Software · head to head
Stainless vs Kong Gateway

Stainless
Software
Generates client SDKs, API docs, and MCP servers from an OpenAPI spec
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Kong Gateway
Software
Open-source and cloud API gateway for managing microservices traffic
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Stainless starter and Pro plan prices are not published and require contacting the company.; Kong Gateway the free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.
- They diverge on capability: Stainless covers SDK generation, Kong Gateway covers API request routing.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Stainless and Kong Gateway actually diverge.
| Attribute | Stainless | Kong Gateway |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | web, api | web, linux, api |
| Founded | Unknown | 2017 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Stainless
- SDK generation
- MCP server generation
- Docs site generation
- Webhooks and streaming support
- Automated unit tests
- Git integration
Only in Kong Gateway
- API request routing
- Plugin ecosystem
- Developer portals
- AI Gateway
- Analytics and observability
- SSO and audit logs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Stainless
- Generating typed SDKs for a public APInot Kong Gateway
- Producing an MCP server from an existing OpenAPI specnot Kong Gateway
- Building an API documentation site alongside client librariesnot Kong Gateway
- Giving open-source APIs a free SDK generation pathnot Kong Gateway
Kong Gateway
- Routing and securing traffic across microservicesnot Stainless
- Publishing internal or external developer portalsnot Stainless
- Managing rate limits and authentication at the API edgenot Stainless
- Gateway-level routing to multiple LLM providersnot Stainless
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Stainless
- Starter and Pro plan prices are not published and require contacting the company.
- The free plan caps APIs at 25 endpoints, which excludes larger production APIs.
- Overage charges apply per SDK/endpoint/month once limits are exceeded, which can make costs unpredictable at scale.
Kong Gateway
- The free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.
- Plus tier caps API requests at 1M/month before incurring per-million overage charges.
- Enterprise pricing is custom and not published, making budgeting harder without sales contact.
- Configuration and plugin management can require significant operational expertise to run at scale.
Pricing, plan by plan
Stainless
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 5 generators (SDKs, docs, or MCP servers)
- 5 seats
- APIs with 25 or fewer endpoints
- Starter$undefined/mo
- Unlimited generators
- Expanded seats
- Private SDKs of any size
- Pro$undefined/mo
- Custom enterprise features and pricing
- Enterprise$undefined/mo
- Dedicated support
- SOC 2 compliance reports
- Purchase order/invoicing with negotiable terms
Kong Gateway
Free- Free TrialFree
- 30-day enterprise functionality trial
- Unlimited gateways
- 30-day analytics retention
- Plus$undefined/month
- Up to 5 serverless, 2 hybrid, 2 dedicated cloud gateways
- 1M API requests/month included
- Up to 2 developer portals
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Unlimited hybrid and dedicated cloud gateways
- Unlimited developer portals
- SSO and audit logs
Which should you pick?
Choose Stainless if
- You need sdk generation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want mcp server generation.
Choose Kong Gateway if
- You need api request routing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, linux, api.
- You also want plugin ecosystem.
Questions people ask
- Is Stainless or Kong Gateway better?
- Neither clearly leads. Stainless starts at Free and Kong Gateway at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Stainless or Kong Gateway?
- Stainless starts at Free and Kong Gateway at Free.
- Does Stainless or Kong Gateway run on more platforms?
- Stainless runs on web, api. Kong Gateway runs on web, linux, api.
- Can I use Stainless for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Stainless best used for?
- Stainless is most often used for generating typed sdks for a public api, producing an mcp server from an existing openapi spec, building an api documentation site alongside client libraries, giving open-source apis a free sdk generation path. Of those, generating typed sdks for a public api and producing an mcp server from an existing openapi spec are not what Kong Gateway is typically brought in for.
- What can Stainless do that Kong Gateway cannot?
- Stainless covers SDK generation, MCP server generation, Docs site generation, Webhooks and streaming support. Kong Gateway covers API request routing, Plugin ecosystem, Developer portals, AI Gateway.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Stainless: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
Yes. The Free plan supports up to 5 generators, 5 seats, APIs with 25 or fewer endpoints, and 100 preview builds per month, with email support.
SourceKong Gateway: Is Kong Gateway free?
Kong's core gateway is open source and free to self-host. Kong Konnect, the managed cloud platform, offers a 30-day free trial before moving to paid Plus or custom Enterprise pricing.
SourceStainless: Who owns the generated SDK code?
The generated SDK code is owned by the customer and published by Stainless under the Apache 2.0 license.
SourceKong Gateway: How is usage metered on the Plus plan?
The Plus plan includes 1M API requests per month, with additional usage billed at $200 per extra 1 million requests up to a 10M/month cap, plus per-gateway and per-LLM-model charges.
SourceStainless: What happens if I exceed my plan's endpoint limit?
Customers exceeding their endpoint limits are billed per SDK, per endpoint, per month for the overage.
SourceKong Gateway: What support is included?
Plus includes email support with a 2-business-day SLA, while Enterprise adds dedicated success managers and professional services.
SourceRelated pages
More on Kong Gateway
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Stainless vs Appwrite
- Stainless vs Hasura
- Stainless vs PocketBase
- Stainless vs Sanity
- Stainless vs Apigee
- Stainless vs Ably
- Stainless vs Pusher
- Stainless vs PubNub
- Stainless vs Treblle
- Stainless vs Apollo GraphQL
- Stainless vs Bruno
- Stainless vs KeystoneJS
- Stainless vs Moesif
- Stainless vs Parse Server
- Stainless vs Stoplight
- Stainless vs Strapi
- Stainless vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Kong Gateway vs Appwrite
- Kong Gateway vs Hasura
- Kong Gateway vs PocketBase
- Kong Gateway vs Sanity
- Kong Gateway vs Apigee
- Kong Gateway vs Ably
- Kong Gateway vs Pusher
- Kong Gateway vs PubNub
- Kong Gateway vs Treblle
- Kong Gateway vs Apollo GraphQL
- Kong Gateway vs Bruno
- Kong Gateway vs KeystoneJS
- Kong Gateway vs Moesif
- Kong Gateway vs Parse Server
- Kong Gateway vs Stoplight
- Kong Gateway vs Strapi
- Kong Gateway vs Swagger/OpenAPI
