AR/VR & Metaverse · head to head
Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Pico-8
Microsoft HoloLens 2
AR/VR & Metaverse
Enterprise mixed reality for the modern workplace
- From
- $3500/one-time
- Rated
- -

Pico-8
Game Development
A fantasy console for making, sharing and playing tiny games
- From
- $14.99/one-time
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Microsoft HoloLens 2 narrow field of view of 52 degrees limits visibility of holograms and causes parts of 3D objects to disappear when viewing up close; Pico-8 extremely limited display resolution of 128x128 pixels with 16-colour palette
- They diverge on capability: Microsoft HoloLens 2 covers Spatial mapping, Pico-8 covers Pixel art editor.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Microsoft HoloLens 2 and Pico-8 actually diverge.
| Attribute | Microsoft HoloLens 2 | Pico-8 |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $3500/one-time | $14.99/one-time |
| Pricing model | Unknown | one-time |
| Platforms | Standalone AR Headset | Windows, macOS, Linux, Raspberry Pi |
| Category | AR/VR & Metaverse | Game Development |
| Founded | 2015 | 2005 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Microsoft HoloLens 2
- Spatial mapping
- Hand tracking
- Eye tracking
- Holographic display
- Azure
- Dynamics 365
- Microsoft Teams
- Mixed-reality support
Only in Pico-8
- Pixel art editor
- Music composer
- Lua scripting
- Built-in palette
- Sprite system
- Map editor
- Code editor
- Game cartridges
Both cover
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Microsoft HoloLens 2
- VR Gamingnot Pico-8
- AR Marketingnot Pico-8
- Virtual Trainingnot Pico-8
- 3D Visualizationnot Pico-8
- Immersive Experiencesnot Pico-8
Pico-8
- Retro-style indie game developmentnot Microsoft HoloLens 2
- Educational game programmingnot Microsoft HoloLens 2
- Game jam participationnot Microsoft HoloLens 2
- Pixel art game creation with strict creative constraintsnot Microsoft HoloLens 2
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Microsoft HoloLens 2
- Narrow field of view of 52 degrees limits visibility of holograms and causes parts of 3D objects to disappear when viewing up close
- Heavy weight makes extended wearing uncomfortable and impractical for sessions longer than a few hours
- Short battery life of 2.5 to 5.5 hours limits extended deployments without charging
- Display is sensitive to bright light and sunlight, with rainbow color artifacts and poor outdoor readability
- High price of $3,500 limits accessibility to enterprises with substantial budgets
Pico-8
- Extremely limited display resolution of 128x128 pixels with 16-colour palette
- Cart size capped at 32 kilobytes
- Only 256 sprites of 8x8 pixels available
- Map limited to 128x32 tiles
- Monophonic sound synthesis with 4-channel chip synthesis only
- Lua programming language exclusively; no other language support
Pricing, plan by plan
Microsoft HoloLens 2
$3500/one-timeNo published plan breakdown. See the Microsoft HoloLens 2 review.
Pico-8
$14.99/one-timeNo published plan breakdown. See the Pico-8 review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Microsoft HoloLens 2 if
- You need spatial mapping.
- You work on Standalone AR Headset.
- You also want hand tracking.
Choose Pico-8 if
- You need pixel art editor.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, Raspberry Pi.
- You also want music composer.
Questions people ask
- Is Microsoft HoloLens 2 or Pico-8 better?
- Neither clearly leads. Microsoft HoloLens 2 starts at $3500/one-time and Pico-8 at $14.99/one-time, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Microsoft HoloLens 2 or Pico-8?
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 starts at $3500/one-time and Pico-8 at $14.99/one-time.
- Does Microsoft HoloLens 2 or Pico-8 run on more platforms?
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 runs on Standalone AR Headset. Pico-8 runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, Raspberry Pi.
- What is Microsoft HoloLens 2 best used for?
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 is most often used for vr gaming, ar marketing, virtual training, 3d visualization. Of those, vr gaming and ar marketing are not what Pico-8 is typically brought in for.
- What can Microsoft HoloLens 2 do that Pico-8 cannot?
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 covers Spatial mapping, Hand tracking, Eye tracking, Holographic display. Pico-8 covers Pixel art editor, Music composer, Lua scripting, Built-in palette. Both handle Windows support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Microsoft HoloLens 2: How long is the battery life of HoloLens 2?
HoloLens 2 battery life is 2.5 to 5.5 hours of active use depending on workload intensity and brightness settings.
SourceMicrosoft HoloLens 2: What is the field of view for HoloLens 2?
HoloLens 2 has a 52-degree field of view (43 degrees horizontal and 29 degrees vertical), which is considered narrow and limits the visible hologram area when viewing objects up close.
SourceMicrosoft HoloLens 2: Can HoloLens 2 be worn over glasses?
Yes, HoloLens 2 can be worn directly over glasses with an ergonomic design that allows the visor to flip up, though comfort depends on the glasses' size and weight.
SourceMicrosoft HoloLens 2: What is the price of HoloLens 2?
The HoloLens 2 costs $3,500 USD with enterprise rental options at $125 per month and developer rental at $99 per month.
SourceRelated pages
More on Microsoft HoloLens 2
Other head to heads
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs ARCore
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs ARKit
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Meta Quest
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Apple Vision Pro
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Unity AR Foundation
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs HTC Vive
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs 8th Wall
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Lens Studio
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Vuforia
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs A-Frame
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Babylon.js
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Niantic Lightship
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs PlayStation VR2
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Spark AR Studio
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs TikTok Effect House
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Gravity Sketch
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Instagram AR Effects
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Magic Leap 2
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs DragonBones
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Unity
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Aseprite
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Godot Engine
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Cascadeur
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Construct 3
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs GameMaker Studio 2
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Mixamo
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Substance 3D Painter
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Adventure Game Studio
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs AppGameKit
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Armory3D
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Bevy
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Buildbox
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Clickteam Fusion
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Cocos2d-x
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs CryEngine
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs Defold
- Pico-8 vs ARCore
- Pico-8 vs ARKit
- Pico-8 vs Meta Quest
- Pico-8 vs Apple Vision Pro
- Pico-8 vs Unity AR Foundation
- Pico-8 vs HTC Vive
- Pico-8 vs 8th Wall
- Pico-8 vs Lens Studio
- Pico-8 vs Vuforia
- Pico-8 vs A-Frame
- Pico-8 vs Babylon.js
- Pico-8 vs Niantic Lightship
- Pico-8 vs PlayStation VR2
- Pico-8 vs Spark AR Studio
- Pico-8 vs TikTok Effect House
- Pico-8 vs Gravity Sketch
- Pico-8 vs Instagram AR Effects
- Pico-8 vs Magic Leap 2
- Pico-8 vs DragonBones
- Pico-8 vs Unity
- Pico-8 vs Aseprite
- Pico-8 vs Godot Engine
- Pico-8 vs Cascadeur
- Pico-8 vs Construct 3
- Pico-8 vs GameMaker Studio 2
- Pico-8 vs Mixamo
- Pico-8 vs Substance 3D Painter
- Pico-8 vs Adventure Game Studio
- Pico-8 vs AppGameKit
- Pico-8 vs Armory3D
- Pico-8 vs Bevy
- Pico-8 vs Buildbox
- Pico-8 vs Clickteam Fusion
- Pico-8 vs Cocos2d-x
- Pico-8 vs CryEngine
- Pico-8 vs Defold
