Cybersecurity · head to head
Authy vs Cloud Native Buildpacks

Authy
Cybersecurity
Twilio's free authenticator app with encrypted cloud backup, mobile only since the desktop clients were withdrawn in 2024.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Cloud Native Buildpacks
Developer Tools
Specification and tooling that turns source code into OCI images without Dockerfiles
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Authy there is no export function for stored TOTP secrets, so moving to a different authenticator means disabling and re-enrolling two-factor authentication on every account individually, which is the reason most users stay rather than a reason anyone should choose it.; Cloud Native Buildpacks the operational cost is real: you own builder images, base image refresh cadence and migrations between specification versions, which currently sit at Buildpack API 0.10 and Platform API 0.12 with published migration guides, so breaking changes are a recurring chore.
- They diverge on capability: Authy covers Encrypted cloud backup, Cloud Native Buildpacks covers Detect and build lifecycle.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Authy and Cloud Native Buildpacks actually diverge.
| Attribute | Authy | Cloud Native Buildpacks |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | free | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Web | Linux, macOS, Windows, CLI, Docker, Kubernetes |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Authy
- Encrypted cloud backup
- Multi-device sync
- Standard TOTP
- Offline code generation
- App lock
- Multi-device toggle
- Token organisation
- Free with no account tier
Only in Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Detect and build lifecycle
- Image rebasing
- Reproducible layers
- Builder images
- Automatic SBOM output
- pack CLI
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Authy
- An individual who wants two-factor authentication on personal accounts and needs it to survive losing or replacing a phonenot Cloud Native Buildpacks
- A small team sharing access to a service account where the same tokens must be available on more than one handsetnot Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Replacing SMS-based codes with TOTP for someone who would abandon two-factor entirely if recovery were difficultnot Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Consolidating tokens scattered across several apps onto one device list with recognisable names and iconsnot Cloud Native Buildpacks
Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Patching a base image once and rebasing hundreds of application images rather than rebuilding and redeploying eachnot Authy
- Removing per-team Dockerfiles at an organisation where inconsistent base images have become an audit findingnot Authy
- Giving application teams a supported path to a hardened image without teaching every team container securitynot Authy
- Choosing a build system that a risk committee will accept because governance is vendor neutral rather than single vendornot Authy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Authy
- There is no export function for stored TOTP secrets, so moving to a different authenticator means disabling and re-enrolling two-factor authentication on every account individually, which is the reason most users stay rather than a reason anyone should choose it.
- The Windows, macOS and Linux desktop applications were discontinued in 2024 and stopped working, so any workflow that depended on copying codes on a computer now requires a phone in hand, and users who held tokens only on a desktop client had to restore from backup or re-enrol.
- The account is keyed to a phone number, so an attacker who takes over that number through a SIM swap can begin the device registration flow, and the only remaining control is the backup password that most users set once and cannot recall.
- In 2024 an unauthenticated Twilio endpoint allowed attackers to confirm which numbers from a supplied list were registered Authy accounts, exposing around 33 million phone numbers, which disclosed no codes but handed phishers a validated list of people known to use two-factor authentication.
- It is a free consumer application inside a company that has already retired the paid Authy developer API it once supported, so it carries no revenue of its own, and users should treat its continued existence as a business decision rather than a roadmap commitment.
Cloud Native Buildpacks
- The operational cost is real: you own builder images, base image refresh cadence and migrations between specification versions, which currently sit at Buildpack API 0.10 and Platform API 0.12 with published migration guides, so breaking changes are a recurring chore.
- A cold build with no warm cache is noticeably slower than a well layered Dockerfile, and because the cache lives in a cache image or volume, ephemeral continuous integration runners pay full price on every run unless you deliberately warm them.
- Reproducibility depends on discipline rather than defaults, because buildpacks resolve runtime patch versions at build time unless you pin them and stability is only as good as the builder image tag you point at.
- The specification is neutral but the buildpacks are not, and in practice you depend on Paketo, Heroku or Google, whose roadmaps, support levels and update cadences differ; CNCF also records contributing organisations down 12 per cent year on year.
- Native dependencies, unusual monorepo layouts and non-standard project structures push you into writing custom buildpacks or extensions, which is a genuine engineering investment and not a configuration change.
Pricing, plan by plan
Authy
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Authy review.
Cloud Native Buildpacks
Free- Cloud Native BuildpacksFree
- Apache-2.0, hosted by the CNCF
- No commercial edition from the project itself
- Commercial support only from vendors of specific buildpack distributions
Which should you pick?
Choose Authy if
- You need encrypted cloud backup.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want multi-device sync.
Choose Cloud Native Buildpacks if
- You need detect and build lifecycle.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, CLI, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want image rebasing.
Questions people ask
- Is Authy or Cloud Native Buildpacks better?
- Neither clearly leads. Authy starts at Free and Cloud Native Buildpacks at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Authy or Cloud Native Buildpacks?
- Authy starts at Free and Cloud Native Buildpacks at Free.
- Does Authy or Cloud Native Buildpacks run on more platforms?
- Authy runs on Web. Cloud Native Buildpacks runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, CLI, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Authy for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Authy best used for?
- Authy is most often used for an individual who wants two-factor authentication on personal accounts and needs it to survive losing or replacing a phone, a small team sharing access to a service account where the same tokens must be available on more than one handset, replacing sms-based codes with totp for someone who would abandon two-factor entirely if recovery were difficult, consolidating tokens scattered across several apps onto one device list with recognisable names and icons. Of those, an individual who wants two-factor authentication on personal accounts and needs it to survive losing or replacing a phone and a small team sharing access to a service account where the same tokens must be available on more than one handset are not what Cloud Native Buildpacks is typically brought in for.
- What can Authy do that Cloud Native Buildpacks cannot?
- Authy covers Encrypted cloud backup, Multi-device sync, Standard TOTP, Offline code generation. Cloud Native Buildpacks covers Detect and build lifecycle, Image rebasing, Reproducible layers, Builder images.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Authy: Is Authy still supported?
The mobile apps for iOS and Android are still available and functional. The desktop applications were withdrawn in 2024 and the Authy developer API has been retired in favour of Twilio Verify, so the surrounding product has been shrinking.
Cloud Native Buildpacks: What does CNCF graduation actually change?
Nothing technically, but it signals audited governance, security review and multi-vendor maintenance, which is usually what a procurement or risk team needs before approving a build system.
Authy: Can I export my tokens?
No. There is no export of the underlying secrets, by design. Migrating to another authenticator means going to each service, disabling two-factor authentication and setting it up again with the new app.
Cloud Native Buildpacks: How is this different from writing a Dockerfile?
Container build knowledge lives with the platform team in a builder image rather than in every repository, and rebasing lets you patch the runtime base of many images without rebuilding them.
Authy: What happened to the desktop app?
Twilio announced its discontinuation in March 2024 and the applications stopped working later that year. There is no replacement desktop client; the mobile apps are the product now.
Cloud Native Buildpacks: Does it cost anything?
No. The specification and tooling are Apache-2.0 and free. You pay only if you buy commercial support for a specific buildpack distribution from Broadcom, Heroku or Google.
Authy: Is multi-device sync safe to leave on?
It is the feature most worth understanding. Leaving new device registration enabled means anyone who controls your phone number can attempt to add a device. The usual advice is to turn the multi-device setting off once your devices are registered and turn it on only when you need to add one.
Cloud Native Buildpacks: Is it slower than a Dockerfile?
On a cold build with no cache, yes. Warm builds are competitive, but continuous integration runners that start empty every time will feel the difference.
Authy: What if I lose my phone and forget the backup password?
The secrets are encrypted with that password and Twilio does not hold it, so they cannot be recovered. You would fall back to each individual service's account recovery process, which is exactly the situation the backup was meant to avoid.
Related pages
More on Cloud Native Buildpacks
Other head to heads
- Authy vs LastPass
- Authy vs 1Password
- Authy vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Authy vs Norton 360
- Authy vs Google Authenticator
- Authy vs Cisco Duo
- Authy vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Authy vs RoboForm
- Authy vs ExpressVPN
- Authy vs Authelia
- Authy vs Stytch
- Authy vs WorkOS
- Authy vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Authy vs Sticky Password
- Authy vs Surfshark
- Authy vs Tanium
- Authy vs Teleport
- Authy vs Earthly
- Authy vs Nixpacks
- Authy vs Tilt
- Authy vs Dagger
- Authy vs Atlantis
- Authy vs Webpack
- Authy vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Authy vs Vite
- Authy vs Depot
- Authy vs Moonrepo
- Authy vs Nx Cloud
- Authy vs Swagger UI
- Authy vs Prettier
- Authy vs StackBlitz
- Authy vs Steampipe
- Authy vs WarpBuild
- Cloud Native Buildpacks vs LastPass
- Cloud Native Buildpacks vs 1Password
- Cloud Native Buildpacks vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Cloud Native Buildpacks vs Norton 360
- Cloud Native Buildpacks vs Google Authenticator
- Cloud Native Buildpacks vs Cisco Duo
- Cloud Native Buildpacks vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Cloud Native Buildpacks vs RoboForm
- Cloud Native Buildpacks vs ExpressVPN
- Cloud Native Buildpacks vs Authelia
- Cloud Native Buildpacks vs Stytch
- Cloud Native Buildpacks vs WorkOS
- Cloud Native Buildpacks vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Cloud Native Buildpacks vs Sticky Password
- Cloud Native Buildpacks vs Surfshark
- Cloud Native Buildpacks vs Tanium
- Cloud Native Buildpacks vs Teleport
- Cloud Native Buildpacks vs Earthly
- Cloud Native Buildpacks vs Nixpacks
- Cloud Native Buildpacks vs Tilt
- Cloud Native Buildpacks vs Dagger
- Cloud Native Buildpacks vs Atlantis
- Cloud Native Buildpacks vs Webpack
- Cloud Native Buildpacks vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Cloud Native Buildpacks vs Vite
- Cloud Native Buildpacks vs Depot
- Cloud Native Buildpacks vs Moonrepo
- Cloud Native Buildpacks vs Nx Cloud
- Cloud Native Buildpacks vs Swagger UI
- Cloud Native Buildpacks vs Prettier
- Cloud Native Buildpacks vs StackBlitz
- Cloud Native Buildpacks vs Steampipe
- Cloud Native Buildpacks vs WarpBuild
