Databases · head to head
Apache Solr vs OpenLink Endur

Apache Solr
Databases
Enterprise search platform built on Apache Lucene
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Apache Solr has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Apache Solr xML-heavy configuration and a developer experience that feels dated beside newer engines; OpenLink Endur no pricing published on vendor website; enterprise product requires direct contact with ION Group sales
- They diverge on capability: Apache Solr covers Lucene-based indexing, OpenLink Endur covers Deal capture.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apache Solr and OpenLink Endur actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apache Solr | OpenLink Endur |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted | Desktop, Web, Api |
| Category | Databases | Energy |
| Founded | Unknown | 1999 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apache Solr
- Lucene-based indexing
- Faceted search
- SolrCloud
- Schema control
Only in OpenLink Endur
- Deal capture
- Position management
- Risk analytics
- Credit management
- Logistics
- Settlement
- Accounting integration
- Regulatory compliance
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apache Solr
- Library, archive and catalogue search where faceting is centralnot OpenLink Endur
- Long-lived enterprise deployments valuing stability over noveltynot OpenLink Endur
- Search requiring precise, explicitly configured relevance tuningnot OpenLink Endur
OpenLink Endur
- Energy tradingnot Apache Solr
- Risk managementnot Apache Solr
- Commodity logisticsnot Apache Solr
- Regulatory compliancenot Apache Solr
- Settlementnot Apache Solr
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apache Solr
- XML-heavy configuration and a developer experience that feels dated beside newer engines
- SolrCloud depends on ZooKeeper, adding a component Elasticsearch removed years ago
- Smaller mindshare now, so newer tutorials, hiring and integrations favour Elasticsearch
- Considerably heavier than a purpose-built application search engine
OpenLink Endur
- No pricing published on vendor website; enterprise product requires direct contact with ION Group sales
Pricing, plan by plan
Apache Solr
Free- Apache SolrFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
OpenLink Endur
On request- Trading$undefined/custom
- Deal capture
- Position management
- P&L analytics
- Risk$undefined/custom
- VaR and PaR
- Credit risk
- Limit monitoring
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Full ETRM suite
- Multi-commodity
- Global support
Which should you pick?
Choose Apache Solr if
- You need lucene-based indexing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want faceted search.
Choose OpenLink Endur if
- You need deal capture.
- You work on Desktop, Web, Api.
- You also want position management.
Questions people ask
- Is Apache Solr or OpenLink Endur better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apache Solr starts at Free and OpenLink Endur at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apache Solr or OpenLink Endur?
- Apache Solr has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Apache Solr and On request for OpenLink Endur.
- Does Apache Solr or OpenLink Endur run on more platforms?
- Apache Solr runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted. OpenLink Endur runs on Desktop, Web, Api.
- Can I use Apache Solr for free?
- Yes. Apache Solr has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. OpenLink Endur starts at On request.
- What is Apache Solr best used for?
- Apache Solr is most often used for library, archive and catalogue search where faceting is central, long-lived enterprise deployments valuing stability over novelty, search requiring precise, explicitly configured relevance tuning. Of those, library, archive and catalogue search where faceting is central and long-lived enterprise deployments valuing stability over novelty are not what OpenLink Endur is typically brought in for.
- What can Apache Solr do that OpenLink Endur cannot?
- Apache Solr covers Lucene-based indexing, Faceted search, SolrCloud, Schema control. OpenLink Endur covers Deal capture, Position management, Risk analytics, Credit management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apache Solr: Is Apache Solr free?
Yes, open source under the Apache Software Foundation.
OpenLink Endur: How much does OpenLink Endur cost?
OpenLink Endur does not publish pricing on the ION Group website. This is an enterprise product requiring direct contact with ION Group sales for custom pricing.
SourceApache Solr: Solr or Elasticsearch?
Both are built on Lucene. Elasticsearch has the larger ecosystem and a friendlier API; Solr is very mature and strong on faceted search, and remains common in library and catalogue systems.
OpenLink Endur: How can I get pricing for OpenLink Endur?
Contact ION Group directly through their contact forms, request a demo, or work with their sales team to receive a custom quote for OpenLink Endur.
SourceApache Solr: Is Solr still maintained?
Yes, actively, as a top-level Apache project.
Related pages
More on Apache Solr
More on OpenLink Endur
Other head to heads
- Apache Solr vs Meilisearch
- Apache Solr vs OpenSearch
- Apache Solr vs Elasticsearch
- Apache Solr vs PostgreSQL
- Apache Solr vs Typesense
- Apache Solr vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Apache Solr vs Solace PubSub+
- Apache Solr vs RabbitMQ
- Apache Solr vs Couchbase
- Apache Solr vs MariaDB
- Apache Solr vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Apache Solr vs IBM Db2
- Apache Solr vs Marqo
- Apache Solr vs Nile
- Apache Solr vs Ninox
- Apache Solr vs Presto
- Apache Solr vs Privacera
- Apache Solr vs RavenDB
- Apache Solr vs Enphase Enlighten
- Apache Solr vs ABB Ability
- Apache Solr vs Aurora Solar
- Apache Solr vs Quorum CTRM
- Apache Solr vs EnergyCAP
- Apache Solr vs Petrel E&P Software
- Apache Solr vs SAP for Utilities
- Apache Solr vs AVEVA PI System
- Apache Solr vs Schneider Electric EcoStruxure
- Apache Solr vs Oracle Utilities
- Apache Solr vs Enerex
- Apache Solr vs GE Digital GridOS
- Apache Solr vs Clean Power Research PowerClerk
- Apache Solr vs Cutsforth InsightCM
- Apache Solr vs PowerFactory DIgSILENT
- Apache Solr vs Emerson Ovation
- OpenLink Endur vs Meilisearch
- OpenLink Endur vs OpenSearch
- OpenLink Endur vs Elasticsearch
- OpenLink Endur vs PostgreSQL
- OpenLink Endur vs Typesense
- OpenLink Endur vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- OpenLink Endur vs Solace PubSub+
- OpenLink Endur vs RabbitMQ
- OpenLink Endur vs Couchbase
- OpenLink Endur vs MariaDB
- OpenLink Endur vs Microsoft SQL Server
- OpenLink Endur vs IBM Db2
- OpenLink Endur vs Marqo
- OpenLink Endur vs Nile
- OpenLink Endur vs Ninox
- OpenLink Endur vs Presto
- OpenLink Endur vs Privacera
- OpenLink Endur vs RavenDB
- OpenLink Endur vs Enphase Enlighten
- OpenLink Endur vs ABB Ability
- OpenLink Endur vs Aurora Solar
- OpenLink Endur vs Quorum CTRM
- OpenLink Endur vs EnergyCAP
- OpenLink Endur vs Petrel E&P Software
- OpenLink Endur vs SAP for Utilities
- OpenLink Endur vs AVEVA PI System
- OpenLink Endur vs Schneider Electric EcoStruxure
- OpenLink Endur vs Oracle Utilities
- OpenLink Endur vs Enerex
- OpenLink Endur vs GE Digital GridOS
- OpenLink Endur vs Clean Power Research PowerClerk
- OpenLink Endur vs Cutsforth InsightCM
- OpenLink Endur vs PowerFactory DIgSILENT
- OpenLink Endur vs Emerson Ovation

