Software · head to head
Lattice vs TeamViewer

Lattice
Software
People management platform for growing companies
- From
- $11/month
- Rated
- -

TeamViewer
Software
Remote access and support software from Germany, used for connecting to computers anywhere
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Lattice a $4,000 minimum annual agreement applies, so the per seat prices only describe the cost above that floor; TeamViewer pricing page gates all figures behind plan selection with no listed price for its Teams and Tensor Enterprise tiers, which are described as a fully customized license requiring sales contact
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Lattice and TeamViewer actually diverge.
| Attribute | Lattice | TeamViewer |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $11/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Ios, Android, Api | Web |
| Founded | 2015 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Lattice
- Performance reviews
- OKRs & goal tracking
- Employee engagement surveys
- 1-on-1 meetings
- Continuous feedback
- Compensation management
- Career development
- People analytics
Only in TeamViewer
Nothing recorded that Lattice does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Lattice
- Running performance reviews, goals and engagement surveysnot TeamViewer
- Managing compensation cycles and career development frameworksnot TeamViewer
TeamViewer
No use cases recorded yet. See the TeamViewer review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Lattice
- A $4,000 minimum annual agreement applies, so the per seat prices only describe the cost above that floor
- Billing is annual only
- The platform is sold as three separate base products at $10, $8 and $4 per seat per month, so a full deployment stacks rather than being one price
- Compensation and Grow are further add ons at $6 and $4 per seat per month on top
TeamViewer
- Pricing page gates all figures behind plan selection with no listed price for its Teams and Tensor Enterprise tiers, which are described as a fully customized license requiring sales contact
- Add-on modules (Asset Management, Endpoint Protection, Device Monitoring, Assist AR Lite, Mobile Device Management) are sold separately from the core license, only offered with a 30-day free trial before charges apply
Pricing, plan by plan
Lattice
$11/month- Performance Management$11/month
- Performance reviews
- Goals & OKRs
- 1-on-1s
- Performance + Engagement$15/month
- Everything in Performance
- Engagement surveys
- Pulse surveys
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- All features
- Advanced analytics
- Custom integrations
TeamViewer
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the TeamViewer review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Lattice if
- You need performance reviews.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- You also want okrs & goal tracking.
Choose TeamViewer if
Nothing in the data separates TeamViewer from Lattice on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is Lattice or TeamViewer better?
- Neither clearly leads. Lattice starts at $11/month and TeamViewer at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Lattice or TeamViewer?
- Lattice starts at $11/month and TeamViewer at On request.
- Does Lattice or TeamViewer run on more platforms?
- Lattice runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. TeamViewer runs on Web.
- What is Lattice best used for?
- Lattice is most often used for running performance reviews, goals and engagement surveys, managing compensation cycles and career development frameworks. Of those, running performance reviews, goals and engagement surveys and managing compensation cycles and career development frameworks are not what TeamViewer is typically brought in for.
- What can Lattice do that TeamViewer cannot?
- Lattice covers Performance reviews, OKRs & goal tracking, Employee engagement surveys, 1-on-1 meetings.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Lattice vs BambooHR
- Lattice vs Workday
- Lattice vs Culture Amp
- Lattice vs Freshteam
- Lattice vs TINYpulse
- Lattice vs Zoho People
- Lattice vs 15Five
- Lattice vs Bonusly
- Lattice vs CharlieHR
- Lattice vs Kudos
- Lattice vs Personio
- Lattice vs Achievers
- Lattice vs Breathe HR
- Lattice vs Darwinbox
- Lattice vs Employment Hero
- Lattice vs greytHR
- Lattice vs HiBob
- Lattice vs Homebase
- Lattice vs Zoom
- Lattice vs Microsoft Teams
- Lattice vs Loom
- Lattice vs RingCentral Video
- Lattice vs Slack
- Lattice vs Telegram
- Lattice vs Webex by Cisco
- Lattice vs Chanty
- Lattice vs Chatwork
- Lattice vs Flock
- Lattice vs Google Chat
- Lattice vs Grasshopper
- Lattice vs Lark
- Lattice vs Mattermost
- Lattice vs Quo
- Lattice vs Rocket.Chat
- Lattice vs Signal
- Lattice vs Textline
- TeamViewer vs BambooHR
- TeamViewer vs Workday
- TeamViewer vs Culture Amp
- TeamViewer vs Freshteam
- TeamViewer vs TINYpulse
- TeamViewer vs Zoho People
- TeamViewer vs 15Five
- TeamViewer vs Bonusly
- TeamViewer vs CharlieHR
- TeamViewer vs Kudos
- TeamViewer vs Personio
- TeamViewer vs Achievers
- TeamViewer vs Breathe HR
- TeamViewer vs Darwinbox
- TeamViewer vs Employment Hero
- TeamViewer vs greytHR
- TeamViewer vs HiBob
- TeamViewer vs Homebase
- TeamViewer vs Zoom
- TeamViewer vs Microsoft Teams
- TeamViewer vs Loom
- TeamViewer vs RingCentral Video
- TeamViewer vs Slack
- TeamViewer vs Telegram
- TeamViewer vs Webex by Cisco
- TeamViewer vs Chanty
- TeamViewer vs Chatwork
- TeamViewer vs Flock
- TeamViewer vs Google Chat
- TeamViewer vs Grasshopper
- TeamViewer vs Lark
- TeamViewer vs Mattermost
- TeamViewer vs Quo
- TeamViewer vs Rocket.Chat
- TeamViewer vs Signal
- TeamViewer vs Textline
