought in for.
- What can Bling do that Ivalua cannot?
- Ivalua covers Single data model, Supplier risk and onboarding, Contract lifecycle management, Direct materials procurement.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bling: What are Bling's pricing tiers?
Cobalto is R$60/month for 5 users; Titânio is R$120/month for 50 users; Diamante is R$650/month for 100 users; Elite has custom pricing for unlimited users.
SourceIvalua: What does the single codebase actually buy me?
One supplier and contract record used across every module, so there is no synchronisation layer to reconcile and no data drift between sourcing and invoicing.
Bling: What storage limits does Bling provide?
Storage increases per tier: Cobalto has 60 MB data and 1.2 GB files; Titânio has 120 MB data and 3 GB files; Diamante has 1.8 GB data and 45 GB files; Elite has 5 GB data and 50 GB files.
SourceIvalua: What does Ivalua cost?
It is not published. Third parties report entry deployments around 150,000 USD a year and full-platform deployments above 400,000, plus implementation.
Bling: What order limits does each Bling plan support?
Cobalto supports up to 200 orders; Titânio supports 500+ orders; Diamante supports up to 10,000 orders; Elite supports 10,000+ orders with custom configuration.
SourceIvalua: Does it handle direct materials?
Yes, which distinguishes it from suites built primarily for indirect spend.
Ivalua: Is Ivalua still independent?
Yes. It is one of the few large source-to-pay vendors not owned by a bigger enterprise software group.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Bling vs DEAR Systems
- Bling vs Fishbowl
- Bling vs MRPeasy
- Bling vs Infor CloudSuite
- Bling vs Holded
- Bling vs NetSuite
- Bling vs Jaggaer
- Bling vs bexio
- Bling vs Blue Link ERP
- Bling vs Cin7 Core
- Bling vs Omie
- Bling vs TallyPrime
- Bling vs Zip
- Bling vs GEP SMART
- Bling vs Global Shop Solutions
- Bling vs Infor
- Bling vs Java
- Bling vs Levelpath
- Bling vs Zycus
- Bling vs Axelor
- Bling vs IFS Cloud
- Bling vs Epicor
- Bling vs IQMS
- Bling vs Omnea
- Bling vs Cegid
- Bling vs Dolibarr
- Bling vs Tyler Enterprise ERP (Munis)
- Bling vs QAD Adaptive ERP
- Bling vs Sage X3
- Bling vs SYSPRO
- Bling vs ADempiere
- Bling vs Apache OFBiz
- Bling vs Aptean
- Ivalua vs DEAR Systems
- Ivalua vs Fishbowl
- Ivalua vs MRPeasy
- Ivalua vs Infor CloudSuite
- Ivalua vs Holded
- Ivalua vs NetSuite
- Ivalua vs Jaggaer
- Ivalua vs bexio
- Ivalua vs Blue Link ERP
- Ivalua vs Cin7 Core
- Ivalua vs Omie
- Ivalua vs TallyPrime
- Ivalua vs Zip
- Ivalua vs GEP SMART
- Ivalua vs Global Shop Solutions
- Ivalua vs Infor
- Ivalua vs Java
- Ivalua vs Levelpath
- Ivalua vs Zycus
- Ivalua vs Axelor
- Ivalua vs IFS Cloud
- Ivalua vs Epicor
- Ivalua vs IQMS
- Ivalua vs Omnea
- Ivalua vs Cegid
- Ivalua vs Dolibarr
- Ivalua vs Tyler Enterprise ERP (Munis)
- Ivalua vs QAD Adaptive ERP
- Ivalua vs Sage X3
- Ivalua vs SYSPRO
- Ivalua vs ADempiere
- Ivalua vs Apache OFBiz
- Ivalua vs Aptean
