Cloud & Infrastructure · head to head
Linode vs Sync.com

Linode
Cloud & Infrastructure
Affordable cloud hosting and infrastructure
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Sync.com
File Storage & Backup
Cloud storage, backup and sharing with end-to-end encryption
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Linode has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Linode linode.com/pricing returns a 301 redirect to akamai.com/cloud/pricing; the service is now sold as Akamai Cloud; Sync.com all Teams plans require a minimum of 3 users
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Linode and Sync.com actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Linode
- Compute instances
- Object storage
- Block storage
- Kubernetes
- Managed database
- Load balancers
- Firewalls
- Private networks
Only in Sync.com
Nothing recorded that Linode does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Linode
- Running Linux virtual machines on hourly billed shared or dedicated CPU plansnot Sync.com
- Managed Kubernetes, block storage and object storage on a single cloud accountnot Sync.com
- Hosting workloads in a specific one of the listed global regionsnot Sync.com
Sync.com
No use cases recorded yet. See the Sync.com review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Linode
- linode.com/pricing returns a 301 redirect to akamai.com/cloud/pricing; the service is now sold as Akamai Cloud
- Charges accrue for any service on the account even when it is powered off, because RAM and network capacity stay reserved; only deleting the service stops billing
- Network transfer beyond the monthly allotment is billed from $0.005 per GB and the rate varies by region
- The Akamai Cloud pricing landing page shows no rates and directs visitors to regional pricing pages or sales
Sync.com
- All Teams plans require a minimum of 3 users
- The advertised low monthly rate (e.g. $4/month for Teams 1TB) is a promotional annual rate described as 50% off; the standard monthly price is $8/month without the promotion
- Enterprise pricing for 100+ users is custom and requires contacting a dedicated account manager
Pricing, plan by plan
Linode
Free- Nanode 1GB$5/month
- 1GB RAM
- 1 vCPU
- 25GB SSD
- Linode 4GB$20/month
- 4GB RAM
- 2 vCPU
- 80GB SSD
Sync.com
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Sync.com review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Linode if
- You need compute instances.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Cli.
- You also want object storage.
Choose Sync.com if
Nothing in the data separates Sync.com from Linode on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is Linode or Sync.com better?
- Neither clearly leads. Linode starts at Free and Sync.com at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Linode or Sync.com?
- Linode has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Linode and On request for Sync.com.
- Does Linode or Sync.com run on more platforms?
- Linode runs on Web, Api, Cli. Sync.com runs on Web.
- Can I use Linode for free?
- Yes. Linode has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sync.com starts at On request.
- What is Linode best used for?
- Linode is most often used for running linux virtual machines on hourly billed shared or dedicated cpu plans, managed kubernetes, block storage and object storage on a single cloud account, hosting workloads in a specific one of the listed global regions. Of those, running linux virtual machines on hourly billed shared or dedicated cpu plans and managed kubernetes, block storage and object storage on a single cloud account are not what Sync.com is typically brought in for.
- What can Linode do that Sync.com cannot?
- Linode covers Compute instances, Object storage, Block storage, Kubernetes.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Linode vs Grafana Cloud
- Linode vs Neon
- Linode vs DigitalOcean
- Linode vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Linode vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Linode vs Deno Deploy
- Linode vs Heroku
- Linode vs Hetzner Cloud
- Linode vs Packer
- Linode vs Pulumi
- Linode vs Render
- Linode vs Upstash
- Linode vs Vagrant
- Linode vs Vultr
- Linode vs Akamai
- Linode vs Alibaba Cloud
- Linode vs Chef
- Linode vs Contabo
- Linode vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Linode vs Carbonite
- Linode vs Backblaze
- Linode vs Barracuda Backup
- Linode vs Arq Backup
- Linode vs CrashPlan
- Linode vs Duplicati
- Linode vs Zerto
- Linode vs Box
- Linode vs IDrive
- Linode vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Linode vs Nextcloud
- Linode vs pCloud
- Linode vs Tresorit
- Linode vs TrueNAS
- Linode vs Veritas NetBackup
- Sync.com vs Grafana Cloud
- Sync.com vs Neon
- Sync.com vs DigitalOcean
- Sync.com vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Sync.com vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Sync.com vs Deno Deploy
- Sync.com vs Heroku
- Sync.com vs Hetzner Cloud
- Sync.com vs Packer
- Sync.com vs Pulumi
- Sync.com vs Render
- Sync.com vs Upstash
- Sync.com vs Vagrant
- Sync.com vs Vultr
- Sync.com vs Akamai
- Sync.com vs Alibaba Cloud
- Sync.com vs Chef
- Sync.com vs Contabo
- Sync.com vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- Sync.com vs Carbonite
- Sync.com vs Backblaze
- Sync.com vs Barracuda Backup
- Sync.com vs Arq Backup
- Sync.com vs CrashPlan
- Sync.com vs Duplicati
- Sync.com vs Zerto
- Sync.com vs Box
- Sync.com vs IDrive
- Sync.com vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Sync.com vs Nextcloud
- Sync.com vs pCloud
- Sync.com vs Tresorit
- Sync.com vs TrueNAS
- Sync.com vs Veritas NetBackup
