Cybersecurity · head to head
Aikido vs Netwrix

Aikido
Cybersecurity
Unified security platform automating vulnerability detection and fixing across development
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Netwrix
Cybersecurity
Data access governance and change auditing across Active Directory, file shares and Microsoft 365
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Aikido has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Aikido free plan includes fair-usage limits on repos and container images; Netwrix the portfolio is assembled from acquisitions, so consoles, agents and licensing metrics differ between products and the platform story is ahead of the engineering reality.
- They diverge on capability: Aikido covers Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Netwrix covers Change auditing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Aikido and Netwrix actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Aikido
- Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
- Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
- AutoFix
- Secrets detection
- Cloud Security Posture Management
- AI-powered penetration testing
- Device protection
- False positive reduction
Only in Netwrix
- Change auditing
- Effective permissions
- Data classification
- Access remediation
- Threat detection
- Group policy management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Aikido
- Developer-friendly security integrated into PR workflowsnot Netwrix
- Automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alertsnot Netwrix
- Consolidation of fragmented security tools across development lifecyclenot Netwrix
- Cloud infrastructure security posture monitoringnot Netwrix
- Supply chain attack prevention and malware detectionnot Netwrix
Netwrix
- An organisation that cannot tell an auditor who has access to a sensitive file share and needs an answer with evidencenot Aikido
- A security team reducing ransomware blast radius by removing Everyone and Domain Users permissions from sensitive datanot Aikido
- An IT team investigating an unexplained Active Directory change and needing the exact account, time and previous valuenot Aikido
- A company responding to GDPR data subject access requests that must first locate personal data scattered across legacy sharesnot Aikido
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Aikido
- Free plan includes fair-usage limits on repos and container images
- Pricing increases significantly with user and repository scale
- Advanced features like penetration testing and VM scanning limited to higher tiers
- Device protection limited to Development environments only
- Requires multiple plan tiers for full platform coverage
Netwrix
- The portfolio is assembled from acquisitions, so consoles, agents and licensing metrics differ between products and the platform story is ahead of the engineering reality.
- Licensing metrics vary by product, per enabled user for some and per managed asset for others, which makes assembling a multi-product quote unusually difficult to compare against a single-vendor competitor.
- Auditing agents and collectors add load to domain controllers and file servers, and large estates need careful sizing to avoid degrading the systems being monitored.
- It reports and remediates but does not enforce access decisions at request time, so it complements rather than replaces identity governance and buyers still need an IGA tool for certification workflows.
- Coverage is strongest on Microsoft estates; Linux, NAS appliances and non-Microsoft SaaS are supported unevenly and often need additional modules or trail behind on feature parity.
Pricing, plan by plan
Aikido
Free- DeveloperFree
- Up to 2 users
- Dependency scanning (SCA)
- SAST and AI SAST
- Pro$600/month
- Up to 10 users
- All Basic features
- On-premise scanning
- Advanced$600/month
- Up to 10 users
- All Pro features
- Broker for internal apps
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Custom pricing for tailored modules
- Dedicated account management
- Custom SLAs
Netwrix
On request- Netwrix Platform$undefined/year
- Priced per enabled user or per managed asset depending on the product
- Auditing, data classification, privileged access and threat products licensed separately
- Netwrix 1Secure SaaS console with a 14-day free trial
Which should you pick?
Choose Aikido if
- You need static application security testing (sast).
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CI/CD, IDE.
- You also want software composition analysis (sca).
Choose Netwrix if
- You need change auditing.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want effective permissions.
Questions people ask
- Is Aikido or Netwrix better?
- Neither clearly leads. Aikido starts at Free and Netwrix at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Aikido or Netwrix?
- Aikido has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Aikido and On request for Netwrix.
- Does Aikido or Netwrix run on more platforms?
- Aikido runs on Web, CI/CD, IDE. Netwrix runs on Windows, Web.
- Can I use Aikido for free?
- Yes. Aikido has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Netwrix starts at On request.
- What is Aikido best used for?
- Aikido is most often used for developer-friendly security integrated into pr workflows, automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alerts, consolidation of fragmented security tools across development lifecycle, cloud infrastructure security posture monitoring. Of those, developer-friendly security integrated into pr workflows and automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alerts are not what Netwrix is typically brought in for.
- What can Aikido do that Netwrix cannot?
- Aikido covers Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Software Composition Analysis (SCA), AutoFix, Secrets detection. Netwrix covers Change auditing, Effective permissions, Data classification, Access remediation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Aikido: What is included in Aikido's free Developer plan?
The free Developer plan includes up to 2 users with SAST, SCA, secrets detection, cloud scanning, and license risk detection. Fair-usage limits apply: 10 repos, 2 container images, 1 domain, and 1 cloud account.
SourceNetwrix: Does it replace identity governance?
No. It shows you who has access and lets you fix it, but recertification campaigns and access request workflow are an IGA product.
Aikido: What is AutoFix and how does it work?
AutoFix is Aikido's automated vulnerability remediation feature that identifies vulnerabilities and suggests or applies specific code fixes automatically, reducing manual remediation effort.
SourceNetwrix: Is there a SaaS option?
Netwrix 1Secure is the cloud console covering data and identity visibility, with a 14-day free trial including full access.
Aikido: How many false positives does Aikido reduce?
Aikido reduces false positives by 99%, using AI-powered context awareness to filter noise and focus on vulnerabilities that present real business risk.
SourceNetwrix: How is it priced?
Per enabled user or per managed asset depending on the product, quoted rather than published. Assume separate line items per module.
Aikido: What integrations does Aikido support?
Aikido integrates with Jira, Linear, Slack, Teams, GitHub, GitLab, and other popular development tools to fit into existing workflows.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Aikido vs Snyk
- Aikido vs Veracode
- Aikido vs Tenable
- Aikido vs Legit Security
- Aikido vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Aikido vs Qualys VMDR
- Aikido vs Arnica
- Aikido vs Sysdig
- Aikido vs Akeyless
- Aikido vs Infisical
- Aikido vs Tanium
- Aikido vs Doppler
- Aikido vs Passbolt
- Aikido vs Ping Identity
- Aikido vs Proofpoint
- Aikido vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Aikido vs Recorded Future
- Aikido vs Omada Identity
- Aikido vs One Identity
- Aikido vs Securiti
- Aikido vs Saviynt
- Aikido vs Speakeasy
- Aikido vs BigID
- Aikido vs Fenergo
- Aikido vs Mimecast
- Aikido vs Chainguard
- Aikido vs Envysion
- Aikido vs Feedzai
- Aikido vs Frontegg
- Aikido vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Netwrix vs Snyk
- Netwrix vs Veracode
- Netwrix vs Tenable
- Netwrix vs Legit Security
- Netwrix vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Netwrix vs Qualys VMDR
- Netwrix vs Arnica
- Netwrix vs Sysdig
- Netwrix vs Akeyless
- Netwrix vs Infisical
- Netwrix vs Tanium
- Netwrix vs Doppler
- Netwrix vs Passbolt
- Netwrix vs Ping Identity
- Netwrix vs Proofpoint
- Netwrix vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Netwrix vs Recorded Future
- Netwrix vs Omada Identity
- Netwrix vs One Identity
- Netwrix vs Securiti
- Netwrix vs Saviynt
- Netwrix vs Speakeasy
- Netwrix vs BigID
- Netwrix vs Fenergo
- Netwrix vs Mimecast
- Netwrix vs Chainguard
- Netwrix vs Envysion
- Netwrix vs Feedzai
- Netwrix vs Frontegg
- Netwrix vs HashiCorp Boundary
