Databases · head to head
Apache Solr vs QuestDB

Apache Solr
Databases
Enterprise search platform built on Apache Lucene
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

QuestDB
Databases
Fast open source time-series database for high throughput ingestion
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Apache Solr xML-heavy configuration and a developer experience that feels dated beside newer engines; QuestDB open-source edition lacks high-availability, distributed architecture, and enterprise security features
- They diverge on capability: Apache Solr covers Lucene-based indexing, QuestDB covers High Throughput Ingestion.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apache Solr and QuestDB actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apache Solr | QuestDB |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | open-source |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted | Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP) |
| Founded | Unknown | 2014 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apache Solr
- Lucene-based indexing
- Faceted search
- SolrCloud
- Schema control
Only in QuestDB
- High Throughput Ingestion
- SQL Support
- Time-series Optimization
- SIMD Vectorization
- Column-oriented Storage
- Built-in Web Console
- InfluxDB Line Protocol
- PostgreSQL
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apache Solr
- Library, archive and catalogue search where faceting is centralnot QuestDB
- Long-lived enterprise deployments valuing stability over noveltynot QuestDB
- Search requiring precise, explicitly configured relevance tuningnot QuestDB
QuestDB
- Time-series analytics ingesting up to 20M rows/second from IoT sensors or financial data feedsnot Apache Solr
- Real-time dashboarding with 32ms time-to-first-row latency for minute-level analyticsnot Apache Solr
- Applications requiring multi-tier storage (hot ingest, real-time SQL, cold Parquet archive)not Apache Solr
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apache Solr
- XML-heavy configuration and a developer experience that feels dated beside newer engines
- SolrCloud depends on ZooKeeper, adding a component Elasticsearch removed years ago
- Smaller mindshare now, so newer tutorials, hiring and integrations favour Elasticsearch
- Considerably heavier than a purpose-built application search engine
QuestDB
- Open-source edition lacks high-availability, distributed architecture, and enterprise security features
- Enterprise edition pricing not published; requires contacting sales for custom quote
- Ingestion limit of 20M rows/sec platform-dependent; may not scale to extreme throughput requirements
Pricing, plan by plan
Apache Solr
Free- Apache SolrFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
QuestDB
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the QuestDB review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Apache Solr if
- You need lucene-based indexing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want faceted search.
Choose QuestDB if
- You need high throughput ingestion.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP).
- You also want sql support.
Questions people ask
- Is Apache Solr or QuestDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apache Solr starts at Free and QuestDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apache Solr or QuestDB?
- Apache Solr starts at Free and QuestDB at Free.
- Does Apache Solr or QuestDB run on more platforms?
- Apache Solr runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted. QuestDB runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP).
- Can I use Apache Solr for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Apache Solr best used for?
- Apache Solr is most often used for library, archive and catalogue search where faceting is central, long-lived enterprise deployments valuing stability over novelty, search requiring precise, explicitly configured relevance tuning. Of those, library, archive and catalogue search where faceting is central and long-lived enterprise deployments valuing stability over novelty are not what QuestDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Apache Solr do that QuestDB cannot?
- Apache Solr covers Lucene-based indexing, Faceted search, SolrCloud, Schema control. QuestDB covers High Throughput Ingestion, SQL Support, Time-series Optimization, SIMD Vectorization.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apache Solr: Is Apache Solr free?
Yes, open source under the Apache Software Foundation.
QuestDB: How much does QuestDB Enterprise cost?
QuestDB does not publish specific pricing for the Enterprise tier. Customers must contact QuestDB via their enterprise contact form to receive a custom quote.
SourceApache Solr: Solr or Elasticsearch?
Both are built on Lucene. Elasticsearch has the larger ecosystem and a friendlier API; Solr is very mature and strong on faceted search, and remains common in library and catalogue systems.
QuestDB: Does QuestDB offer a free version?
Yes, QuestDB Open Source is completely free and recommended for evaluation, prototyping, and pilot projects. Enterprise features, high availability, security, and dedicated support require the paid Enterprise tier.
SourceApache Solr: Is Solr still maintained?
Yes, actively, as a top-level Apache project.
QuestDB: What deployment options does QuestDB offer?
QuestDB offers open source deployment, Enterprise deployment, and Bring Your Own Cloud (BYOC) deployment. Pricing details for BYOC and Enterprise tiers are not published and require direct contact with sales.
SourceRelated pages
More on Apache Solr
Other head to heads
- Apache Solr vs Meilisearch
- Apache Solr vs OpenSearch
- Apache Solr vs Elasticsearch
- Apache Solr vs PostgreSQL
- Apache Solr vs Typesense
- Apache Solr vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Apache Solr vs Solace PubSub+
- Apache Solr vs RabbitMQ
- Apache Solr vs Couchbase
- Apache Solr vs MariaDB
- Apache Solr vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Apache Solr vs IBM Db2
- Apache Solr vs Marqo
- Apache Solr vs Nile
- Apache Solr vs Ninox
- Apache Solr vs Presto
- Apache Solr vs Privacera
- Apache Solr vs RavenDB
- Apache Solr vs TimescaleDB
- Apache Solr vs Cockroach Labs
- Apache Solr vs Amazon Aurora
- Apache Solr vs Airtable
- Apache Solr vs Firebolt
- Apache Solr vs Apache Flink
- Apache Solr vs DuckDB
- Apache Solr vs ClickHouse
- Apache Solr vs NATS
- Apache Solr vs Canary Labs
- Apache Solr vs Chroma
- Apache Solr vs Cloudinary
- Apache Solr vs Convex
- Apache Solr vs Dgraph
- Apache Solr vs Dragonfly
- Apache Solr vs Apache Druid
- QuestDB vs Meilisearch
- QuestDB vs OpenSearch
- QuestDB vs Elasticsearch
- QuestDB vs PostgreSQL
- QuestDB vs Typesense
- QuestDB vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- QuestDB vs Solace PubSub+
- QuestDB vs RabbitMQ
- QuestDB vs Couchbase
- QuestDB vs MariaDB
- QuestDB vs Microsoft SQL Server
- QuestDB vs IBM Db2
- QuestDB vs Marqo
- QuestDB vs Nile
- QuestDB vs Ninox
- QuestDB vs Presto
- QuestDB vs Privacera
- QuestDB vs RavenDB
- QuestDB vs TimescaleDB
- QuestDB vs Cockroach Labs
- QuestDB vs Amazon Aurora
- QuestDB vs Airtable
- QuestDB vs Firebolt
- QuestDB vs Apache Flink
- QuestDB vs DuckDB
- QuestDB vs ClickHouse
- QuestDB vs NATS
- QuestDB vs Canary Labs
- QuestDB vs Chroma
- QuestDB vs Cloudinary
- QuestDB vs Convex
- QuestDB vs Dgraph
- QuestDB vs Dragonfly
- QuestDB vs Apache Druid
