Browser Extensions · head to head
Tampermonkey vs Pocket
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Tampermonkey only source code up to version 2.9 is GPLv3; all newer versions are distributed under a proprietary license despite the extension itself being free to use; Pocket no note-taking feature despite competitor Instapaper offering this
- They diverge on capability: Tampermonkey covers Userscript management, Pocket covers Save for later.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Tampermonkey and Pocket actually diverge.
| Attribute | Tampermonkey | |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, Android | Web, iOS, Android, Chrome, Firefox, Safari |
| Founded | 2010 | 2007 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Unknown), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Browser Extensions).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Tampermonkey
- Userscript management
- Script editor
- Auto-update
- Cloud sync
Only in Pocket
- Save for later
- Offline reading
- Clean reading view
- Tagging
Both cover
- Chrome support
- Firefox support
- Edge support
- Safari support
- Opera support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Tampermonkey
- Auto-run custom JavaScript to add features to specific websitesnot Pocket
- Block ads, remove clutter, or reformat page layout via community/personal userscriptsnot Pocket
- Run scripts sourced from Greasy Fork or similar userscript repositoriesnot Pocket
- Automate repetitive web tasks such as form-filling or redirect skipping via installed scriptsnot Pocket
No use cases recorded yet. See the Pocket review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Tampermonkey
- Only source code up to version 2.9 is GPLv3; all newer versions are distributed under a proprietary license despite the extension itself being free to use
- Under Manifest V3, GM_webRequest is not (yet) supported
- Under Manifest V3, GM_xmlhttpRequest fires only one progress event instead of streaming progress, requiring a responseType: 'stream' workaround
- Since v5.3.2, Chrome/Edge (MV3) requires the user to manually enable Developer Mode, or from Chrome 138+ a per-extension 'Allow User Scripts' toggle, before any userscript will run
- No note-taking feature despite competitor Instapaper offering this
- Full-text search of saved articles limited to premium tier ($4.99/month)
- Highlights feature was unreliable and often failed to work properly with large libraries
- Images, particularly infographics and data-heavy charts, frequently failed to display properly in the reading view
- Limited sharing capabilities with non-Pocket users
Pricing, plan by plan
Tampermonkey
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Tampermonkey review.
- Premium$4.99/month
- Permanent library backup
- Full-text search
- AI-suggested tags
- Premium Annual$45/year
- Permanent library backup
- Full-text search
- AI-suggested tags
Which should you pick?
Choose Tampermonkey if
- You need userscript management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, Android.
- You also want script editor.
Choose Pocket if
- You need save for later.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Chrome, Firefox, Safari.
- You also want offline reading.
Questions people ask
- Is Tampermonkey or Pocket better?
- Neither clearly leads. Tampermonkey starts at Free and Pocket at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Tampermonkey or Pocket?
- Tampermonkey starts at Free and Pocket at Free.
- Does Tampermonkey or Pocket run on more platforms?
- Tampermonkey runs on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, Android. Pocket runs on Web, iOS, Android, Chrome, Firefox, Safari.
- Can I use Tampermonkey for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Tampermonkey best used for?
- Tampermonkey is most often used for auto-run custom javascript to add features to specific websites, block ads, remove clutter, or reformat page layout via community/personal userscripts, run scripts sourced from greasy fork or similar userscript repositories, automate repetitive web tasks such as form-filling or redirect skipping via installed scripts. Of those, auto-run custom javascript to add features to specific websites and block ads, remove clutter, or reformat page layout via community/personal userscripts are not what Pocket is typically brought in for.
- What can Tampermonkey do that Pocket cannot?
- Tampermonkey covers Userscript management, Script editor, Auto-update, Cloud sync. Pocket covers Save for later, Offline reading, Clean reading view, Tagging. Both handle Chrome support, Firefox support, Edge support, Safari support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Pocket: Does Pocket work offline?
Yes. Pocket syncs articles to your device for offline reading access on phones, tablets, and computers.
SourcePocket: Is Pocket free to use?
Pocket was free with unlimited article saves, offline reading, and basic tagging. Premium was $4.99/month or $45/year, adding features like permanent library backup, full-text search, and AI-suggested tags.
SourcePocket: How do I export my saved articles?
Users could export data via CSV file by visiting getpocket.com/export before the October 8, 2025 deadline. The export includes links and metadata but not full article text or offline cached content.
SourcePocket: Can I take notes while reading articles in Pocket?
Pocket did not have a native note-taking feature. Premium subscribers could highlight and annotate articles, but text notes were not supported, unlike competitor Instapaper.
SourcePocket: Does Pocket sync across my devices?
Yes. Saved articles, tags, and reading progress synced automatically across iOS, Android, Web, and browser extensions.
SourcePocket: What happened to Pocket?
Mozilla shut down Pocket on July 8, 2025, as part of a strategic shift to focus resources on Firefox. Users could export data until October 8, 2025, after which all saved data was permanently deleted.
SourceRelated pages
More on Tampermonkey
Other head to heads
- Tampermonkey vs Dark Reader
- Tampermonkey vs Raindrop.io
- Tampermonkey vs Privacy Badger
- Tampermonkey vs AdBlock Plus
- Tampermonkey vs Evernote Web Clipper
- Tampermonkey vs Instapaper
- Tampermonkey vs Awesome Screenshot
- Tampermonkey vs BuiltWith
- Tampermonkey vs Capital One Shopping
- Tampermonkey vs Ghostery
- Tampermonkey vs Honey
- Tampermonkey vs LanguageTool
- Tampermonkey vs Mercury Reader
- Tampermonkey vs ProWritingAid
- Tampermonkey vs Rakuten
- Tampermonkey vs SimilarWeb
- Tampermonkey vs uBlock Origin
- Tampermonkey vs Hemingway Editor
- Pocket vs Dark Reader
- Pocket vs Raindrop.io
- Pocket vs Privacy Badger
- Pocket vs AdBlock Plus
- Pocket vs Evernote Web Clipper
- Pocket vs Instapaper
- Pocket vs Awesome Screenshot
- Pocket vs BuiltWith
- Pocket vs Capital One Shopping
- Pocket vs Ghostery
- Pocket vs Honey
- Pocket vs LanguageTool
- Pocket vs Mercury Reader
- Pocket vs ProWritingAid
- Pocket vs Rakuten
- Pocket vs SimilarWeb
- Pocket vs uBlock Origin
- Pocket vs Hemingway Editor


