Cybersecurity · head to head
Aikido vs Jitsu

Aikido
Cybersecurity
Unified security platform automating vulnerability detection and fixing across development
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Jitsu
Developer Tools
Open source event pipeline that streams behavioural data to your own warehouse
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Aikido free plan includes fair-usage limits on repos and container images; Jitsu jitsu is a pipeline, not a customer data platform, so identity resolution, audience building and reverse ETL are absent and a marketing team expecting Segment parity will be disappointed.
- They diverge on capability: Aikido covers Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Jitsu covers Event collection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Aikido and Jitsu actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Aikido
- Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
- Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
- AutoFix
- Secrets detection
- Cloud Security Posture Management
- AI-powered penetration testing
- Device protection
- False positive reduction
Only in Jitsu
- Event collection
- Warehouse destinations
- Connector syncs
- Transformations
- Bundled ClickHouse
- Event debugger
- Self-hosting
- Custom domains
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Aikido
- Developer-friendly security integrated into PR workflowsnot Jitsu
- Automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alertsnot Jitsu
- Consolidation of fragmented security tools across development lifecyclenot Jitsu
- Cloud infrastructure security posture monitoringnot Jitsu
- Supply chain attack prevention and malware detectionnot Jitsu
Jitsu
- A team paying five figures a year to a customer data platform when all it actually does is send events to Snowflakenot Aikido
- An engineering group that needs event collection running inside its own VPC for data residency or security review reasonsnot Aikido
- A product analytics setup that wants raw events in the warehouse as the source of truth rather than trapped in a vendor toolnot Aikido
- A startup that needs first-party event collection on its own domain to reduce loss from tracker blocking without paying CDP pricesnot Aikido
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Aikido
- Free plan includes fair-usage limits on repos and container images
- Pricing increases significantly with user and repository scale
- Advanced features like penetration testing and VM scanning limited to higher tiers
- Device protection limited to Development environments only
- Requires multiple plan tiers for full platform coverage
Jitsu
- Jitsu is a pipeline, not a customer data platform, so identity resolution, audience building and reverse ETL are absent and a marketing team expecting Segment parity will be disappointed.
- Connector sync frequency is deliberately tiered, with the free plan limited to manual runs and one daily sync, so anything approaching operational freshness requires the paid plan or self-hosting.
- Self-hosting means you own the reliability of a system that drops data silently when misconfigured, and event loss is uniquely hard to notice because nothing errors, the numbers are just quietly lower.
- The connector catalogue is far smaller than Fivetran or Airbyte, so if your requirement is pulling from many SaaS sources rather than pushing events, Jitsu is the wrong half of the problem.
- It is a small company with a small commercial team, so enterprise procurement processes around security review, contractual SLAs and support escalation take longer than with an incumbent vendor.
Pricing, plan by plan
Aikido
Free- DeveloperFree
- Up to 2 users
- Dependency scanning (SCA)
- SAST and AI SAST
- Pro$600/month
- Up to 10 users
- All Basic features
- On-premise scanning
- Advanced$600/month
- Up to 10 users
- All Pro features
- Broker for internal apps
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Custom pricing for tailored modules
- Dedicated account management
- Custom SLAs
Jitsu
Free- Open SourceFree
- MIT licence
- Self-host on any cloud
- No usage limits
- Cloud FreeFree
- Unlimited captured events
- 200,000 active events per month
- Manual connector runs only
- Business$99/month
- 2,000,000 active events per month
- $40 per additional million events
- Hourly connector sync frequency
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom event volume
- One minute sync frequency
- Unlimited active syncs
Which should you pick?
Choose Aikido if
- You need static application security testing (sast).
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CI/CD, IDE.
- You also want software composition analysis (sca).
Choose Jitsu if
- You need event collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, iOS, Android.
- You also want warehouse destinations.
Questions people ask
- Is Aikido or Jitsu better?
- Neither clearly leads. Aikido starts at Free and Jitsu at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Aikido or Jitsu?
- Aikido starts at Free and Jitsu at Free.
- Does Aikido or Jitsu run on more platforms?
- Aikido runs on Web, CI/CD, IDE. Jitsu runs on Web, Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Aikido for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Aikido best used for?
- Aikido is most often used for developer-friendly security integrated into pr workflows, automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alerts, consolidation of fragmented security tools across development lifecycle, cloud infrastructure security posture monitoring. Of those, developer-friendly security integrated into pr workflows and automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alerts are not what Jitsu is typically brought in for.
- What can Aikido do that Jitsu cannot?
- Aikido covers Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Software Composition Analysis (SCA), AutoFix, Secrets detection. Jitsu covers Event collection, Warehouse destinations, Connector syncs, Transformations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Aikido: What is included in Aikido's free Developer plan?
The free Developer plan includes up to 2 users with SAST, SCA, secrets detection, cloud scanning, and license risk detection. Fair-usage limits apply: 10 repos, 2 container images, 1 domain, and 1 cloud account.
SourceJitsu: Is Jitsu the same as Jitsi?
No. Jitsu is an open source event data pipeline. Jitsi is an unrelated video conferencing project.
Aikido: What is AutoFix and how does it work?
AutoFix is Aikido's automated vulnerability remediation feature that identifies vulnerabilities and suggests or applies specific code fixes automatically, reducing manual remediation effort.
SourceJitsu: Can I self-host for free?
Yes. The project is MIT licensed with no usage limits when self-hosted.
Aikido: How many false positives does Aikido reduce?
Aikido reduces false positives by 99%, using AI-powered context awareness to filter noise and focus on vulnerabilities that present real business risk.
SourceJitsu: How does the cost compare with Segment?
The Business plan is 99 US dollars a month for two million active events, where a per-tracked-user CDP typically costs orders of magnitude more at comparable volume.
Aikido: What integrations does Aikido support?
Aikido integrates with Jira, Linear, Slack, Teams, GitHub, GitLab, and other popular development tools to fit into existing workflows.
SourceJitsu: Does Jitsu do identity resolution?
No. It transports and transforms events; identity stitching and audiences are not part of the product.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Aikido vs Snyk
- Aikido vs Veracode
- Aikido vs Tenable
- Aikido vs Legit Security
- Aikido vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Aikido vs Qualys VMDR
- Aikido vs Arnica
- Aikido vs Sysdig
- Aikido vs Akeyless
- Aikido vs Infisical
- Aikido vs Tanium
- Aikido vs Doppler
- Aikido vs Passbolt
- Aikido vs Ping Identity
- Aikido vs Proofpoint
- Aikido vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Aikido vs Recorded Future
- Aikido vs Atlantis
- Aikido vs Tilt
- Aikido vs Visual Studio Code
- Aikido vs Penpot
- Aikido vs Bazel
- Aikido vs Eclipse IDE
- Aikido vs Pants Build
- Aikido vs Ansible
- Aikido vs Helix
- Aikido vs Notepad++
- Aikido vs Steampipe
- Aikido vs Backstage
- Aikido vs Blacksmith
- Aikido vs Coder
- Aikido vs Garden
- Aikido vs GitLab CI/CD
- Aikido vs HCP Terraform
- Jitsu vs Snyk
- Jitsu vs Veracode
- Jitsu vs Tenable
- Jitsu vs Legit Security
- Jitsu vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Jitsu vs Qualys VMDR
- Jitsu vs Arnica
- Jitsu vs Sysdig
- Jitsu vs Akeyless
- Jitsu vs Infisical
- Jitsu vs Tanium
- Jitsu vs Doppler
- Jitsu vs Passbolt
- Jitsu vs Ping Identity
- Jitsu vs Proofpoint
- Jitsu vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Jitsu vs Recorded Future
- Jitsu vs Atlantis
- Jitsu vs Tilt
- Jitsu vs Visual Studio Code
- Jitsu vs Penpot
- Jitsu vs Bazel
- Jitsu vs Eclipse IDE
- Jitsu vs Pants Build
- Jitsu vs Ansible
- Jitsu vs Helix
- Jitsu vs Notepad++
- Jitsu vs Steampipe
- Jitsu vs Backstage
- Jitsu vs Blacksmith
- Jitsu vs Coder
- Jitsu vs Garden
- Jitsu vs GitLab CI/CD
- Jitsu vs HCP Terraform
