Game Development · head to head
Armory3D vs Houdini

Armory3D
Game Development
Open-source 3D game engine integrated with Blender
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Armory3D compiled binaries are sold to fund the project while the source code itself is free to build from scratch; Houdini houdini Indie at $299 per year requires annual gross revenue under $100K USD
- They diverge on capability: Armory3D covers Blender integration, Houdini covers Procedural modeling.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Armory3D and Houdini actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Armory3D
- Blender integration
- 3D graphics rendering
- Physics engine (Bullet)
- Audio system
- Haxe scripting
- Particle effects
- Skeletal animation
- Material system
Only in Houdini
- Procedural modeling
- VFX
- Simulations
- Particle systems
- Pyro FX
- Ocean tools
- Rigging
- Rendering
Both cover
- Windows support
- Linux support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Armory3D
- 3D game developmentnot Houdini
- Blender-based gamesnot Houdini
- Web gamesnot Houdini
Houdini
- Procedural 3D modelling and environment generationnot Armory3D
- Visual effects simulation for pyro, fluids, cloth and rigid bodiesnot Armory3D
- Building reusable procedural assets for a studio pipelinenot Armory3D
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Armory3D
- Compiled binaries are sold to fund the project while the source code itself is free to build from scratch
Houdini
- Houdini Indie at $299 per year requires annual gross revenue under $100K USD
- Houdini Indie cannot be used in the same pipeline as commercial versions of Houdini
- Houdini Indie and Apprentice save to their own .hipnc file format, which commercial Houdini pipelines do not share
- The free Apprentice edition is non commercial, caps render resolution at 1920x1080 and watermarks output images
- Houdini Indie ships with only 2 render tokens
- Full DOP level simulation node access requires Houdini FX at $4,495 per workstation; Core at $1,995 exposes only SOP level pre built simulation assets
- Extra render tokens cost $195
Pricing, plan by plan
Armory3D
Free- FreeFree
- Full engine
- Blender integration
- 3D graphics
Houdini
Free- ApprenticeFree
- Learning version
- Non-commercial
- Indie$269/month
- Revenue limit $100K
- Core$1995/month
- Full commercial
- FX$4495/month
- Full + simulations
Which should you pick?
Choose Armory3D if
- You need blender integration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Macos, Linux, Html5, Android.
- You also want 3d graphics rendering.
Choose Houdini if
- You need procedural modeling.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
- You also want vfx.
Questions people ask
- Is Armory3D or Houdini better?
- Neither clearly leads. Armory3D starts at Free and Houdini at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Armory3D or Houdini?
- Armory3D starts at Free and Houdini at Free.
- Does Armory3D or Houdini run on more platforms?
- Armory3D runs on Windows, Macos, Linux, Html5, Android. Houdini runs on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
- Can I use Armory3D for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Armory3D best used for?
- Armory3D is most often used for 3d game development, blender-based games, web games. Of those, 3d game development and blender-based games are not what Houdini is typically brought in for.
- What can Armory3D do that Houdini cannot?
- Armory3D covers Blender integration, 3D graphics rendering, Physics engine (Bullet), Audio system. Houdini covers Procedural modeling, VFX, Simulations, Particle systems. Both handle Windows support, Linux support.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Armory3D vs DragonBones
- Armory3D vs Unity
- Armory3D vs Aseprite
- Armory3D vs Godot Engine
- Armory3D vs Cascadeur
- Armory3D vs Construct 3
- Armory3D vs GameMaker Studio 2
- Armory3D vs Mixamo
- Armory3D vs Pico-8
- Armory3D vs Substance 3D Painter
- Armory3D vs Adventure Game Studio
- Armory3D vs AppGameKit
- Armory3D vs Bevy
- Armory3D vs Buildbox
- Armory3D vs Clickteam Fusion
- Armory3D vs Cocos2d-x
- Armory3D vs CryEngine
- Armory3D vs Defold
- Armory3D vs Enscape
- Armory3D vs V-Ray
- Armory3D vs FreeCAD
- Armory3D vs KeyShot
- Armory3D vs Lumion
- Armory3D vs Arnold
- Armory3D vs Inventor
- Armory3D vs Mudbox
- Armory3D vs Corona Renderer
- Armory3D vs D5 Render
- Armory3D vs Twinmotion
- Armory3D vs LightWave 3D
- Armory3D vs OpenSCAD
- Armory3D vs PrusaSlicer
- Armory3D vs Siemens NX
- Armory3D vs ZBrush
- Armory3D vs 3D-Coat
- Armory3D vs Alibre Design
- Houdini vs DragonBones
- Houdini vs Unity
- Houdini vs Aseprite
- Houdini vs Godot Engine
- Houdini vs Cascadeur
- Houdini vs Construct 3
- Houdini vs GameMaker Studio 2
- Houdini vs Mixamo
- Houdini vs Pico-8
- Houdini vs Substance 3D Painter
- Houdini vs Adventure Game Studio
- Houdini vs AppGameKit
- Houdini vs Bevy
- Houdini vs Buildbox
- Houdini vs Clickteam Fusion
- Houdini vs Cocos2d-x
- Houdini vs CryEngine
- Houdini vs Defold
- Houdini vs Enscape
- Houdini vs V-Ray
- Houdini vs FreeCAD
- Houdini vs KeyShot
- Houdini vs Lumion
- Houdini vs Arnold
- Houdini vs Inventor
- Houdini vs Mudbox
- Houdini vs Corona Renderer
- Houdini vs D5 Render
- Houdini vs Twinmotion
- Houdini vs LightWave 3D
- Houdini vs OpenSCAD
- Houdini vs PrusaSlicer
- Houdini vs Siemens NX
- Houdini vs ZBrush
- Houdini vs 3D-Coat
- Houdini vs Alibre Design

