Mining · head to head
3DEC vs Tinkercad

Tinkercad
CAD
Free browser-based 3D design, electronics, and coding tool by Autodesk
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Tinkercad has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: 3DEC pricing is not published; licences are quoted, with subscription and perpetual options; Tinkercad limited to simple block-based modeling, unsuitable for complex or precise mechanical CAD work.
- They diverge on capability: 3DEC covers 3D distinct element analysis, Tinkercad covers Block-Based 3D Modeling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which 3DEC and Tinkercad actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in 3DEC
- 3D distinct element analysis
- Block motion tracking
- Contact detection
- Support design
- Dynamic simulation
- FLAC3D
- Leapfrog
- Vulcan
Only in Tinkercad
- Block-Based 3D Modeling
- Circuit Simulator
- Codeblocks Programming
- 3D Printing Export
- Classroom Management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
3DEC
- Three-dimensional analysis of jointed rock and discontinuous materialsnot Tinkercad
- Slope stability and pillar analysis for miningnot Tinkercad
- Blast and earthquake dynamic analysisnot Tinkercad
- Groundwater flow through fractured rocknot Tinkercad
- Coupled thermal, mechanical and hydraulic modelling for geothermal, CO2 sequestration and nuclear wastenot Tinkercad
Tinkercad
- Teaching introductory 3D design in classroomsnot 3DEC
- Simulating basic electronic circuitsnot 3DEC
- Designing simple objects for 3D printingnot 3DEC
- Introducing kids to block-based codingnot 3DEC
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
3DEC
- Pricing is not published; licences are quoted, with subscription and perpetual options
- A specialist geomechanical tool rather than general purpose simulation, so it assumes the user is a rock mechanics engineer
Tinkercad
- Limited to simple block-based modeling, unsuitable for complex or precise mechanical CAD work.
- Lacks advanced surfacing, parametric assembly, and simulation tools found in professional CAD software like Fusion 360.
- Requires an internet connection since it runs entirely in the browser with no offline desktop app.
- Export and rendering options are basic compared to dedicated 3D modeling or CAD applications.
Pricing, plan by plan
3DEC
On request- 3DEC Professional$25000/year
- 3D distinct element analysis
- Block-to-block interaction
- Support installation modeling
Tinkercad
Free- Free$undefined/mo
- 3D design
- Circuits simulation
- Codeblocks
Which should you pick?
Choose 3DEC if
- You need 3d distinct element analysis.
- You work on Windows, Linux.
- You also want block motion tracking.
Choose Tinkercad if
- You need block-based 3d modeling.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web.
- You also want circuit simulator.
Questions people ask
- Is 3DEC or Tinkercad better?
- Neither clearly leads. 3DEC starts at On request and Tinkercad at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, 3DEC or Tinkercad?
- Tinkercad has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for 3DEC and Free for Tinkercad.
- Does 3DEC or Tinkercad run on more platforms?
- 3DEC runs on Windows, Linux. Tinkercad runs on web.
- Can I use Tinkercad for free?
- Yes. Tinkercad has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. 3DEC starts at On request.
- What is 3DEC best used for?
- 3DEC is most often used for three-dimensional analysis of jointed rock and discontinuous materials, slope stability and pillar analysis for mining, blast and earthquake dynamic analysis, groundwater flow through fractured rock. Of those, three-dimensional analysis of jointed rock and discontinuous materials and slope stability and pillar analysis for mining are not what Tinkercad is typically brought in for.
- What can 3DEC do that Tinkercad cannot?
- 3DEC covers 3D distinct element analysis, Block motion tracking, Contact detection, Support design. Tinkercad covers Block-Based 3D Modeling, Circuit Simulator, Codeblocks Programming, 3D Printing Export.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
3DEC: Does 3DEC offer a free trial before purchasing?
Yes, 3DEC provides a free demo download available via the REQUEST DEMO button on their website. However, the specific trial period length is not stated on the product page.
Source3DEC: What licensing models does 3DEC support?
3DEC offers both subscription-based licenses (annual) and perpetual licenses. Subscription licenses are available through their FastSpring store with annual subscription terms.
Source3DEC: How is 3DEC pricing determined?
3DEC uses a quote-based pricing model rather than publishing fixed rates. Customers can request a quote through the website or purchase through their software store, with pricing customized based on specific needs.
Source3DEC: What support resources are included with 3DEC?
3DEC includes documentation, tutorials, forum access, FAQs, applied examples, and training courses. Support appears to be included with purchases rather than sold separately.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- 3DEC vs Deswik Suite
- 3DEC vs Leapfrog Geo
- 3DEC vs Caterpillar MineStar
- 3DEC vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- 3DEC vs OptiMine
- 3DEC vs Maptek I-Site
- 3DEC vs Leica Geosystems Mining
- 3DEC vs PLAXIS
- 3DEC vs RS2
- 3DEC vs GEOVIA GEMS
- 3DEC vs Wenco
- 3DEC vs Snowden Supervisor
- 3DEC vs Vulcan Geological Modelling
- 3DEC vs Seequent Central
- 3DEC vs GeoStudio
- 3DEC vs Whittle
- 3DEC vs IronCAD
- 3DEC vs Creo
- 3DEC vs BricsCAD
- 3DEC vs MicroSurvey CAD
- 3DEC vs Bentley MicroStation
- 3DEC vs Rhino 3D
- 3DEC vs Carlson Software
- 3DEC vs Alibre Design
- 3DEC vs SolveSpace
- 3DEC vs Zoo
- 3DEC vs Altium 365
- 3DEC vs PrusaSlicer
- 3DEC vs Houdini
- 3DEC vs ZBrush
- 3DEC vs ANSYS Fluent
- 3DEC vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- 3DEC vs Corona Renderer
- Tinkercad vs Deswik Suite
- Tinkercad vs Leapfrog Geo
- Tinkercad vs Caterpillar MineStar
- Tinkercad vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- Tinkercad vs OptiMine
- Tinkercad vs Maptek I-Site
- Tinkercad vs Leica Geosystems Mining
- Tinkercad vs PLAXIS
- Tinkercad vs RS2
- Tinkercad vs GEOVIA GEMS
- Tinkercad vs Wenco
- Tinkercad vs Snowden Supervisor
- Tinkercad vs Vulcan Geological Modelling
- Tinkercad vs Seequent Central
- Tinkercad vs GeoStudio
- Tinkercad vs Whittle
- Tinkercad vs IronCAD
- Tinkercad vs Creo
- Tinkercad vs BricsCAD
- Tinkercad vs MicroSurvey CAD
- Tinkercad vs Bentley MicroStation
- Tinkercad vs Rhino 3D
- Tinkercad vs Carlson Software
- Tinkercad vs Alibre Design
- Tinkercad vs SolveSpace
- Tinkercad vs Zoo
- Tinkercad vs Altium 365
- Tinkercad vs PrusaSlicer
- Tinkercad vs Houdini
- Tinkercad vs ZBrush
- Tinkercad vs ANSYS Fluent
- Tinkercad vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- Tinkercad vs Corona Renderer
