
YCharts
Investment research and client proposal platform for financial advisers
Category
Investment analytics software gives asset managers, wealth managers, banks and research teams the market data, indexes, risk models, fund data and ESG research they use to build portfolios and make investment decisions. The category runs from professional terminals and data platforms used across trading floors, through fund and private markets research databases, to portfolio risk systems and ESG ratings providers. Most products here are licensed per seat or per data set and priced on quotation.
Every listing shows its published starting price on the same footing, so a shortlist does not take ten tabs.
Advertise: Feature your product in Investment Analytics, from $49 a month. See placements
Counted from the published pricing of the 13 listings on this page. A tool counts as free only where it publishes a $0 plan, an open-source licence or a starting price of zero.
Only Koyfin publishes a paid entry price here, at $39.
Entry price is not the ceiling. The dearest published tier anywhere in this category is Koyfin's at $299 a month, 7.7× the highest entry price on the page. Read the top of each ladder as well as the bottom, because that is where you land after two years of growth.
2 of 13 publish a $0 plan, and 1 of those charge nothing at all.
9 of 13 keep at least one tier unpriced and sold by quote, which in practice means the number you end up paying at the top end is not on this page or on theirs.
The billing model each of the 13 investment analytics listings publishes, counted. Two tools at the same headline price are not the same purchase if one of them charges per seat.
Separately, 9 of 13 publish at least one tier with no price attached. Those are sold by quote, so the top of the ladder is negotiable, and unknowable, until you talk to sales.
The subject tags that recur across these 13 listings, with the number of tools carrying each. A category label is a filing decision; this is the closer read of what is actually filed under it.
Carried by a single tool: Ai Research Assistant, Company Screening, Data Feeds, Excel Add In, Fund Research, Investment Management, Portfolio Management, risk management. If one of those is the reason you are here, the category page is the wrong lens, go straight to that product.
Four things the numbers above should change about your shortlist.
2 of 13 investment analytics tools here publish a $0 plan, which is enough to run a real trial without a purchase order. A free tier is worth more than a free trial when you are evaluating: a trial expires on the vendor's schedule, a free plan expires when you outgrow it. The thing to check before you commit is which of the capabilities below sit above the free line, starting with priced by quotation, the single most frequently named capability in this category's published tiers.
$39 to $39 is a $0 spread on entry price alone, and a spread that wide is never about polish, it is about who the vendor built for. Tools at the bottom of this ladder are priced for one person or a small team; tools near $39 are priced for a department with a procurement process. Decide which of those you are before you compare capability, or you will shortlist four tools that were never competing for the same buyer.
4 of 13 tools here publish three or more tiers, and the median vendor in this category ships 2 of them. The advertised price is the first rung, and the things teams tend to need, priced by quotation, are named in higher plans far more often than in entry ones. Price your shortlist at the tier that contains what you need, not at the tier on the pricing page's left edge.
This category splits across 2 billing models: quote on 12 listings, freemium on 1, and nothing else. A per-user price and a flat subscription at the same headline figure are not the same purchase, the first one grows with headcount and the second does not. Multiply by your real team size before you compare two numbers side by side.
Every pairing below is a full comparison: the same checklist applied to both, so a gap in one is a gap in the other.
Answered from the listings on this page, and nowhere else.
Keep this
The shortlist for “Investment Analytics”, plus a note if any of their prices change.
Adjacent in the same taxonomy, not a ranking.