Softwr

AR/VR & Metaverse · head to head

A-Frame vs Microsoft HoloLens 2

A-Frame logo

A-Frame

AR/VR & Metaverse

Web framework for building VR experiences

From
Free
Rated
-
Microsoft HoloLens 2 logo

Microsoft HoloLens 2

AR/VR & Metaverse

Enterprise mixed reality for the modern workplace

From
$3500/one-time
Rated
-

The short version

  • Only A-Frame has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: A-Frame requires WebXR-capable browser; not supported on older browsers or devices without WebXR implementation; Microsoft HoloLens 2 narrow field of view of 52 degrees limits visibility of holograms and causes parts of 3D objects to disappear when viewing up close
  • They diverge on capability: A-Frame covers Declarative HTML, Microsoft HoloLens 2 covers Spatial mapping.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which A-Frame and Microsoft HoloLens 2 actually diverge.

Attributes where A-Frame and Microsoft HoloLens 2 differ
AttributeA-FrameMicrosoft HoloLens 2
Starting priceFree$3500/one-time
Pricing modelopen-sourceUnknown
Free tierYesNo
PlatformsWeb (via WebXR), VR headsets, AR-capable mobile devicesStandalone AR Headset

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (AR/VR & Metaverse), founded (2015).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in A-Frame

  • Declarative HTML
  • Entity-component system
  • WebXR support
  • Cross-platform
  • Three.js
  • AR.js
  • Physics engines
  • Networking

Only in Microsoft HoloLens 2

  • Spatial mapping
  • Hand tracking
  • Eye tracking
  • Holographic display
  • Azure
  • Dynamics 365
  • Microsoft Teams
  • Mixed-reality support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

A-Frame

  • Virtual reality web experiencesnot Microsoft HoloLens 2
  • Augmented reality applicationsnot Microsoft HoloLens 2
  • 3D web visualisationsnot Microsoft HoloLens 2
  • Interactive 3D content for web browsersnot Microsoft HoloLens 2

Microsoft HoloLens 2

  • VR Gamingnot A-Frame
  • AR Marketingnot A-Frame
  • Virtual Trainingnot A-Frame
  • 3D Visualizationnot A-Frame
  • Immersive Experiencesnot A-Frame

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

A-Frame

  • Requires WebXR-capable browser; not supported on older browsers or devices without WebXR implementation

Microsoft HoloLens 2

  • Narrow field of view of 52 degrees limits visibility of holograms and causes parts of 3D objects to disappear when viewing up close
  • Heavy weight makes extended wearing uncomfortable and impractical for sessions longer than a few hours
  • Short battery life of 2.5 to 5.5 hours limits extended deployments without charging
  • Display is sensitive to bright light and sunlight, with rainbow color artifacts and poor outdoor readability
  • High price of $3,500 limits accessibility to enterprises with substantial budgets

Pricing, plan by plan

A-Frame

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the A-Frame review.

Microsoft HoloLens 2

$3500/one-time

No published plan breakdown. See the Microsoft HoloLens 2 review.

Which should you pick?

Choose A-Frame if

  • You need declarative html.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web (via WebXR), VR headsets, AR-capable mobile devices.
  • You also want entity-component system.

Choose Microsoft HoloLens 2 if

  • You need spatial mapping.
  • You work on Standalone AR Headset.
  • You also want hand tracking.

Questions people ask

Is A-Frame or Microsoft HoloLens 2 better?
Neither clearly leads. A-Frame starts at Free and Microsoft HoloLens 2 at $3500/one-time, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, A-Frame or Microsoft HoloLens 2?
A-Frame has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for A-Frame and $3500/one-time for Microsoft HoloLens 2.
Does A-Frame or Microsoft HoloLens 2 run on more platforms?
A-Frame runs on Web (via WebXR), VR headsets, AR-capable mobile devices. Microsoft HoloLens 2 runs on Standalone AR Headset.
Can I use A-Frame for free?
Yes. A-Frame has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Microsoft HoloLens 2 starts at $3500/one-time.
What is A-Frame best used for?
A-Frame is most often used for virtual reality web experiences, augmented reality applications, 3d web visualisations, interactive 3d content for web browsers. Of those, virtual reality web experiences and augmented reality applications are not what Microsoft HoloLens 2 is typically brought in for.
What can A-Frame do that Microsoft HoloLens 2 cannot?
A-Frame covers Declarative HTML, Entity-component system, WebXR support, Cross-platform. Microsoft HoloLens 2 covers Spatial mapping, Hand tracking, Eye tracking, Holographic display.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Microsoft HoloLens 2: How long is the battery life of HoloLens 2?

HoloLens 2 battery life is 2.5 to 5.5 hours of active use depending on workload intensity and brightness settings.

Source
Microsoft HoloLens 2: What is the field of view for HoloLens 2?

HoloLens 2 has a 52-degree field of view (43 degrees horizontal and 29 degrees vertical), which is considered narrow and limits the visible hologram area when viewing objects up close.

Source
Microsoft HoloLens 2: Can HoloLens 2 be worn over glasses?

Yes, HoloLens 2 can be worn directly over glasses with an ergonomic design that allows the visor to flip up, though comfort depends on the glasses' size and weight.

Source
Microsoft HoloLens 2: What is the price of HoloLens 2?

The HoloLens 2 costs $3,500 USD with enterprise rental options at $125 per month and developer rental at $99 per month.

Source

Related pages

Other head to heads