No-Code · head to head
Appian vs Backendless

Appian
No-Code
Low-code process automation platform priced per user, per app, per month, with tier limits on data and AI volume
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Backendless
APIs
Visual app development platform with REST APIs and cloud backend
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Backendless has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Appian cost multiplies on three axes at once, users, apps and month, so deploying several apps to overlapping user populations produces a bill that is not obvious from any single per-user headline figure.; Backendless free tier limited to 50 API requests per minute and 20 database tables
- They diverge on capability: Appian covers Low-code process designer, Backendless covers REST API.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Appian and Backendless actually diverge.
| Attribute | Appian | Backendless |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | Per user, per app, per month, escalating across Standard, Advanced and Premium tiers | Unknown |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Cloud, Visual builder |
| Category | No-Code | APIs |
| Founded | Unknown | 2012 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Appian
- Low-code process designer
- Robotic process automation
- AI process automation
- Data fabric
- Portals
- Process mining
Only in Backendless
- REST API
- Real-time database
- Cloud code
- Custom integrations
- Webhooks
- Cloud functions
- Cloud support
- Visual builder support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Appian
- A regulated enterprise (financial services, government, insurance) automating case management processes that need a full audit trailnot Backendless
- A company deploying RPA bots alongside low-code apps and wanting both in one licensed platformnot Backendless
- An organisation whose process data volume is large enough that the Standard tier's 4 million row cap is a real constraint worth planning fornot Backendless
- A business wanting embedded AI actions inside workflow steps rather than bolted on separatelynot Backendless
Backendless
- API Developmentnot Appian
- API Gatewaynot Appian
- API Testingnot Appian
- API Documentationnot Appian
- Microservicesnot Appian
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Appian
- Cost multiplies on three axes at once, users, apps and month, so deploying several apps to overlapping user populations produces a bill that is not obvious from any single per-user headline figure.
- Each tier has hard caps on data rows, RPA bots and monthly AI actions, so a workload can force a tier upgrade purely from data or automation volume growth, independent of user count.
- No dollar figures are published anywhere on Appian's own site; every real price point comes from a sales negotiation, making early-stage budget comparison against OutSystems or Mendix difficult.
- The platform's strength in process orchestration and case management is less useful for teams that mainly want simple departmental data apps, where the pricing and capability are overkill.
- Exceeding the 200,000 (Standard) or 1,000,000 (Premium) monthly AI action allowance requires a renegotiation, so AI-heavy workflows carry real usage risk beyond the base subscription.
Backendless
- Free tier limited to 50 API requests per minute and 20 database tables
- Smaller community and integration ecosystem compared to Firebase or AWS
- Customization beyond codeless tools requires developer expertise
- Limited documentation for advanced use cases and edge cases
Pricing, plan by plan
Appian
On request- Standard$undefined/month
- Per user, per app, per month
- 4 million data row capacity
- 5 RPA bots included
- Advanced$undefined/month
- Per user, per app, per month
- Higher data row capacity than Standard
- More RPA bots than Standard
- Premium$undefined/month
- Per user, per app, per month
- 50 million data row capacity
- Unlimited RPA bots
Backendless
Free- FreeFree
- 50 API requests/minute
- 20 database tables
- 1 GB file storage
- Scale Variable$15/month
- Unlimited API requests/month
- 100 database tables
- 10 GB file storage
- Scale Fixed$15/month
- Same as Scale Variable
- Fixed monthly pricing
Which should you pick?
Choose Appian if
- You need low-code process designer.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want robotic process automation.
Choose Backendless if
- You need rest api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Visual builder.
- You also want real-time database.
Questions people ask
- Is Appian or Backendless better?
- Neither clearly leads. Appian starts at On request and Backendless at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Appian or Backendless?
- Backendless has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Appian and Free for Backendless.
- Does Appian or Backendless run on more platforms?
- Appian runs on Web, iOS, Android. Backendless runs on Cloud, Visual builder.
- Can I use Backendless for free?
- Yes. Backendless has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Appian starts at On request.
- What is Appian best used for?
- Appian is most often used for a regulated enterprise (financial services, government, insurance) automating case management processes that need a full audit trail, a company deploying rpa bots alongside low-code apps and wanting both in one licensed platform, an organisation whose process data volume is large enough that the standard tier's 4 million row cap is a real constraint worth planning for, a business wanting embedded ai actions inside workflow steps rather than bolted on separately. Of those, a regulated enterprise (financial services, government, insurance) automating case management processes that need a full audit trail and a company deploying rpa bots alongside low-code apps and wanting both in one licensed platform are not what Backendless is typically brought in for.
- What can Appian do that Backendless cannot?
- Appian covers Low-code process designer, Robotic process automation, AI process automation, Data fabric. Backendless covers REST API, Real-time database, Cloud code, Custom integrations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Appian: Does Appian publish its prices?
No dollar figures are public. It discloses the pricing mechanism, per user per app per month across three tiers, but actual rates are negotiated.
Backendless: Does Backendless have a free tier?
Backendless Free plan ($0/month) includes 50 API requests per minute, 20 database tables, 1 GB file storage, 1 visualization, 2 security roles, and basic cloud code capabilities.
SourceAppian: What happens if we exceed the data row cap?
Exceeding a tier's data row, RPA bot or AI action cap requires upgrading to the next tier or negotiating an add-on, regardless of user count.
Backendless: What features does the Scale plan include?
Scale plan ($15+/month) provides unlimited API requests per month, 100 database tables, 10 GB file storage, 5 visualizations, 10 custom API keys, daily backups, free SSL certificates, and 1,000 real-time connections.
SourceAppian: Is Appian a general app builder like OutSystems?
It can build general apps but is oriented more toward process automation and case management, with RPA and AI embedded as core features.
Backendless: Can I add more storage or increase API limits?
Yes, Backendless offers Function Packs ranging from $5-$399/month to increase specific limits such as storage, API requests, or security features.
SourceBackendless: Does Backendless support offline functionality?
Backendless supports real-time sync and offline capabilities for mobile apps, allowing data to sync when connectivity is restored.
SourceBackendless: Is Backendless Pro available for self-hosting?
Yes, Backendless Pro Community Edition is available under free licensing for core functionality. Managed Backendless is a paid option for self-hosted deployments with request-based pricing.
SourceBackendless: What are Backendless's integration limitations?
While Backendless supports many integrations, it has a smaller integration library compared to competitors. Finding solutions to edge cases or complex setups may require more development effort.
SourceRelated pages
More on Backendless
Other head to heads
- Appian vs Mendix
- Appian vs OutSystems
- Appian vs Zoho Creator
- Appian vs Quickbase
- Appian vs Thunkable
- Appian vs Corteza
- Appian vs Pabbly Connect
- Appian vs Kintone
- Appian vs FlutterFlow
- Appian vs Caspio
- Appian vs Noloco
- Appian vs Directual
- Appian vs Superblocks
- Appian vs ToolJet
- Appian vs WeWeb
- Appian vs Whalesync
- Appian vs PocketBase
- Appian vs Appwrite
- Appian vs Hasura
- Appian vs Parse Server
- Appian vs Thunder Client
- Appian vs Janus Gateway
- Appian vs Marqeta
- Appian vs i2c
- Appian vs Strapi
- Appian vs Sanity
- Appian vs Increase
- Appian vs Flybits
- Appian vs Payload CMS
- Appian vs Portkey
- Appian vs Prisma
- Appian vs RapidAPI
- Appian vs REST Client VSCode
- Appian vs Rutter
- Backendless vs Mendix
- Backendless vs OutSystems
- Backendless vs Zoho Creator
- Backendless vs Quickbase
- Backendless vs Thunkable
- Backendless vs Corteza
- Backendless vs Pabbly Connect
- Backendless vs Kintone
- Backendless vs FlutterFlow
- Backendless vs Caspio
- Backendless vs Noloco
- Backendless vs Directual
- Backendless vs Superblocks
- Backendless vs ToolJet
- Backendless vs WeWeb
- Backendless vs Whalesync
- Backendless vs PocketBase
- Backendless vs Appwrite
- Backendless vs Hasura
- Backendless vs Parse Server
- Backendless vs Thunder Client
- Backendless vs Janus Gateway
- Backendless vs Marqeta
- Backendless vs i2c
- Backendless vs Strapi
- Backendless vs Sanity
- Backendless vs Increase
- Backendless vs Flybits
- Backendless vs Payload CMS
- Backendless vs Portkey
- Backendless vs Prisma
- Backendless vs RapidAPI
- Backendless vs REST Client VSCode
- Backendless vs Rutter
