Softwr

Weather & Environment · head to head

Atmotube vs Climate FieldView

Atmotube logo

Atmotube

Weather & Environment

Portable air quality monitor for on-the-go tracking

From
$179/one-time
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Climate FieldView logo

Climate FieldView

Weather & Environment

Digital agriculture platform for data-driven farming

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Only Climate FieldView has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Atmotube a hardware purchase: the readings come from the Atmotube PRO 2 or Atmocube device rather than from the app alone; Climate FieldView the Plus plan starts at $649 per year and is billed annually
  • They diverge on capability: Atmotube covers Portable design, Climate FieldView covers Real-time data collection.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Atmotube and Climate FieldView actually diverge.

Attributes where Atmotube and Climate FieldView differ
AttributeAtmotubeClimate FieldView
Starting price$179/one-timeFree
Pricing modelone-timesubscription
Free tierNoYes
PlatformsIos, Android, HardwareWeb, Ios, Android, Api
CategoryUnknownWeather & Environment
Founded20152006

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Atmotube

  • Portable design
  • PM1/2.5/10 sensors
  • VOC detection
  • Temperature/humidity
  • GPS tracking
  • Mobile app
  • PlanetWatch
  • Data export

Only in Climate FieldView

  • Real-time data collection
  • Field health imagery
  • Yield analysis
  • Variable rate seeding
  • Nitrogen management
  • Equipment connectivity
  • Manual scouting tools
  • Data sharing & connectivity

Both cover

  • Ios support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Atmotube

  • Personal exposure tracking for PM1, PM2.5 and PM10 while moving aroundnot Climate FieldView
  • Indoor air quality monitoring for CO2 and VOCsnot Climate FieldView
  • Commercial building air quality dashboards with Atmocubenot Climate FieldView
  • Noise and light monitoring alongside air quality in officesnot Climate FieldView

Climate FieldView

  • Collecting and visualising planting, yield and application data from farm machinerynot Atmotube
  • Building variable rate seeding prescriptionsnot Atmotube
  • Field scouting with satellite imagery and field health mapsnot Atmotube

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Atmotube

  • A hardware purchase: the readings come from the Atmotube PRO 2 or Atmocube device rather than from the app alone
  • Prices are not shown on the main site and sit in a separate store
  • The two devices measure different things, with formaldehyde, light and noise on Atmocube only

Climate FieldView

  • The Plus plan starts at $649 per year and is billed annually
  • The free Basic plan lists only Online Support and a Data Inbox as its included features
  • Collecting in-cab data requires buying the FieldView Drive hardware separately
  • The vendor states the plan content is subject to change and will be updated regularly

Pricing, plan by plan

Atmotube

$179/one-time
  • Atmotube Pro$179/one-time
    • PM sensors
    • VOC detection
    • Bluetooth

Climate FieldView

Free
  • FieldView DriveFree
    • Data collection & storage
    • Basic field mapping
    • Equipment connectivity
  • FieldView Plus$4/acre/year
    • Everything in Drive
    • Field health imagery
    • Scouting with drop pins
  • FieldView Pro$10/acre/year
    • Everything in Plus
    • Seed scripting
    • Nitrogen advisor

Which should you pick?

Choose Atmotube if

  • You need portable design.
  • You work on Ios, Android, Hardware.
  • You also want pm1/2.5/10 sensors.
Atmotube review

Choose Climate FieldView if

  • You need real-time data collection.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
  • You also want field health imagery.
Climate FieldView review

Questions people ask

Is Atmotube or Climate FieldView better?
Neither clearly leads. Atmotube starts at $179/one-time and Climate FieldView at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Atmotube or Climate FieldView?
Climate FieldView has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $179/one-time for Atmotube and Free for Climate FieldView.
Does Atmotube or Climate FieldView run on more platforms?
Atmotube runs on Ios, Android, Hardware. Climate FieldView runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
Can I use Climate FieldView for free?
Yes. Climate FieldView has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Atmotube starts at $179/one-time.
What is Atmotube best used for?
Atmotube is most often used for personal exposure tracking for pm1, pm2.5 and pm10 while moving around, indoor air quality monitoring for co2 and vocs, commercial building air quality dashboards with atmocube, noise and light monitoring alongside air quality in offices. Of those, personal exposure tracking for pm1, pm2.5 and pm10 while moving around and indoor air quality monitoring for co2 and vocs are not what Climate FieldView is typically brought in for.
What can Atmotube do that Climate FieldView cannot?
Atmotube covers Portable design, PM1/2.5/10 sensors, VOC detection, Temperature/humidity. Climate FieldView covers Real-time data collection, Field health imagery, Yield analysis, Variable rate seeding. Both handle Ios support.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on Atmotube

More on Climate FieldView

Keep looking

Other head to heads