Databases · head to head
Apache Solr vs SAS

Apache Solr
Databases
Enterprise search platform built on Apache Lucene
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Apache Solr xML-heavy configuration and a developer experience that feels dated beside newer engines; SAS sAS publishes no rate, no minimum and no named cost driver; the how to buy page offers only a customized price quote based on your requirements and deployment preferences
- They diverge on capability: Apache Solr covers Lucene-based indexing, SAS covers Statistical analysis.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apache Solr and SAS actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apache Solr | SAS |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | subscription |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted | Linux, Windows, Web |
| Category | Databases | Machine Learning |
| Founded | Unknown | 1976 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apache Solr
- Lucene-based indexing
- Faceted search
- SolrCloud
- Schema control
Only in SAS
- Statistical analysis
- Machine learning
- Forecasting
- Text analytics
- Optimization
- Python
- R
- Hadoop
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apache Solr
- Library, archive and catalogue search where faceting is centralnot SAS
- Long-lived enterprise deployments valuing stability over noveltynot SAS
- Search requiring precise, explicitly configured relevance tuningnot SAS
SAS
- Regulated statistical analysis and clinical reportingnot Apache Solr
- Enterprise data management, visualization and decisioning on one licensed platformnot Apache Solr
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apache Solr
- XML-heavy configuration and a developer experience that feels dated beside newer engines
- SolrCloud depends on ZooKeeper, adding a component Elasticsearch removed years ago
- Smaller mindshare now, so newer tutorials, hiring and integrations favour Elasticsearch
- Considerably heavier than a purpose-built application search engine
SAS
- SAS publishes no rate, no minimum and no named cost driver; the how to buy page offers only a customized price quote based on your requirements and deployment preferences
- Most new and existing customers are routed through authorized resellers rather than buying direct
- Cloud marketplace purchases require choosing between pay as you go and bring your own licence, each with different licensing terms
Pricing, plan by plan
Apache Solr
Free- Apache SolrFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
SAS
Free- SAS OnDemand for AcademicsFree
- Academic use
- Core SAS
- SAS ViyaFree
- Full platform
- Cloud-native
- AI/ML
Which should you pick?
Choose Apache Solr if
- You need lucene-based indexing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want faceted search.
Choose SAS if
- You need statistical analysis.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Web.
- You also want machine learning.
Questions people ask
- Is Apache Solr or SAS better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apache Solr starts at Free and SAS at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apache Solr or SAS?
- Apache Solr starts at Free and SAS at Free.
- Does Apache Solr or SAS run on more platforms?
- Apache Solr runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted. SAS runs on Linux, Windows, Web.
- Can I use Apache Solr for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Apache Solr best used for?
- Apache Solr is most often used for library, archive and catalogue search where faceting is central, long-lived enterprise deployments valuing stability over novelty, search requiring precise, explicitly configured relevance tuning. Of those, library, archive and catalogue search where faceting is central and long-lived enterprise deployments valuing stability over novelty are not what SAS is typically brought in for.
- What can Apache Solr do that SAS cannot?
- Apache Solr covers Lucene-based indexing, Faceted search, SolrCloud, Schema control. SAS covers Statistical analysis, Machine learning, Forecasting, Text analytics.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apache Solr: Is Apache Solr free?
Yes, open source under the Apache Software Foundation.
SAS: Does SAS offer a free trial?
Yes, SAS offers a free trial through a private trial environment for SAS Viya. Interested customers can request access by submitting a trial form on their website.
SourceApache Solr: Solr or Elasticsearch?
Both are built on Lucene. Elasticsearch has the larger ecosystem and a friendlier API; Solr is very mature and strong on faceted search, and remains common in library and catalogue systems.
SAS: How does SAS price its software?
SAS does not publish standard pricing on its website. Instead, it uses a custom enterprise sales model where customers can choose between paying as-you-go or purchasing SAS Viya Enterprise. Specific pricing must be requested directly from their sales team.
SourceApache Solr: Is Solr still maintained?
Yes, actively, as a top-level Apache project.
SAS: What are my pricing options?
SAS offers flexible purchasing models including pay-as-you-go and enterprise licensing options. The company states they can help you find the environment that fits your needs, but specific terms must be discussed with sales.
SourceSAS: How do I get a pricing quote?
You can request pricing through their website by using the quote request form, requesting a customized demo, or contacting their sales team directly.
SourceRelated pages
More on Apache Solr
Other head to heads
- Apache Solr vs Meilisearch
- Apache Solr vs OpenSearch
- Apache Solr vs Elasticsearch
- Apache Solr vs PostgreSQL
- Apache Solr vs Typesense
- Apache Solr vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Apache Solr vs Solace PubSub+
- Apache Solr vs RabbitMQ
- Apache Solr vs Couchbase
- Apache Solr vs MariaDB
- Apache Solr vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Apache Solr vs IBM Db2
- Apache Solr vs Marqo
- Apache Solr vs Nile
- Apache Solr vs Ninox
- Apache Solr vs Presto
- Apache Solr vs Privacera
- Apache Solr vs RavenDB
- Apache Solr vs Azure Machine Learning
- Apache Solr vs DataRobot
- Apache Solr vs AWS SageMaker
- Apache Solr vs Google Vertex AI
- Apache Solr vs IBM SPSS
- Apache Solr vs Databricks
- Apache Solr vs Palantir Foundry
- Apache Solr vs Alteryx
- Apache Solr vs Snowflake
- Apache Solr vs Stata
- Apache Solr vs MATLAB
- Apache Solr vs ClearML
- Apache Solr vs Cohere
- Apache Solr vs Dask
- Apache Solr vs Fal AI
- Apache Solr vs Groq
- Apache Solr vs BigQuery ML
- SAS vs Meilisearch
- SAS vs OpenSearch
- SAS vs Elasticsearch
- SAS vs PostgreSQL
- SAS vs Typesense
- SAS vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- SAS vs Solace PubSub+
- SAS vs RabbitMQ
- SAS vs Couchbase
- SAS vs MariaDB
- SAS vs Microsoft SQL Server
- SAS vs IBM Db2
- SAS vs Marqo
- SAS vs Nile
- SAS vs Ninox
- SAS vs Presto
- SAS vs Privacera
- SAS vs RavenDB
- SAS vs Azure Machine Learning
- SAS vs DataRobot
- SAS vs AWS SageMaker
- SAS vs Google Vertex AI
- SAS vs IBM SPSS
- SAS vs Databricks
- SAS vs Palantir Foundry
- SAS vs Alteryx
- SAS vs Snowflake
- SAS vs Stata
- SAS vs MATLAB
- SAS vs ClearML
- SAS vs Cohere
- SAS vs Dask
- SAS vs Fal AI
- SAS vs Groq
- SAS vs BigQuery ML

