Softwr

APIs · head to head

10x Banking vs Aiia

10x Banking logo

10x Banking

APIs

Cloud-native core banking platform built for large incumbent bank migrations

From
On request
Rated
-
Aiia logo

Aiia

APIs

Open banking and open finance API platform, now operating as Mastercard Open Banking

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: 10x Banking engagements are multi-year core replacement programmes with costs dominated by migration and integration, so the licence is a minority of what you actually spend.; Aiia it is now part of Mastercard rather than an independent company, so a business specifically wanting to avoid card network dependency in its banking infrastructure no longer gets that separation by choosing Aiia.
  • They diverge on capability: 10x Banking covers SuperCore ledger, Aiia covers Bank account data access.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which 10x Banking and Aiia actually diverge.

Attributes where 10x Banking and Aiia differ
Attribute10x BankingAiia
PlatformsWeb, REST API, LinuxWeb, API

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in 10x Banking

  • SuperCore ledger
  • Product configuration
  • Event streaming
  • Migration tooling
  • Payments orchestration
  • Cloud deployment

Only in Aiia

  • Bank account data access
  • Payment initiation
  • Mastercard Open Finance integration
  • Modern authentication support
  • Multi-country coverage
  • Developer documentation and sandbox

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

10x Banking

  • A tier-one bank replacing a mainframe core over several years while keeping it running in parallelnot Aiia
  • A bank launching a separate digital brand on a modern core before migrating the main booknot Aiia
  • An institution whose regulator demands real-time transaction data its legacy core cannot producenot Aiia
  • A bank whose product launch cycle is limited by core release schedules rather than by demandnot Aiia

Aiia

  • A lending or credit product needing affordability checks via European bank account datanot 10x Banking
  • A personal finance or accounting product needing transaction history across Nordic and European banksnot 10x Banking
  • A payments product wanting account-to-account payment initiation under open banking regulationnot 10x Banking
  • A business wanting the stability and continued investment of Mastercard ownership behind its banking connectivity providernot 10x Banking

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

10x Banking

  • Engagements are multi-year core replacement programmes with costs dominated by migration and integration, so the licence is a minority of what you actually spend.
  • The customer list is small and concentrated in large institutions, which makes reference checking and benchmarking difficult before committing.
  • It is a smaller vendor than Temenos or Finastra carrying a systemically important workload, and bank procurement teams treat that concentration as a genuine risk.
  • Product configuration replaces code but shifts complexity into configuration governance, which banks must staff and control just as carefully as software releases.
  • Value only appears after migration, so a programme cancelled or paused mid-transition leaves the bank running two cores and paying for both.

Aiia

  • It is now part of Mastercard rather than an independent company, so a business specifically wanting to avoid card network dependency in its banking infrastructure no longer gets that separation by choosing Aiia.
  • Pricing is not published and requires engaging Mastercard's open finance sales process, which can be a heavier sales motion than dealing with a smaller independent open banking provider.
  • Its strongest bank coverage remains concentrated in the Nordics and Northern Europe, so companies needing dense coverage in Southern or Eastern Europe should verify current bank connectivity before committing.
  • Brand confusion is real: developer documentation, login portals and older case studies still reference "Aiia" while newer Mastercard material refers to "Mastercard Open Banking," and a company researching either name in isolation may miss half the relevant material.
  • As with any open banking platform, reliability still depends on the consistency of the underlying banks' own APIs, which is a systemic industry issue rather than something Aiia specifically controls.

Pricing, plan by plan

10x Banking

On request
  • SuperCore$undefined/year
    • Multi-year enterprise licence, quoted
    • Scaling by accounts, transaction volume and product lines
    • Substantial implementation and migration programme costs

Aiia

On request
  • Aiia Enterprise (Mastercard Open Banking)$undefined/year
    • Pricing not published, quote via Mastercard Open Finance sales

Which should you pick?

Choose 10x Banking if

  • You need supercore ledger.
  • You work on Web, REST API, Linux.
  • You also want product configuration.

Choose Aiia if

  • You need bank account data access.
  • You work on Web, API.
  • You also want payment initiation.

Questions people ask

Is 10x Banking or Aiia better?
Neither clearly leads. 10x Banking starts at On request and Aiia at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, 10x Banking or Aiia?
10x Banking starts at On request and Aiia at On request.
Does 10x Banking or Aiia run on more platforms?
10x Banking runs on Web, REST API, Linux. Aiia runs on Web, API.
What is 10x Banking best used for?
10x Banking is most often used for a tier-one bank replacing a mainframe core over several years while keeping it running in parallel, a bank launching a separate digital brand on a modern core before migrating the main book, an institution whose regulator demands real-time transaction data its legacy core cannot produce, a bank whose product launch cycle is limited by core release schedules rather than by demand. Of those, a tier-one bank replacing a mainframe core over several years while keeping it running in parallel and a bank launching a separate digital brand on a modern core before migrating the main book are not what Aiia is typically brought in for.
What can 10x Banking do that Aiia cannot?
10x Banking covers SuperCore ledger, Product configuration, Event streaming, Migration tooling. Aiia covers Bank account data access, Payment initiation, Mastercard Open Finance integration, Modern authentication support.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

10x Banking: Who is 10x Banking for?

Large incumbent banks running core replacement, not challengers or fintechs looking for a quick launch.

Aiia: Is Aiia still an independent company?

No, it was acquired by Mastercard in 2021 and now operates as part of Mastercard Open Finance Solutions, referenced as Aiia Enterprise.

10x Banking: How long does implementation take?

Years rather than months. Migration design and coexistence with the legacy core dominate the timeline.

Aiia: Does the Aiia brand still exist?

Yes, in developer documentation and login portals, but the company behind it is Mastercard.

10x Banking: Is pricing published?

No. It is a quoted multi-year enterprise licence scaled by accounts, transaction volume and product lines.

Aiia: Which banks does it cover?

Around 3,000 European banks, with strongest coverage in the Nordics and Northern Europe.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads